Compare StocksCRM vs ROK

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CRM is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. ROK is overvalued at $480, with an intrinsic value of $221 and a margin of safety of -117%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02
VS
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
$480.08

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
ROK
  • Rockwell Automation, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 25.8% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
ROK
  • FCF yield of 2.5% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 49.7x is 40% above the historical average of 35.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 2.09 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
ROK
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$1.36B
N/A
FCF Yield
2.54%
21.32
Trailing P/E
49.75
11.86
Forward P/E
32.82
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
18.89%
16.91%
ROE
27.18%
77.64%
Gross Margin
48.92%
0.76
PEG Ratio
2.09
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
1.02
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.84
0.96%
Dividend Yield
1.15%
CRM: 6Ties: 1ROK: 4
CRMROK

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

ROK

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
ROK
$9.35
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.50B
Δ Market Cap
+$14.07B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
ROK
117.0% Overvalued
Price is 117.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $480.08
Fair Value: $221.26
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

ROK

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $480?

+21.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.8%

The market implies +21.9% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
ROK
69/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
ROK
-2.67
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
ROK
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 91.2%Retail & Other 8.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,991
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
ROK
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
ROK
5
Sells (3M)
49
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $37.81M
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$127,359
@ $453.23 · 2026-07-16
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$173,612
@ $460.51 · 2026-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$99,482
@ $456.34 · 2026-06-02
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$449,025
@ $426.02 · 2026-05-20
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$1.82M
@ $451.97 · 2026-05-07
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$246,252
@ $447.73 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$269,748
@ $449.58 · 2026-05-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$1.13M
@ $446.43 · 2026-05-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$480,000
@ $400.00 · 2026-04-13
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$78,209
@ $394.99 · 2026-04-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$484,375
@ $387.50 · 2026-04-08
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$107,341
@ $359.00 · 2026-04-02
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$3.56M
@ $398.92 · 2026-03-02
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$5.93M
@ $410.01 · 2026-02-26
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$7.04M
@ $404.61 · 2026-02-25
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$485,050
@ $404.21 · 2026-02-25
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$515,628
@ $405.69 · 2026-02-25
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$4.89M
@ $404.27 · 2026-02-25
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$812,599
@ $409.37 · 2026-02-25
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$77,548
@ $380.14 · 2026-02-17
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$313,600
@ $392.00 · 2026-01-02
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$664,640
@ $401.84 · 2025-12-10
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,792
@ $401.38 · 2025-12-10
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$828,475
@ $402.37 · 2025-12-10
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$388,205
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$184,676
@ $401.47 · 2025-12-10
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$823,435
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$116,500
@ $401.72 · 2025-12-10
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$438,542
@ $401.60 · 2025-12-10
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$550,861
@ $401.80 · 2025-12-10
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$114,934
@ $401.87 · 2025-12-10
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$46,999
@ $401.70 · 2025-12-10
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$113,607
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$118,860
@ $402.92 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$1.42M
@ $403.04 · 2025-12-05
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$56,004
@ $402.91 · 2025-12-05
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$74,127
@ $402.86 · 2025-12-05
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$149,476
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$27,396
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$51,981
@ $402.95 · 2025-12-05
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$149,486
@ $402.93 · 2025-12-05
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$24,173
@ $402.88 · 2025-12-05
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$12,087
@ $402.90 · 2025-12-05
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$300,030
@ $365.00 · 2025-10-29
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$87,500
@ $350.00 · 2025-09-11
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$35,552
@ $345.17 · 2025-09-08
PERDUCAT CYRIL
Chief Technology Officer
$499,500
@ $348.08 · 2025-08-29
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$127,181
@ $348.44 · 2025-08-29
KEANE JAMES P
Director
$1.07M
@ $356.06 · 2025-08-26
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$830,730
@ $350.67 · 2025-07-17
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$171,134
@ $325.35 · 2025-06-11
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$94,310
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$81,583
@ $326.33 · 2025-06-09
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$161,197
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$96,913
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$118,454
@ $326.32 · 2025-06-09
NARDECCHIA CHRISTOPHER
Chief Technology Officer
$179,796
@ $326.31 · 2025-06-09
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$230,023
@ $318.15 · 2025-06-04
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$141,758
@ $315.02 · 2025-05-29
MILLER JOHN M
Officer
$558,038
@ $310.02 · 2025-05-13
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$285,682
@ $304.24 · 2025-05-12
BUTTERMORE ROBERT L.
Officer
$518,651
@ $304.37 · 2025-05-12
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.58M
@ $304.18 · 2025-05-12
RIESTERER TERRY LEE
Officer
$760,321
@ $304.13 · 2025-05-12
FORDENWALT MATTHEW W
Officer
$147,504
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
HOUSE REBECCA WICKHEM
Officer
$1.48M
@ $295.01 · 2025-05-09
BULHO MATHEUS DE A G VIERA
Officer
$75,500
@ $257.68 · 2025-04-02
GENEREUX SCOTT A
Officer
$501,858
@ $286.78 · 2025-03-03
WOODS ISAAC
Officer and Treasurer
$248,810
@ $284.03 · 2025-02-28
MYERS TESSA M.
Officer
$351,364
@ $285.43 · 2025-02-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
ROK
FearGreed
😏Greed(64/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
ROK
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (64)
View CRM Full AnalysisView ROK Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs ROK

Is Salesforce, Inc. or Rockwell Automation, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to ROK's -117.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $221 vs. $480).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Rockwell Automation, Inc.?

ROK scores 69/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. ROK scores 5.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Rockwell Automation, Inc.?

ROK earns 18.9% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Rockwell Automation, Inc.'s?

CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to ROK's 84/100 (Very Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

CRM vs ROK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io