Compare Stocks › CRM vs RCL

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CRM is overvalued at $229, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -45%. RCL is undervalued at $307, with an intrinsic value of $413 and a margin of safety of 26%. Of the two, RCL has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$229.17
VS
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$307.18

Rewards

CRM
  • ★Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
RCL
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.02 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRM
    RCL
    • ⚠High leverage (1.87x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • ⚠8 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    RCL
    Valuation
    $17.73B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-50.00M
    9.40%
    FCF Yield
    -0.06%
    20.97
    Trailing P/E
    18.18
    14.31
    Forward P/E
    15.03
    Quality & Moat
    9.19%
    ROIC
    14.48%
    19.38%
    ROE
    41.29%
    77.28%
    Gross Margin
    50.25%
    0.82
    PEG Ratio
    1.24
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.81
    Net Debt / Equity
    1.87
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.12
    0.77%
    Dividend Yield
    1.95%
    CRM: 6Ties: 2RCL: 4
    CRMRCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    RCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-3.08
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-45.24B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RCL
    $7.94
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $7.91B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$62.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    45.4% Overvalued
    Price is 45.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $229.17
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RCL
    25.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 25.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $307.18
    Fair Value: $413.44
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

    +8.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.1%

    The market implies +8.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    RCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    RCL
    35/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RCL
    -2.85
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 9.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,582
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RCL
    Insiders 6.2%Institutions 84.4%Retail & Other 9.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,668
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.52M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $999,451
    @ $239.33 · 2026-09-18
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.71M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RCL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    8
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $81.43M
    BAYLEY MICHAEL W
    Officer
    $4.05M
    @ $315.99 · 2026-07-29
    MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
    Director
    $453,137
    @ $327.17 · 2026-02-17
    BETHGE LAURA H
    Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $326.21 · 2026-02-17
    LIBERTY JASON T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $29.71M
    @ $326.81 · 2026-02-13
    HOLTZ NAFTALI
    Chief Financial Officer
    $16.74M
    @ $327.39 · 2026-02-13
    PUJOL HENRY L
    Officer
    $1.46M
    @ $327.99 · 2026-02-13
    BAYLEY MICHAEL W
    Officer
    $26.15M
    @ $326.82 · 2026-02-13
    MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
    Director
    $309,936
    @ $281.76 · 2025-11-03
    SORENSEN VAGN O
    Director
    $3.40M
    @ $330.04 · 2025-08-19
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $4.98M
    @ $311.02 · 2025-08-06
    PUJOL HENRY L
    Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $329.47 · 2025-07-30
    LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $860,270
    @ $299.85 · 2025-06-27
    LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $687,500
    @ $275.00 · 2025-06-06
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $4.96M
    @ $253.10 · 2025-05-19
    MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
    Director
    $363,735
    @ $242.49 · 2025-05-12
    LIBERTY JASON T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $15.19M
    @ $261.95 · 2025-02-18
    HOLTZ NAFTALI
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.45M
    @ $261.62 · 2025-02-18
    BETHGE LAURA H
    Officer
    $3.93M
    @ $261.86 · 2025-02-18
    BAYLEY MICHAEL W
    Officer
    $12.88M
    @ $262.07 · 2025-02-18
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $5.01M
    @ $256.68 · 2025-02-13
    KULOVAARA HARRI U
    Officer
    $763,923
    @ $234.62 · 2024-11-20
    KULOVAARA HARRI U
    Officer
    $4.06M
    @ $209.58 · 2024-11-05
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RCL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    RCL
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView RCL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs RCL

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, RCL trades at a 25.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $413 vs. price $307), compared to CRM's -45.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $229).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?▼

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while RCL scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in financial distress?▼

    RCL's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 3.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?▼

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 9.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s -0.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?▼

    RCL earns 14.5% ROIC versus CRM's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s?▼

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to RCL's 73/100 (Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    CRM vs RCL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io