Compare StocksCRM vs RCL

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. RCL is undervalued at $313, with an intrinsic value of $458 and a margin of safety of 32%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$312.51

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
RCL
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $9.02 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRM
    RCL
    • High leverage (2.12x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    • 11 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    RCL
    Valuation
    $16.55B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-194.88M
    13.32%
    FCF Yield
    -0.23%
    17.57
    Trailing P/E
    19.07
    9.77
    Forward P/E
    15.61
    Quality & Moat
    9.61%
    ROIC
    11.95%
    16.91%
    ROE
    49.58%
    77.64%
    Gross Margin
    50.91%
    0.77
    PEG Ratio
    1.48
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.90
    Net Debt / Equity
    2.12
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.38
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.08
    1.09%
    Dividend Yield
    1.60%
    CRM: 8Ties: 1RCL: 3
    CRMRCL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    RCL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-7.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-117.14B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    RCL
    $7.94
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $7.91B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$62.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    44.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $151.78
    Fair Value: $273.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    RCL
    31.7% Margin of Safety
    Price is 31.7% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $312.51
    Fair Value: $457.80
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

    +3.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.8%

    The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    RCL

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    RCL
    35/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though roic consistency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    RCL
    -2.85
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,722
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    RCL
    Insiders 1.8%Institutions 90.3%Retail & Other 7.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,623
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    RCL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    HOLTZ NAFTALI
    Chief Financial Officer
    $749,000
    @ $140.00 · 2024-08-02
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.30M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    RCL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $88.33M
    MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
    Director
    $453,137
    @ $327.17 · 2026-02-17
    BETHGE LAURA H
    Officer
    $2.56M
    @ $326.21 · 2026-02-17
    PUJOL HENRY L
    Officer
    $1.46M
    @ $327.99 · 2026-02-13
    BAYLEY MICHAEL W
    Officer
    $26.15M
    @ $326.82 · 2026-02-13
    LIBERTY JASON T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $29.71M
    @ $326.81 · 2026-02-13
    HOLTZ NAFTALI
    Chief Financial Officer
    $16.74M
    @ $327.39 · 2026-02-13
    MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
    Director
    $309,936
    @ $281.76 · 2025-11-03
    SORENSEN VAGN O
    Director
    $3.40M
    @ $330.04 · 2025-08-19
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $4.98M
    @ $311.02 · 2025-08-06
    PUJOL HENRY L
    Officer
    $1.72M
    @ $329.47 · 2025-07-30
    LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $860,270
    @ $299.85 · 2025-06-27
    LAKE ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $687,500
    @ $275.00 · 2025-06-06
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $4.96M
    @ $253.10 · 2025-05-19
    MONTIEL MARITZA GOMEZ
    Director
    $363,735
    @ $242.49 · 2025-05-12
    BAYLEY MICHAEL W
    Officer
    $12.88M
    @ $262.07 · 2025-02-18
    LIBERTY JASON T
    Chief Executive Officer
    $15.19M
    @ $261.95 · 2025-02-18
    HOLTZ NAFTALI
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.45M
    @ $261.62 · 2025-02-18
    BETHGE LAURA H
    Officer
    $3.93M
    @ $261.86 · 2025-02-18
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $5.01M
    @ $256.68 · 2025-02-13
    KULOVAARA HARRI U
    Officer
    $763,923
    @ $234.62 · 2024-11-20
    KULOVAARA HARRI U
    Officer
    $4.06M
    @ $209.58 · 2024-11-05
    PUJOL HENRY L
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $208.51 · 2024-10-30
    BETHGE LAURA H
    Officer
    $518,446
    @ $168.71 · 2024-08-29
    SORENSEN VAGN O
    Director
    $919,300
    @ $158.50 · 2024-08-15
    FAIN RICHARD DAVID
    Director
    $3.02M
    @ $156.25 · 2024-07-30
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    RCL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
    RCL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView RCL Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs RCL

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to RCL's 31.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $458 vs. $313).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while RCL scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. in financial distress?

    RCL's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s -0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.?

    RCL earns 11.9% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.'s?

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to RCL's 73/100 (Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.