Compare StocksCRM vs PRU

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99
VS
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
$92.51

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
PRU
  • 3 insider purchases with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • FCF yield of 39.2% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • Trailing P/E of 9.3x is 34% below the historical average of 14.1x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

CRM
    PRU
    • Prudential Financial, Inc. scores only 3/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.17 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    PRU
    Valuation
    $16.37B
    Free Cash Flow
    $12.62B
    8.96%
    FCF Yield
    39.20%
    25.00
    Trailing P/E
    9.26
    13.08
    Forward P/E
    6.03
    Quality & Moat
    8.21%
    ROIC
    6.30%
    12.61%
    ROE
    10.05%
    77.68%
    Gross Margin
    29.60%
    1.40
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.30
    Debt / Equity
    1.24
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.65
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.63
    0.90%
    Dividend Yield
    5.89%
    CRM: 5Ties: 2PRU: 4
    CRMPRU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    PRU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-5.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-76.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    PRU
    $0.92
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Mediocre Allocator
    Σ Retained
    $3.13B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.88B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    13.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $194.99
    Fair Value: $224.03
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    PRU
    57.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $92.51
    Fair Value: $215.06
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.3%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    PRU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $93?

    -2.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -21.9%

    The market implies -2.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -21.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    PRU
    3/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    PRU
    -2.12
    Possible Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,962
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    PRU
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 36.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,813
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.38M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    PRU
    3
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $168,840
    STODDARD THOMAS D
    Director
    $25,742
    @ $102.97 · 2026-02-17
    WOLK JOSEPH J
    Director
    $42,128
    @ $105.32 · 2026-02-11
    CHAPPUIS JACQUES P
    Officer
    $100,970
    @ $100.97 · 2026-02-06
    DI SIBIO CARMINE
    Director
    $22,208
    @ $111.04 · 2025-02-20
    FEENEY CAROLINE
    Officer
    $42,364
    @ $116.38 · 2024-12-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.55M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $571,202
    @ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $557,034
    @ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    PRU
    0
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.23M
    FEENEY CAROLINE
    Officer
    $762,215
    @ $116.28 · 2025-12-11
    SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
    Officer
    $861,520
    @ $107.69 · 2025-12-02
    LOWREY CHARLES F
    Chairman of the Board
    $5.17M
    @ $107.39 · 2025-11-10
    KAPPLER ANN M
    General Counsel
    $438,600
    @ $109.65 · 2025-08-29
    SULLIVAN ANDREW F
    Officer
    $635,880
    @ $105.98 · 2025-03-12
    TODMAN MICHAEL A
    Director
    $333,291
    @ $112.98 · 2025-02-07
    SULLIVAN ANDREW F
    Officer
    $3.19M
    @ $124.10 · 2024-11-07
    LOWREY CHARLES F
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.45M
    @ $126.29 · 2024-11-07
    FALZON ROBERT M
    Officer
    $6.76M
    @ $128.26 · 2024-11-06
    FEENEY CAROLINE
    Officer
    $133,167
    @ $119.97 · 2024-09-03
    KAPPLER ANN M
    General Counsel
    $322,028
    @ $113.43 · 2024-08-21
    FALZON ROBERT M
    Officer
    $15.43M
    @ $118.57 · 2024-05-13
    SCHMIDT TIMOTHY L
    Officer
    $604,934
    @ $116.58 · 2024-05-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    PRU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    PRU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView PRU Full Analysis
    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io