Compare StocksCRM vs PNR

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Pentair plc (PNR)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$183.82
VS
PNR
Pentair plc
$79.10

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.49 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PNR
  • Pentair plc scores 77/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 38.9% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.33 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
PNR
Valuation
$16.37B
Free Cash Flow
$574.21M
10.88%
FCF Yield
4.49%
23.60
Trailing P/E
19.87
12.31
Forward P/E
13.60
Quality & Moat
8.21%
ROIC
12.78%
12.61%
ROE
17.05%
77.68%
Gross Margin
41.22%
1.32
PEG Ratio
1.53
Balance Sheet Safety
0.30
Debt / Equity
0.55
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.65
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.83
0.96%
Dividend Yield
1.31%
CRM: 7Ties: 1PNR: 4
CRMPNR

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

PNR

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-5.96
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-87.37B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PNR
$6.66
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.44B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
28.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 28.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $183.82
Fair Value: $257.23
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PNR
0.8% Margin of Safety
Price is 0.8% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $79.10
Fair Value: $79.75
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

+8.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.3%

The market implies +8.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

PNR

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $79?

+9.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.2%

The market implies +9.4% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +11.2%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PNR
77/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PNR
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 95.7%Retail & Other 1.3%
No. of Institutional Holders3,813
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PNR
Insiders 1.0%Institutions 94.9%Retail & Other 4.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,142
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
2
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PNR
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $41.42M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$543,378
@ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$572,842
@ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PNR
2
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.88M
ROLCHIGO PHILIP M
Chief Technology Officer
$670,207
@ $103.22 · 2026-02-25
SPEETZEN MICHAEL T
Director
$699,945
@ $99.99 · 2026-02-11
GLENN T MICHAEL
Director
$684,196
@ $104.33 · 2025-12-01
FISHMAN ROBERT P
Chief Financial Officer
$820,765
@ $105.42 · 2025-11-14
JONES DAVID A. JR.
Director
$589,827
@ $89.94 · 2025-04-28
PILLA STEPHEN J
Officer
$706,608
@ $98.14 · 2025-02-14
GLENN T MICHAEL
Director
$437,433
@ $109.14 · 2024-12-02
ROLCHIGO PHILIP M
Chief Technology Officer
$357,616
@ $99.67 · 2024-11-01
JONES DAVID A. JR.
Director
$355,590
@ $88.72 · 2024-07-31
PEDRETTI JEROME O
Officer
$2.09M
@ $84.45 · 2024-05-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(32/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PNR
FearGreed
😨Fear(22/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
PNR
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (22)
View CRM Full AnalysisView PNR Full Analysis
CRM vs PNR: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io