Compare StocksCRM vs PCG

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs PG&E Corporation (PCG)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99
VS
PCG
PG&E Corporation
$18.19

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
PCG

    Risks

    CRM
      PCG
      • Share count has increased by 11% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
      • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.42 of market value — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
      • Net debt/EBITDA of 6.1x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      CRM
      PCG
      Valuation
      $16.37B
      Free Cash Flow
      $-3.41B
      8.96%
      FCF Yield
      -8.54%
      25.00
      Trailing P/E
      15.42
      13.08
      Forward P/E
      10.08
      Quality & Moat
      8.21%
      ROIC
      4.46%
      12.61%
      ROE
      7.91%
      77.68%
      Gross Margin
      39.58%
      1.40
      PEG Ratio
      N/A
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.30
      Debt / Equity
      1.87
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      0.65
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      6.07
      0.90%
      Dividend Yield
      1.10%
      CRM: 7Ties: 1PCG: 3
      CRMPCG

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      CRM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      PCG

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      CRM
      $-5.25
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $14.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-76.99B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      PCG
      $0.42
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Value Destroyer
      Σ Retained
      $7.07B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$3.00B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      CRM
      13.0% Margin of Safety
      Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
      Current Price: $194.99
      Fair Value: $224.03
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      PCG
      843.1% Overvalued
      Price is 843.1% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $18.19
      Fair Value: $1.93
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      CRM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

      +11.1%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +0.3%

      The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      PCG

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      CRM
      58/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      PCG
      33/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      CRM
      -2.73
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      PCG
      -2.69
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      CRM
      Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,962
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      PCG
      Insiders 0.2%Institutions 99.3%Retail & Other 0.4%
      No. of Institutional Holders1,202
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      CRM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      3
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $26.38M
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,722
      @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
      MORFIT G MASON
      Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
      $25.02M
      @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $865,827
      @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      PCG
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $119,700
      LARSEN JOHN O
      Director
      $119,700
      @ $15.96 · 2025-11-04
      DENAULT LEO PAUL
      Director
      $100,548
      @ $15.96 · 2025-03-11
      HERNANDEZ CARLOS M.
      Director
      $49,989
      @ $15.91 · 2025-02-25
      BAHRI RAJAT
      Director
      $50,054
      @ $15.79 · 2025-02-25
      DENECOUR JESSICA L
      Director
      $21,269
      @ $15.79 · 2025-02-21
      HARRIS ARNO LOCKHEART
      Director
      $100,052
      @ $15.66 · 2025-02-20
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      CRM
      1
      Sells (3M)
      19
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $42.55M
      KROES NEELIE
      Director
      $929,276
      @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
      HARRIS G PARKER
      Officer and Director
      $31.61M
      @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $575,140
      @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $590,102
      @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $567,631
      @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $550,430
      @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $558,810
      @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $536,322
      @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $548,796
      @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.10M
      @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $547,344
      @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $539,533
      @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $555,001
      @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $552,798
      @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $545,384
      @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $543,378
      @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $572,842
      @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $571,202
      @ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $557,034
      @ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      PCG
      3
      Sells (3M)
      5
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $2.68M
      COOPER KERRY WHORTON
      Director
      $46,700
      @ $18.68 · 2026-03-17
      PETERMAN CARLA J
      Officer
      $582,002
      @ $18.31 · 2026-03-16
      SINGH SUMEET
      Officer
      $1.02M
      @ $18.32 · 2026-03-05
      GLICKMAN JASON M.
      Divisional Officer
      $470,094
      @ $15.95 · 2025-10-30
      PETERMAN CARLA J
      Officer
      $562,579
      @ $17.30 · 2025-04-29
      GLICKMAN JASON M.
      Divisional Officer
      $632,155
      @ $15.71 · 2025-03-10
      WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
      Officer
      $242,891
      @ $16.21 · 2025-03-06
      SANTOS MARLENE
      Officer of Subsidiary Company
      $2.06M
      @ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
      PETERMAN CARLA J
      Officer
      $532,369
      @ $16.37 · 2025-03-04
      WILLIAMS STEPHANIE N.
      Officer
      $707,170
      @ $18.32 · 2024-08-15
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      CRM
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(37/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      PCG
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(57/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      CRM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
      PCG
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
      View CRM Full AnalysisView PCG Full Analysis