Compare StocksCRM vs NOC

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99
VS
NOC
Northrop Grumman Corporation
$714.15

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
NOC
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

CRM
    NOC
    • Gross margin of 19.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • 13 insider sales totaling $26.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    NOC
    Valuation
    $16.37B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.90B
    8.96%
    FCF Yield
    2.85%
    25.00
    Trailing P/E
    24.57
    13.08
    Forward P/E
    23.78
    Quality & Moat
    8.21%
    ROIC
    15.85%
    12.61%
    ROE
    25.08%
    77.68%
    Gross Margin
    19.82%
    1.40
    PEG Ratio
    1.62
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.30
    Debt / Equity
    1.07
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.65
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.98
    0.90%
    Dividend Yield
    1.29%
    CRM: 7Ties: 2NOC: 3
    CRMNOC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    NOC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-5.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-76.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    NOC
    $-0.38
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $6.82B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-2.60B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    13.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $194.99
    Fair Value: $224.03
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    NOC
    28.5% Overvalued
    Price is 28.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $714.15
    Fair Value: $555.65
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.3%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    NOC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $714?

    +12.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +17.1%

    The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    NOC
    68/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    NOC
    -2.45
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,962
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    NOC
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 83.5%Retail & Other 16.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,192
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.38M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    NOC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.55M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $571,202
    @ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $557,034
    @ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    NOC
    13
    Sells (3M)
    25
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $35.39M
    SIMPSON KATHRYN G.
    General Counsel
    $650,385
    @ $745.00 · 2026-03-02
    ROEDER ROSHAN S.
    Officer
    $1.26M
    @ $720.00 · 2026-02-27
    HARDESTY MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $107,748
    @ $732.98 · 2026-02-19
    ROEDER ROSHAN S.
    Officer
    $372,541
    @ $727.62 · 2026-02-19
    SIMPSON KATHRYN G.
    General Counsel
    $141,158
    @ $727.62 · 2026-02-19
    DAVIES BENJAMIN R
    Officer
    $1.58M
    @ $719.62 · 2026-02-18
    HARDESTY MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $501,609
    @ $701.55 · 2026-02-17
    ROEDER ROSHAN S.
    Officer
    $223,414
    @ $702.56 · 2026-02-17
    SIMPSON KATHRYN G.
    General Counsel
    $547,294
    @ $702.56 · 2026-02-17
    HARDESTY MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $550,411
    @ $702.95 · 2026-02-13
    WARDEN KATHY J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.18M
    @ $708.82 · 2026-02-06
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $65,029
    @ $684.52 · 2026-02-02
    WARDEN KATHY J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.04M
    @ $604.50 · 2026-01-06
    ROEDER ROSHAN S.
    Officer
    $46,649
    @ $555.35 · 2025-12-09
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $54,716
    @ $564.08 · 2025-11-24
    JONES THOMAS H.
    Officer
    $382,725
    @ $525.00 · 2025-07-17
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $16,720
    @ $506.67 · 2025-07-07
    JONES THOMAS H.
    Officer
    $368,706
    @ $505.77 · 2025-06-13
    FLEMING ROBERT J
    Officer
    $1.77M
    @ $505.77 · 2025-06-13
    WARDEN KATHY J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.65M
    @ $502.18 · 2025-06-13
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $16,120
    @ $488.48 · 2025-06-05
    ROEDER ROSHAN S.
    Officer
    $485,590
    @ $490.00 · 2025-06-04
    JONES THOMAS H.
    Officer
    $349,920
    @ $480.00 · 2025-05-30
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $16,293
    @ $493.73 · 2025-05-05
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $15,850
    @ $480.30 · 2025-04-07
    WARDEN KATHY J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $475.65 · 2025-03-06
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $15,631
    @ $473.67 · 2025-03-05
    DAVIES BENJAMIN R
    Officer
    $213,788
    @ $460.75 · 2025-02-28
    HARDESTY MICHAEL A
    Officer
    $875,873
    @ $453.59 · 2025-02-24
    SIMPSON KATHRYN G.
    General Counsel
    $444,098
    @ $429.08 · 2025-02-20
    DAVIES BENJAMIN R
    Officer
    $82,383
    @ $429.08 · 2025-02-20
    SIMPSON KATHRYN G.
    General Counsel
    $395,916
    @ $445.35 · 2025-02-18
    DAVIES BENJAMIN R
    Officer
    $130,488
    @ $445.35 · 2025-02-18
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $15,843
    @ $480.09 · 2025-02-05
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $15,072
    @ $456.73 · 2025-01-06
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $15,886
    @ $481.39 · 2024-12-05
    DAVIES BENJAMIN R
    Officer
    $616,067
    @ $532.93 · 2024-11-11
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $16,833
    @ $510.09 · 2024-11-05
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $17,675
    @ $535.61 · 2024-10-07
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $17,151
    @ $519.73 · 2024-09-05
    WELSH MARK A. III
    Director
    $17,546
    @ $516.06 · 2024-08-29
    JONES THOMAS H.
    Officer
    $695,000
    @ $500.00 · 2024-08-02
    JONES THOMAS H.
    Officer
    $1.30M
    @ $469.25 · 2024-07-26
    ROEDER ROSHAN S.
    Officer
    $429,429
    @ $471.90 · 2024-05-20
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    NOC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(61/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    NOC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (61)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView NOC Full Analysis
    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io