Compare Stocks › CRM vs MDT

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Medtronic plc (MDT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CRM is overvalued at $229, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -45%. MDT is overvalued at $97, with an intrinsic value of $80 and a margin of safety of -20%. Of the two, MDT has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$229.17
VS
MDT
Medtronic plc
$96.54

Rewards

CRM
  • ★Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
MDT
  • ★Gross margin of 65.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.25 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
MDT
Valuation
$17.73B
Free Cash Flow
$5.41B
9.40%
FCF Yield
4.38%
20.97
Trailing P/E
23.72
14.31
Forward P/E
15.07
Quality & Moat
9.19%
ROIC
7.26%
19.38%
ROE
10.65%
77.28%
Gross Margin
65.27%
0.82
PEG Ratio
1.73
Balance Sheet Safety
0.81
Net Debt / Equity
0.38
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.86
0.77%
Dividend Yield
2.98%
CRM: 8Ties: 1MDT: 3
CRMMDT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MDT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-3.08
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-45.24B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MDT
$6.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.25B
Δ Market Cap
+$13.96B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
45.4% Overvalued
Price is 45.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $229.17
Fair Value: $157.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MDT
20.4% Overvalued
Price is 20.4% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $96.54
Fair Value: $80.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

+8.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.1%

The market implies +8.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MDT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $97?

+10.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.5%

The market implies +10.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MDT
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MDT
-2.58
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 9.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,582
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MDT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 88.8%Retail & Other 10.9%
No. of Institutional Holders2,955
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
1
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.52M
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$999,451
@ $239.33 · 2026-09-18
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MDT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
JELLISON WILLIAM R
Director
$462,750
@ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
1
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $33.71M
CONWAY CRAIG
Director
$1.17M
@ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MDT
1
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.92M
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$138,883
@ $93.65 · 2026-09-16
WALTER MATTHEW R.
Officer
$257,931
@ $83.15 · 2026-07-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$336,965
@ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$5.13M
@ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
SMITH GREGORY L
Officer
$3.06M
@ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$788,048
@ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$1.12M
@ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$792,038
@ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MDT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
MDT
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View CRM Full AnalysisView MDT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs MDT

Is Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MDT trades at a -20.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $80 vs. price $97), compared to CRM's -45.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $229).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc?▼

MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc?▼

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 9.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Medtronic plc's 4.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc?▼

CRM earns 9.2% ROIC versus MDT's 7.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Medtronic plc's?▼

CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to MDT's 49/100 (Borderline). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

CRM vs MDT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io