Compare StocksCRM vs MDT

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Medtronic plc (MDT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. MDT is fairly valued at $79, with an intrinsic value of $79 and a margin of safety of 0%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
MDT
Medtronic plc
$79.34

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
MDT
  • Gross margin of 65.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
MDT
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
13.32%
FCF Yield
N/A
17.57
Trailing P/E
21.05
9.77
Forward P/E
12.38
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
7.92%
16.91%
ROE
9.93%
77.64%
Gross Margin
65.38%
0.77
PEG Ratio
1.60
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
0.40
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.95
1.09%
Dividend Yield
3.54%
CRM: 6Ties: 1MDT: 3
CRMMDT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MDT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-7.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-117.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MDT
$16.10
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.23B
Δ Market Cap
+$19.72B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
44.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.78
Fair Value: $273.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MDT
0.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 0.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $79.34
Fair Value: $79.42
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+3.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MDT

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MDT
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MDT
-2.59
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MDT
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.5%Retail & Other 10.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,027
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MDT
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $462,750
JELLISON WILLIAM R
Director
$462,750
@ $92.55 · 2025-08-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MDT
1
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.32M
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$336,965
@ $80.44 · 2026-06-08
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$5.13M
@ $97.71 · 2026-02-19
SMITH GREGORY L
Officer
$3.06M
@ $101.95 · 2025-11-19
KIIL HARRY SKIP
Officer
$788,048
@ $91.58 · 2025-09-03
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$1.12M
@ $90.00 · 2025-01-24
WALL BRETT A
Officer
$792,038
@ $80.41 · 2025-01-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MDT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
MDT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View CRM Full AnalysisView MDT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs MDT

Is Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to MDT's 0.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $79 vs. $79).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc?

MDT scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. MDT scores 2.9 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Medtronic plc?

CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus MDT's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Medtronic plc's?

CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to MDT's 49/100 (Borderline). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

CRM vs MDT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io