Compare Stocks › CRM vs LUV

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CRM is overvalued at $229, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -45%. LUV is undervalued at $42, with an intrinsic value of $66 and a margin of safety of 35%. Of the two, LUV has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$229.17
VS
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
$42.43

Rewards

CRM
  • ★Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
LUV
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Trailing P/E of 20.7x is 50% below the historical average of 41.2x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • ★PEG ratio of 0.22 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

CRM
    LUV
    • ⚠Gross margin of 22.1% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 2 out of 2 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • ⚠Beneish M-Score of -1.64 flags financial patterns consistent with potential earnings manipulation — warrants further investigation.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    LUV
    Valuation
    $17.73B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-612.88M
    9.40%
    FCF Yield
    -2.95%
    20.97
    Trailing P/E
    20.70
    14.31
    Forward P/E
    10.16
    Quality & Moat
    9.19%
    ROIC
    7.88%
    19.38%
    ROE
    13.94%
    77.28%
    Gross Margin
    22.14%
    0.82
    PEG Ratio
    0.22
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.81
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.44
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.21
    0.77%
    Dividend Yield
    1.70%
    CRM: 5Ties: 2LUV: 5
    CRMLUV

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    LUV

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-3.08
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-45.24B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LUV
    $11.48
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $114.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    +$1.31B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    45.4% Overvalued
    Price is 45.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $229.17
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LUV
    31.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 31.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $42.43
    Fair Value: $61.80
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

    +8.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.1%

    The market implies +8.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    LUV

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LUV
    37/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LUV
    -1.64
    Likely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 9.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,582
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LUV
    Insiders 1.0%Institutions 94.6%Retail & Other 4.4%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,197
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.52M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $999,451
    @ $239.33 · 2026-09-18
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LUV
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    SARETSKY GREGG A
    Director
    $100,447
    @ $30.03 · 2025-08-06
    FEINBERG SARAH
    Director
    $45,008
    @ $30.01 · 2025-08-05
    SARETSKY GREGG A
    Director
    $100,169
    @ $27.29 · 2025-04-30
    BREBER PIERRE R.
    Director
    $268,877
    @ $26.89 · 2025-04-29
    HESS DAVID P
    Director
    $198,900
    @ $26.52 · 2025-04-28
    FEINBERG SARAH
    Director
    $15,740
    @ $31.48 · 2025-03-14
    WATSON PATRICIA A
    Director
    $99,935
    @ $30.58 · 2025-03-13
    REYNOLDS CHRISTOPHER P.
    Director
    $99,955
    @ $30.68 · 2025-03-13
    CUSH C. DAVID
    Director
    $150,150
    @ $30.03 · 2025-03-12
    ATHERTON LISA M
    Director
    $3,691
    @ $31.28 · 2025-01-30
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.71M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LUV
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $302,056
    JONES JUSTIN
    Officer
    $302,056
    @ $37.36 · 2025-12-05
    RUTHERFORD LINDA B
    Officer
    $132,386
    @ $34.39 · 2024-12-06
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LUV
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    LUV
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView LUV Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs LUV

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or Southwest Airlines Co. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, LUV trades at a 35.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $66 vs. price $42), compared to CRM's -45.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $229).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Southwest Airlines Co.?▼

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while LUV scores 37/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Southwest Airlines Co. in financial distress?▼

    LUV's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 3.2 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Southwest Airlines Co.?▼

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 9.4% free cash flow yield, compared to Southwest Airlines Co.'s -3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Southwest Airlines Co.?▼

    CRM earns 9.2% ROIC versus LUV's 7.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Southwest Airlines Co.'s?▼

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to LUV's 46/100 (Borderline). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    Does Southwest Airlines Co. have accounting red flags?▼

    LUV's Beneish M-Score of -1.6 flags it as a likely earnings manipulator (above the -1.78 threshold). By contrast, CRM scores -2.7, within the normal range. The Beneish model detects aggressive accounting through eight financial ratios.