Compare StocksCRM vs LRCX

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Lam Research Corporation (LRCX)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$183.82
VS
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
$256.64

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.49 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
LRCX
  • Lam Research Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lam Research Corporation scores 81/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 28.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

CRM
    LRCX
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
    • Trailing P/E of 48.5x is 90% above the historical average of 25.5x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    LRCX
    Valuation
    $16.37B
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.35B
    10.88%
    FCF Yield
    1.36%
    23.60
    Trailing P/E
    48.51
    12.31
    Forward P/E
    32.43
    Quality & Moat
    8.21%
    ROIC
    41.92%
    12.61%
    ROE
    50.62%
    77.68%
    Gross Margin
    49.98%
    1.32
    PEG Ratio
    1.19
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.30
    Debt / Equity
    0.35
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.65
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.13
    0.96%
    Dividend Yield
    0.41%
    CRM: 7Ties: 1LRCX: 4
    CRMLRCX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    LRCX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-5.96
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-87.37B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LRCX
    $15.03
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $10.62B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$159.61B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    28.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 28.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $183.82
    Fair Value: $257.23
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LRCX
    17.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 17.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $256.64
    Fair Value: $312.32
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

    +8.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.3%

    The market implies +8.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    LRCX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $257?

    +22.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +25.6%

    The market implies +22.6% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LRCX
    81/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by margin stability. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LRCX
    -2.28
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 95.7%Retail & Other 1.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,813
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LRCX
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 88.7%Retail & Other 11.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,299
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    2
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LRCX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    HARTER AVA
    Officer
    $602.00
    @ $66.89 · 2025-04-08
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    17
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $41.42M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LRCX
    6
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $72.89M
    HARTER AVA
    Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $258.66 · 2026-04-27
    HARTER AVA
    Officer
    $333,990
    @ $222.66 · 2026-03-04
    BETTINGER DOUGLAS R
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.21M
    @ $224.03 · 2026-03-04
    HARTER AVA
    Officer
    $930,000
    @ $232.50 · 2026-03-02
    BETTINGER DOUGLAS R
    Chief Financial Officer
    $9.28M
    @ $230.22 · 2026-03-02
    BRANDT ERIC K
    Director
    $7.90M
    @ $225.60 · 2026-02-06
    ARCHER TIMOTHY M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $26.76M
    @ $163.86 · 2025-12-17
    BETTINGER DOUGLAS R
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.04M
    @ $150.60 · 2025-11-14
    MAYER BETHANY J
    Director
    $4,786
    @ $159.53 · 2025-11-07
    MAYER BETHANY J
    Director
    $207,667
    @ $159.99 · 2025-11-03
    HARTER AVA
    Officer
    $1.42M
    @ $157.47 · 2025-10-27
    VAHEDI VAHID
    Officer
    $7.25M
    @ $138.90 · 2025-10-13
    VARADARAJAN SESHASAYEE
    Officer
    $9.91M
    @ $90.00 · 2025-02-20
    MAYER BETHANY J
    Director
    $124,757
    @ $75.15 · 2024-11-01
    CORREIA CHRISTINA
    Officer
    $528,929
    @ $817.51 · 2024-10-01
    FERNANDES NEIL J
    Officer
    $1.71M
    @ $1056.99 · 2024-07-12
    CORREIA CHRISTINA
    Officer
    $687,282
    @ $1062.26 · 2024-07-01
    ARCHER TIMOTHY M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.67M
    @ $1067.12 · 2024-06-28
    ARCHER TIMOTHY M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $6.04M
    @ $1078.53 · 2024-06-28
    ARCHER TIMOTHY M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.33M
    @ $1070.39 · 2024-06-28
    FERNANDES NEIL J
    Officer
    $4.65M
    @ $1055.76 · 2024-06-27
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(32/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LRCX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (32)
    LRCX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView LRCX Full Analysis
    CRM vs LRCX: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io