Compare StocksCRM vs LHX

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. LHX is undervalued at $295, with an intrinsic value of $423 and a margin of safety of 30%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$294.82

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
LHX
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 12.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.36 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRM
    LHX
    • 9 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    LHX
    Valuation
    $16.55B
    Free Cash Flow
    N/A
    13.32%
    FCF Yield
    N/A
    17.57
    Trailing P/E
    31.98
    9.77
    Forward P/E
    21.63
    Quality & Moat
    9.61%
    ROIC
    3.20%
    16.91%
    ROE
    7.01%
    77.64%
    Gross Margin
    30.41%
    0.77
    PEG Ratio
    1.78
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.90
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.30
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.38
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    3.23
    1.09%
    Dividend Yield
    0.92%
    CRM: 8Ties: 1LHX: 1
    CRMLHX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    LHX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-7.99
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-117.14B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    LHX
    $9.04
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.68B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$15.16B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    44.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $151.78
    Fair Value: $273.71
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    LHX
    30.3% Margin of Safety
    Price is 30.3% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $294.82
    Fair Value: $423.25
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

    +3.6%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.8%

    The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    LHX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    LHX
    59/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    LHX
    -2.38
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,722
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    LHX
    Insiders 0.4%Institutions 89.4%Retail & Other 10.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,134
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.38M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    LHX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Sells (3M)
    15
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.30M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    LHX
    1
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $65.34M
    RAKITA MELANIE
    Officer
    $676,781
    @ $310.45 · 2026-05-05
    RAMBEAU JON
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $370.32 · 2026-03-02
    MEHTA SAMIR
    Officer
    $2.05M
    @ $370.32 · 2026-03-02
    RAKITA MELANIE
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $348.38 · 2026-03-02
    MEHTA SAMIR
    Officer
    $1.64M
    @ $338.85 · 2026-02-05
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.27M
    @ $301.05 · 2025-11-13
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $23.23M
    @ $279.90 · 2025-09-12
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.82M
    @ $269.52 · 2025-08-11
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $19.52M
    @ $271.14 · 2025-07-29
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.76M
    @ $248.39 · 2025-06-12
    ZOISS EDWARD J
    President
    $490,000
    @ $245.00 · 2025-05-27
    RAMBEAU JON
    Officer
    $718,228
    @ $226.00 · 2025-03-10
    ZOISS EDWARD J
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $211.68 · 2025-03-07
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $288,412
    @ $210.06 · 2024-12-30
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $376,879
    @ $213.65 · 2024-12-23
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $394,466
    @ $223.62 · 2024-12-16
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $845,000
    @ $260.00 · 2024-11-08
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $740,815
    @ $247.93 · 2024-11-04
    KUBASIK CHRISTOPHER E
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.30M
    @ $248.11 · 2024-10-31
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $731,104
    @ $244.68 · 2024-10-02
    NIEBERGALL ROSS S.
    Officer
    $707,200
    @ $236.68 · 2024-09-03
    MIKUEN SCOTT T
    General Counsel
    $6.15M
    @ $233.01 · 2024-07-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    LHX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(44/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
    LHX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (44)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView LHX Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs LHX

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or L3Harris Technologies, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to LHX's 30.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $423 vs. $295).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or L3Harris Technologies, Inc.?

    LHX scores 59/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

    CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LHX scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or L3Harris Technologies, Inc.?

    CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus LHX's 3.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or L3Harris Technologies, Inc.'s?

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to LHX's 84/100 (Very Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.