Compare StocksCRM vs JKHY

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CRM is undervalued at $152, with a DCF intrinsic value of $274 and a margin of safety of 45%. JKHY is fairly valued at $126, with an intrinsic value of $141 and a margin of safety of 10%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78
VS
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
$126.23

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
JKHY
  • Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. scores 88/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
JKHY
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$373.41M
13.32%
FCF Yield
4.16%
17.57
Trailing P/E
17.63
9.77
Forward P/E
17.80
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
21.32%
16.91%
ROE
24.89%
77.64%
Gross Margin
44.06%
0.77
PEG Ratio
1.76
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
0.05
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.16
1.09%
Dividend Yield
1.84%
CRM: 5Ties: 2JKHY: 5
CRMJKHY

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

JKHY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-7.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-117.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
JKHY
$0.67
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Mediocre Allocator
Σ Retained
$736.5M
Δ Market Cap
+$496.6M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
44.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 44.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.78
Fair Value: $273.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
JKHY
10.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 10.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $126.23
Fair Value: $140.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+3.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

JKHY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $126?

+7.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.4%

The market implies +7.7% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +10.4%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
JKHY
88/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
JKHY
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,722
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
JKHY
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 106.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,098
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
JKHY
2
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $317,135
ADELSON GREGORY R.
Chief Executive Officer
$266,840
@ $133.42 · 2026-05-14
CARSLEY MIMI
Chief Financial Officer
$50,295
@ $134.12 · 2026-05-14
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
JKHY
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $4.50M
FOSS DAVID B
Director
$3.50M
@ $174.92 · 2025-12-01
MCLACHLAN SHANON G.
Chief Operating Officer
$36,508
@ $160.83 · 2025-11-10
FOSS DAVID B
Director
$966,878
@ $167.28 · 2025-08-04
SWEARINGEN RENEE ANN
Officer
$180,891
@ $179.10 · 2025-05-13
MCLACHLAN SHANON G.
Chief Operating Officer
$44,137
@ $179.42 · 2025-05-13
FOSS DAVID B
Officer and Director
$2.71M
@ $180.74 · 2025-05-12
MORGAN CRAIG KEITH
General Counsel
$900,816
@ $180.16 · 2025-05-12
FOSS DAVID B
Officer and Director
$3.22M
@ $171.32 · 2024-11-19
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
JKHY
FearGreed
😨Fear(28/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
JKHY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (28)
View CRM Full AnalysisView JKHY Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs JKHY

Is Salesforce, Inc. or Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 44.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $274 vs. price $152), compared to JKHY's 10.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $141 vs. $126).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.?

JKHY scores 88/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. JKHY scores 11.7 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.?

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.'s 4.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.?

JKHY earns 21.3% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.'s?

JKHY's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). JKHY has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.