Compare StocksCRM vs INTC

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CRM is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -59%. INTC is overvalued at $101, with an intrinsic value of $6 and a margin of safety of -1509%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$250.54
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$101.05

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    CRM
      INTC
      • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
      • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
      • FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      CRM
      INTC
      Valuation
      $17.73B
      Free Cash Flow
      $4.87B
      8.60%
      FCF Yield
      0.91%
      23.41
      Trailing P/E
      N/A
      15.64
      Forward P/E
      49.42
      Quality & Moat
      9.19%
      ROIC
      3.57%
      19.38%
      ROE
      -10.71%
      77.28%
      Gross Margin
      38.87%
      0.87
      PEG Ratio
      1.36
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.81
      Net Debt / Equity
      0.20
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.40
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      1.24
      0.69%
      Dividend Yield
      0.00%
      CRM: 8Ties: 1INTC: 2
      CRMINTC

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      CRM

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      CRM
      $-1.73
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $14.67B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-25.39B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      CRM
      59.0% Overvalued
      Price is 59.0% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $250.54
      Fair Value: $157.57
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $101.05
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      CRM

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $251?

      +9.4%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +2.2%

      The market implies +9.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

      Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

      INTC

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

      +31.8%
      Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

      Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      CRM
      58/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      CRM
      -2.73
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      INTC
      -2.83
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      CRM
      Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 9.5%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,511
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      INTC
      Insiders 14.0%Institutions 62.5%Retail & Other 23.5%
      No. of Institutional Holders4,435
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      CRM
      0
      Buys (3M)
      4
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $26.52M
      ALBER LAURA
      Director
      $500,266
      @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,178
      @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
      KIRK DAVID BLAIR
      Director
      $500,722
      @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
      MORFIT G MASON
      Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
      $25.02M
      @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      INTC
      1
      Buys (3M)
      2
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $10.25M
      TAN LIP-BU
      Chief Executive Officer
      $10.00M
      @ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      CRM
      1
      Sells (3M)
      14
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $40.38M
      CONWAY CRAIG
      Director
      $1.17M
      @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
      KROES NEELIE
      Director
      $929,276
      @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
      HARRIS G PARKER
      Officer and Director
      $31.61M
      @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $575,140
      @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $590,102
      @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $567,631
      @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $550,430
      @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $558,810
      @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $536,322
      @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $548,796
      @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $1.10M
      @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $547,344
      @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $539,533
      @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
      BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
      Chief Executive Officer
      $555,001
      @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      INTC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      3
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $7.47M
      CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
      Chief Technology Officer
      $2.49M
      @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $4.01M
      @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      CRM
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(62/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😐Neutral(49/100)

      "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      CRM
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
      INTC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
      View CRM Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

      Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs INTC

      Is Salesforce, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

      Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a -59.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $158 vs. price $251), compared to INTC's -1509.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $6 vs. $101).

      Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

      CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

      Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

      INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

      Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

      Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 8.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

      Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

      CRM earns 9.2% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.