Compare StocksCRM vs IEX

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs IDEX Corporation (IEX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CRM is overvalued at $243, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -54%. IEX is overvalued at $223, with an intrinsic value of $180 and a margin of safety of -24%. Of the two, IEX has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$242.90
VS
IEX
IDEX Corporation
$222.64

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
IEX
  • IDEX Corporation scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with margin stability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.68 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
IEX
Valuation
$17.73B
Free Cash Flow
$555.61M
8.87%
FCF Yield
3.39%
22.24
Trailing P/E
31.99
15.19
Forward P/E
23.13
Quality & Moat
9.19%
ROIC
10.66%
19.38%
ROE
12.96%
77.28%
Gross Margin
44.73%
0.84
PEG Ratio
1.68
Balance Sheet Safety
0.81
Net Debt / Equity
0.32
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.31
0.70%
Dividend Yield
1.32%
CRM: 7Ties: 1IEX: 4
CRMIEX

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

IEX

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-2.22
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-32.49B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
IEX
$-4.09
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$975.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-3.99B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
54.2% Overvalued
Price is 54.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $242.90
Fair Value: $157.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
IEX
23.7% Overvalued
Price is 23.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $222.64
Fair Value: $179.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $243?

+9.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +1.8%

The market implies +9.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

IEX

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $223?

+12.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.0%

The market implies +12.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
IEX
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Margin Stability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
IEX
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 9.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,512
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
IEX
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 105.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,015
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
IEX
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $101,647
CHRISTENSON CARL R
Director
$101,647
@ $169.41 · 2025-11-05
HELMKAMP KATRINA L.
Director
$399,026
@ $159.61 · 2025-08-07
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
1
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.38M
CONWAY CRAIG
Director
$1.17M
@ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
IEX
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $3.40M
ANDERSON LISA M
General Counsel
$91,859
@ $238.59 · 2026-08-12
ASHLEMAN ERIC D
Chief Executive Officer
$3.31M
@ $215.22 · 2026-05-11
MAHENDRA AKHIL
Chief Financial Officer
$45,222
@ $180.89 · 2025-06-05
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
IEX
FearGreed
😐Neutral(56/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
IEX
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (56)
View CRM Full AnalysisView IEX Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs IEX

Is Salesforce, Inc. or IDEX Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, IEX trades at a -23.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $180 vs. price $223), compared to CRM's -54.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $243).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or IDEX Corporation?

IEX scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or IDEX Corporation?

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 8.9% free cash flow yield, compared to IDEX Corporation's 3.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or IDEX Corporation?

IEX earns 10.7% ROIC versus CRM's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or IDEX Corporation's?

IEX's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). IEX has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CRM vs IEX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io