Compare StocksCRM vs GIS

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs General Mills, Inc. (GIS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CRM is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. GIS is undervalued at $36, with an intrinsic value of $40891580894 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02
VS
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
$35.75

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
GIS
  • General Mills, Inc. scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of -0.1x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GIS
  • PEG ratio of 11.74 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.79 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 8.0% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
GIS
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$2.31B
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
21.32
Trailing P/E
N/A
11.86
Forward P/E
11.13
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
N/A
16.91%
ROE
-1.03%
77.64%
Gross Margin
33.73%
0.76
PEG Ratio
11.74
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
No debt
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.12
0.96%
Dividend Yield
6.83%
CRM: 4GIS: 3
CRMGIS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GIS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GIS
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$686.8M
Δ Market Cap
$-29.39
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GIS
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $35.75
Fair Value: $40891580894.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

GIS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $36?

-30.0%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market below historical growth — potential opportunity.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GIS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GIS
-2.55
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GIS
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.5%
No. of Institutional Holders1,774
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GIS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GIS
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $348,059
FERNANDEZ RICARDO
Officer
$275,828
@ $34.50 · 2026-05-12
GALLAGHER PAUL JOSEPH
Officer
$72,231
@ $48.15 · 2025-12-19
SHARMA PANKAJ MN
Officer
$197,159
@ $54.12 · 2025-05-15
HARMENING JEFFREY L
Chief Executive Officer
$739,635
@ $65.00 · 2025-03-07
GALLAGHER PAUL JOSEPH
Officer
$67,144
@ $64.50 · 2024-12-20
SASTRE MARIA AMALIA
Director
$63,660
@ $63.66 · 2024-11-15
HARMENING JEFFREY L
Chief Executive Officer
$3.19M
@ $68.61 · 2024-10-23
PALLOT MARK A
Officer
$576,149
@ $71.28 · 2024-10-15
NUDI JONATHON J
Officer
$717,650
@ $74.39 · 2024-09-27
SHARMA PANKAJ MN
Officer
$173,516
@ $74.63 · 2024-09-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GIS
FearGreed
😨Fear(30/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
GIS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (30)
View CRM Full AnalysisView GIS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs GIS

Is Salesforce, Inc. or General Mills, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to GIS's 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $40891580894 vs. $36).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or General Mills, Inc.?

GIS scores 80/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GIS scores 1.8 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or General Mills, Inc.'s?

CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to GIS's 35/100 (Unsafe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

CRM vs GIS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io