Compare Stocks › CRM vs EME

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CRM is overvalued at $229, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -45%. EME is undervalued at $680, with an intrinsic value of $930 and a margin of safety of 27%. Of the two, EME has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$229.17
VS
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$679.55

Rewards

CRM
  • ★Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
EME
  • ★EMCOR Group, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★EMCOR Group, Inc. scores 86/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 38.4% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

CRM
    EME
    • ⚠Gross margin of 19.6% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    EME
    Valuation
    $17.73B
    Free Cash Flow
    $1.29B
    9.40%
    FCF Yield
    4.32%
    20.97
    Trailing P/E
    19.65
    14.31
    Forward P/E
    17.21
    Quality & Moat
    9.19%
    ROIC
    33.86%
    19.38%
    ROE
    40.55%
    77.28%
    Gross Margin
    19.59%
    0.82
    PEG Ratio
    1.45
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.81
    Net Debt / Equity
    Net cash
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.10
    0.77%
    Dividend Yield
    0.24%
    CRM: 6Ties: 1EME: 5
    CRMEME

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    EME

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-3.08
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-45.24B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    EME
    $7.23
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.79B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$20.18B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    45.4% Overvalued
    Price is 45.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $229.17
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    EME
    27.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 27.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $679.55
    Fair Value: $930.50
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

    +8.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.1%

    The market implies +8.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    EME

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $680?

    +9.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +9.6%

    The market implies +9.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +9.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    EME
    86/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    EME
    -2.30
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 9.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,582
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    EME
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 97.3%Retail & Other 2.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,709
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.52M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $999,451
    @ $239.33 · 2026-09-18
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    EME
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2,300
    MCEVOY MICHAEL KEVIN
    Director
    $2,300
    @ $766.67 · 2026-09-01
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.71M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    EME
    0
    Sells (3M)
    9
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.82M
    LOWE CAROL P
    Director
    $802,275
    @ $844.50 · 2026-06-17
    REID WILLIAM P
    Director
    $1.85M
    @ $925.78 · 2026-05-11
    ALTMEYER JOHN W
    Director
    $2.24M
    @ $895.00 · 2026-05-01
    SCHWARZWAELDER STEVEN
    Director
    $5.01M
    @ $895.19 · 2026-04-30
    NALBANDIAN JASON R.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $685,144
    @ $856.43 · 2026-04-30
    LIND ROBERT PETER
    Officer
    $603,632
    @ $894.27 · 2026-04-30
    GUZZI ANTHONY J
    President
    $26.26M
    @ $729.48 · 2026-03-05
    MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
    General Counsel
    $2.47M
    @ $735.00 · 2026-03-02
    WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
    Director
    $897,316
    @ $677.22 · 2025-11-03
    NALBANDIAN JASON R.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $364,155
    @ $485.54 · 2025-06-06
    LIND ROBERT PETER
    Officer
    $216,960
    @ $485.37 · 2025-06-06
    GUZZI ANTHONY J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $3.05M
    @ $436.03 · 2025-05-05
    WALKER-LEE ROBIN A
    Director
    $390,950
    @ $412.83 · 2025-05-01
    MAURICIO MAXINE LUM
    General Counsel
    $462,588
    @ $370.07 · 2025-03-13
    ALTMEYER JOHN W
    Director
    $809,900
    @ $404.95 · 2025-02-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    EME
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(36/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    EME
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView EME Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs EME

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or EMCOR Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, EME trades at a 27.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $930 vs. price $680), compared to CRM's -45.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $229).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or EMCOR Group, Inc.?▼

    EME scores 86/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or EMCOR Group, Inc.?▼

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 9.4% free cash flow yield, compared to EMCOR Group, Inc.'s 4.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or EMCOR Group, Inc.?▼

    EME earns 33.9% ROIC versus CRM's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or EMCOR Group, Inc.'s?▼

    EME's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). EME has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

    CRM vs EME: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io