Compare StocksCRM vs EIX

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Edison International (EIX)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99
VS
EIX
Edison International
$71.89

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
EIX
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 2 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
  • Trailing P/E of 6.2x is 73% below the historical average of 22.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.01 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.

Risks

CRM
    EIX
    • Edison International scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — share issuance is offsetting repurchases.
    • High leverage (2.16x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    EIX
    Valuation
    $16.37B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-649.50M
    8.96%
    FCF Yield
    -2.35%
    25.00
    Trailing P/E
    6.22
    13.08
    Forward P/E
    11.03
    Quality & Moat
    8.21%
    ROIC
    9.02%
    12.61%
    ROE
    23.15%
    77.68%
    Gross Margin
    57.83%
    1.40
    PEG Ratio
    0.01
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.30
    Debt / Equity
    2.16
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.65
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.02
    0.90%
    Dividend Yield
    4.88%
    CRM: 5Ties: 1EIX: 6
    CRMEIX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    EIX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-5.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-76.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    EIX
    $-0.32
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $3.77B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.22B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    13.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $194.99
    Fair Value: $224.03
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    EIX
    48.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 48.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $71.89
    Fair Value: $139.58
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.3%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    EIX

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    EIX
    27/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    EIX
    -2.70
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,962
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    EIX
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 93.0%Retail & Other 6.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,370
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.38M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    EIX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.55M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $571,202
    @ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $557,034
    @ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    EIX
    3
    Sells (3M)
    5
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $1.39M
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $37,270
    @ $74.54 · 2026-03-02
    ANDERSON JILL CHARLOTTE
    Officer
    $514,088
    @ $74.67 · 2026-03-02
    BOWMAN ERICA S
    Officer
    $94,264
    @ $73.87 · 2026-02-23
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $99,486
    @ $55.27 · 2025-10-30
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $647,560
    @ $54.42 · 2025-08-04
    BELIVEAU-DUNN JEANNE
    Director
    $178,666
    @ $54.34 · 2025-03-06
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $104,100
    @ $83.28 · 2024-11-15
    UMANOFF ADAM S
    General Counsel
    $2.13M
    @ $83.05 · 2024-10-31
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $2.04M
    @ $85.45 · 2024-08-26
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $115,770
    @ $85.00 · 2024-08-23
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $2.60M
    @ $80.12 · 2024-07-31
    SCHILLING NATALIE K
    Officer
    $187,285
    @ $80.00 · 2024-07-31
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $2.27M
    @ $78.43 · 2024-07-26
    CHOI CAROLINE
    Officer
    $757,996
    @ $75.77 · 2024-06-05
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $4.12M
    @ $75.13 · 2024-05-14
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $4.36M
    @ $75.01 · 2024-05-10
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    EIX
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    EIX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView EIX Full Analysis