Compare StocksCRM vs EIX

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Edison International (EIX): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CRM is overvalued at $251, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -59%. EIX is undervalued at $55, with an intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of 57%. Of the two, EIX has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$250.54
VS
EIX
Edison International
$54.81

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
EIX
  • Gross margin of 61.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $11.43 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 3 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

CRM
    EIX
    • Edison International scores only 27/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Despite buyback spending, shares outstanding increased in 3 out of 3 years — share issuance is offsetting repurchases.
    • FCF yield of 0.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    EIX
    Valuation
    $17.73B
    Free Cash Flow
    $82.38M
    8.60%
    FCF Yield
    0.39%
    22.94
    Trailing P/E
    5.66
    15.64
    Forward P/E
    8.43
    Quality & Moat
    9.19%
    ROIC
    6.59%
    19.38%
    ROE
    19.73%
    77.28%
    Gross Margin
    61.00%
    0.87
    PEG Ratio
    2.49
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.81
    Net Debt / Equity
    2.27
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    4.85
    0.70%
    Dividend Yield
    6.40%
    CRM: 7Ties: 2EIX: 3
    CRMEIX

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    EIX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-1.73
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-25.39B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    EIX
    $-0.32
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $3.77B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-1.22B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    59.0% Overvalued
    Price is 59.0% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $250.54
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    EIX
    57.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 57.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $54.81
    Fair Value: $127.63
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $251?

    +9.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +2.2%

    The market implies +9.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    EIX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $55?

    +2.5%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +60.0%

    The market implies +2.5% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +60.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    EIX
    27/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    EIX
    -2.70
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 9.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,512
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    EIX
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 96.0%Retail & Other 3.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,504
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.52M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    EIX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.38M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    EIX
    1
    Sells (3M)
    6
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $820,458
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $37,700
    @ $75.40 · 2026-07-13
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $37,650
    @ $75.30 · 2026-04-13
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $37,270
    @ $74.54 · 2026-03-02
    ANDERSON JILL CHARLOTTE
    Officer
    $514,088
    @ $74.67 · 2026-03-02
    BOWMAN ERICA S
    Officer
    $94,264
    @ $73.87 · 2026-02-23
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $99,486
    @ $55.27 · 2025-10-30
    MURPHY J ANDREW
    Officer
    $647,560
    @ $54.42 · 2025-08-04
    BELIVEAU-DUNN JEANNE
    Director
    $178,666
    @ $54.34 · 2025-03-06
    TAYLOR PETER J
    Director
    $104,100
    @ $83.28 · 2024-11-15
    UMANOFF ADAM S
    General Counsel
    $2.13M
    @ $83.05 · 2024-10-31
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    EIX
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(26/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    EIX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView EIX Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs EIX

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or Edison International more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, EIX trades at a 57.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $128 vs. price $55), compared to CRM's -59.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $251).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Edison International?

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while EIX scores 27/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Edison International in financial distress?

    EIX's Altman Z-Score of 0.7 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Edison International?

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 8.6% free cash flow yield, compared to Edison International's 0.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Edison International?

    CRM earns 9.2% ROIC versus EIX's 6.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Edison International's?

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to EIX's 79/100 (Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.