Compare StocksCRM vs EA

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Electronic Arts Inc. (EA): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CRM is undervalued at $184, with a DCF intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. EA is overvalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $92 and a margin of safety of -127%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02
VS
EA
Electronic Arts Inc.
$209.86

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
EA
  • Gross margin of 79.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Electronic Arts Inc. scores 90/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
EA
  • Trailing P/E of 60.0x is 30% above the historical average of 46.3x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $3.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
  • Market sentiment is in extreme greed territory (score: 77/100) — elevated optimism may warrant caution.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CRM
EA
Valuation
$16.55B
Free Cash Flow
$2.22B
N/A
FCF Yield
4.19%
21.32
Trailing P/E
59.96
11.86
Forward P/E
21.79
Quality & Moat
9.61%
ROIC
16.57%
16.91%
ROE
13.49%
77.64%
Gross Margin
78.97%
0.76
PEG Ratio
1.30
Balance Sheet Safety
0.90
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.38
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.76
0.96%
Dividend Yield
0.36%
CRM: 6Ties: 2EA: 3
CRMEA

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

EA

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
EA
$5.68
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.69B
Δ Market Cap
+$15.26B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
EA
126.9% Overvalued
Price is 126.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $209.86
Fair Value: $92.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

EA

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $210?

+21.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +21.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
EA
90/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
EA
-3.08
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
EA
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 93.2%Retail & Other 6.6%
No. of Institutional Holders1,429
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
EA
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
EA
6
Sells (3M)
23
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.91M
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$517,517
@ $207.01 · 2026-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$507,762
@ $203.10 · 2026-06-15
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$602,496
@ $200.83 · 2026-05-28
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$1.01M
@ $201.19 · 2026-05-20
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,040
@ $201.36 · 2026-05-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$501,344
@ $200.54 · 2026-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$508,026
@ $203.21 · 2026-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$499,884
@ $199.95 · 2026-03-16
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$299,842
@ $199.89 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$498,825
@ $199.53 · 2026-02-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,667
@ $204.27 · 2026-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$510,284
@ $204.11 · 2025-12-15
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$302,475
@ $201.65 · 2025-11-20
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$502,643
@ $201.06 · 2025-11-17
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$802,049
@ $200.51 · 2025-11-07
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$240,961
@ $200.80 · 2025-10-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$504,477
@ $201.79 · 2025-10-01
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$1.98M
@ $197.94 · 2025-09-29
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$205,824
@ $171.52 · 2025-09-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$429,234
@ $171.69 · 2025-09-02
UBINAS LUIS A.
Director
$297,707
@ $170.51 · 2025-08-21
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$171,059
@ $171.06 · 2025-08-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$209,580
@ $174.65 · 2025-08-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,733
@ $155.49 · 2025-08-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$222,486
@ $148.32 · 2025-07-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$398,744
@ $159.50 · 2025-07-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$223,035
@ $148.69 · 2025-06-16
MIELE LAURA KAREN
President
$363,803
@ $145.52 · 2025-06-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$151,320
@ $151.32 · 2025-05-20
KELLY ERIC CHARLES
Officer
$302,090
@ $151.04 · 2025-05-16
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$224,462
@ $149.64 · 2025-05-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$388,929
@ $155.57 · 2025-05-08
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$218,468
@ $145.65 · 2025-04-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$362,764
@ $145.11 · 2025-04-01
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$208,470
@ $138.98 · 2025-03-17
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$325,837
@ $130.33 · 2025-03-03
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$130,108
@ $130.11 · 2025-02-20
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$192,900
@ $128.60 · 2025-02-18
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$327,078
@ $130.83 · 2025-02-06
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$215,175
@ $143.45 · 2025-01-15
MIELE LAURA KAREN
Officer
$365,371
@ $146.15 · 2025-01-02
CANFIELD STUART
Chief Financial Officer
$148,180
@ $148.18 · 2024-12-26
SCHATZ JACOB J
Officer
$234,409
@ $156.27 · 2024-12-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
EA
FearGreed
😏Greed(77/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
EA
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (77)
View CRM Full AnalysisView EA Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs EA

Is Salesforce, Inc. or Electronic Arts Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to EA's -126.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $92 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Electronic Arts Inc.?

EA scores 90/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. EA scores 6.5 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Electronic Arts Inc.?

EA earns 16.6% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Electronic Arts Inc.'s?

CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to EA's 85/100 (Very Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.