Compare StocksCRM vs DVN

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Devon Energy Corporation (DVN): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CRM is overvalued at $242, with a DCF intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -54%. DVN is overvalued at $48, with an intrinsic value of $28 and a margin of safety of -75%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$242.47
VS
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
$48.15

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
DVN
  • Devon Energy Corporation has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.

Risks

CRM
    DVN
    • FCF yield of 5.3% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • Trailing P/E of 10.5x is 38% above the historical average of 7.6x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • PEG ratio of 2.92 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    DVN
    Valuation
    $17.73B
    Free Cash Flow
    $2.80B
    8.89%
    FCF Yield
    5.28%
    22.20
    Trailing P/E
    10.47
    15.13
    Forward P/E
    8.98
    Quality & Moat
    9.19%
    ROIC
    11.36%
    19.38%
    ROE
    11.52%
    77.28%
    Gross Margin
    50.35%
    0.87
    PEG Ratio
    2.92
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.81
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.26
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.40
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.23
    0.70%
    Dividend Yield
    2.64%
    CRM: 5Ties: 1DVN: 6
    CRMDVN

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    DVN

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-2.24
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-32.89B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    DVN
    $-2.96
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $5.87B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-17.38B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    53.9% Overvalued
    Price is 53.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $242.47
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    DVN
    74.5% Overvalued
    Price is 74.5% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $48.15
    Fair Value: $27.59
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $242?

    +9.0%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.8%

    The market implies +9.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    DVN

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $48?

    +9.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    DVN
    42/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with roic consistency as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    DVN
    -3.01
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 9.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,512
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    DVN
    Insiders 0.8%Institutions 94.7%Retail & Other 4.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,883
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.52M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    DVN
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $199,876
    GASPAR CLAY M.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $199,876
    @ $51.08 · 2026-09-14
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.38M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    DVN
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $5.60M
    LOWE ROBERT FERRALL III
    Officer
    $344,218
    @ $50.95 · 2026-09-14
    ALEXANDER ANDREA
    Officer
    $841,320
    @ $46.74 · 2026-06-10
    VELA ADAM M
    General Counsel
    $1.15M
    @ $47.21 · 2026-05-14
    RITENOUR JEFFREY L.
    Officer
    $3.27M
    @ $46.66 · 2026-05-11
    KINDICK KELT
    Director
    $257,140
    @ $33.46 · 2025-08-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(54/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    DVN
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(60/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (54)
    DVN
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView DVN Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRM vs DVN

    Is Salesforce, Inc. or Devon Energy Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a -53.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $158 vs. price $242), compared to DVN's -74.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $28 vs. $48).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Salesforce, Inc. or Devon Energy Corporation?

    CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat), while DVN scores 42/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Devon Energy Corporation in financial distress?

    DVN's Altman Z-Score of 2.3 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Salesforce, Inc. or Devon Energy Corporation?

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 8.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Devon Energy Corporation's 5.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Salesforce, Inc. or Devon Energy Corporation?

    DVN earns 11.4% ROIC versus CRM's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Salesforce, Inc.'s or Devon Energy Corporation's?

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to DVN's 85/100 (Very Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    CRM vs DVN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io