Compare StocksCRM vs DUK

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Duke Energy Corporation (DUK)

CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99
VS
DUK
Duke Energy Corporation
$129.74

Rewards

CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.
DUK
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $4.60 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRM
    DUK
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.6x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    • Altman Z-Score of 0.67 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • 6 insider sales totaling $5.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRM
    DUK
    Valuation
    $16.37B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-2.00B
    8.96%
    FCF Yield
    -1.98%
    25.00
    Trailing P/E
    20.56
    13.08
    Forward P/E
    18.13
    Quality & Moat
    8.21%
    ROIC
    4.89%
    12.61%
    ROE
    9.26%
    77.68%
    Gross Margin
    51.90%
    1.40
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.30
    Debt / Equity
    1.72
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.65
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    5.58
    0.90%
    Dividend Yield
    3.28%
    CRM: 8Ties: 1DUK: 2
    CRMDUK

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    DUK

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRM
    $-5.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-76.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    DUK
    $4.60
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $2.58B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$11.85B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRM
    13.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $194.99
    Fair Value: $224.03
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    DUK
    913.9% Overvalued
    Price is 913.9% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $129.74
    Fair Value: $12.80
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.3%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    DUK

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    DUK
    47/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving reinvestment efficiency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    DUK
    -2.76
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,962
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    DUK
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 70.3%Retail & Other 29.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,882
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.38M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    DUK
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.55M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $571,202
    @ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $557,034
    @ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    DUK
    6
    Sells (3M)
    13
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.21M
    GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
    Officer
    $2.40M
    @ $131.57 · 2026-03-02
    REPKO REGIS T
    Officer
    $86,853
    @ $131.00 · 2026-03-02
    REPKO REGIS T
    Officer
    $123,001
    @ $127.86 · 2026-02-24
    SAVOY BRIAN D.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.53M
    @ $127.69 · 2026-02-23
    REPKO REGIS T
    Officer
    $556,540
    @ $127.18 · 2026-02-20
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $868,156
    @ $127.67 · 2026-02-12
    GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $1.02M
    @ $123.80 · 2025-11-19
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $100,520
    @ $125.65 · 2025-11-18
    TITONE BONNIE B.
    Officer
    $248,764
    @ $124.38 · 2025-08-20
    WEINTRAUB ALEXANDER J
    Officer
    $48,656
    @ $121.64 · 2025-08-19
    GILLESPIE THOMAS PRESTON JR.
    Officer
    $832,542
    @ $124.26 · 2025-08-12
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $198,378
    @ $125.56 · 2025-08-07
    MCKEE E MARIE
    Director
    $201,057
    @ $124.88 · 2025-08-07
    GHARTEY-TAGOE KODWO
    Officer
    $1.05M
    @ $117.10 · 2025-02-28
    JANSON JULIA S.
    Officer
    $1.16M
    @ $116.09 · 2025-02-26
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $542,969
    @ $111.49 · 2025-02-18
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $44,592
    @ $111.48 · 2024-11-15
    GLENN ROBERT ALEXANDER
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $109.74 · 2024-11-15
    JANSON JULIA S.
    Officer
    $1.13M
    @ $112.58 · 2024-08-23
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $61,366
    @ $113.64 · 2024-08-08
    GOOD LYNN J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.55M
    @ $103.30 · 2024-05-15
    MCKEE E MARIE
    Director
    $173,415
    @ $102.31 · 2024-05-14
    RENJEL LOUIS E
    Officer
    $123,432
    @ $102.86 · 2024-05-09
    JANSON JULIA S.
    Officer
    $1.03M
    @ $102.79 · 2024-05-09
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    DUK
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(63/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    DUK
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (63)
    View CRM Full AnalysisView DUK Full Analysis
    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) vs Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io