Compare StocksCRL vs INTC

Charles River Laboratories Inte (CRL) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CRL is overvalued at $233, with a DCF intrinsic value of $0 and a margin of safety of -100%. INTC is overvalued at $90, with an intrinsic value of $7 and a margin of safety of -1271%. Of the two, CRL has the wider margin of safety.

CRL
Charles River Laboratories Inte
$232.51
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$90.20

Rewards

CRL
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 20.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • PEG ratio of 0.12 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTC

    Risks

    CRL
    • Altman Z-Score of 1.08 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
    • Insiders have sold $16.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 1.1% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRL
    INTC
    Valuation
    $510.02M
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.87B
    N/A
    FCF Yield
    1.07%
    N/A
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    18.86
    Forward P/E
    44.27
    Quality & Moat
    8.37%
    ROIC
    3.57%
    -5.87%
    ROE
    -10.71%
    34.46%
    Gross Margin
    38.87%
    0.12
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.96
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    3.23
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.24
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    CRL: 4Ties: 1INTC: 5
    CRLINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRL
    $-0.00
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $340.6M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-18.42
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRL
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $232.51
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $90.20
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $233?

    +25.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -10.3%

    The market implies +25.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -10.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $90?

    +29.6%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRL
    38/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRL
    -2.97
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRL
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 123.7%
    No. of Institutional Holders790
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.7%Institutions 63.9%Retail & Other 21.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,881
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4,364
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $4,364
    @ $174.56 · 2026-03-03
    FOSTER JAMES C
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.00M
    @ $165.01 · 2025-02-20
    GIRSHICK BIRGIT
    Chief Operating Officer
    $249,250
    @ $164.63 · 2025-02-20
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRL
    1
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $17.13M
    FOSTER JAMES C
    Director
    $16.88M
    @ $225.00 · 2026-06-29
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $65,488
    @ $163.72 · 2025-08-22
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $126,080
    @ $157.60 · 2025-08-18
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $60,016
    @ $150.04 · 2025-08-07
    MASSARO GEORGE E
    Director
    $19,260
    @ $137.57 · 2025-05-15
    MASSARO GEORGE E
    Director
    $19,703
    @ $140.74 · 2025-05-14
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $72,705
    @ $145.41 · 2025-05-13
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $715,000
    @ $162.50 · 2025-02-20
    LAPLUME JOSEPH W
    Officer
    $354,861
    @ $199.36 · 2024-08-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRL
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(57/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    View CRL Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRL vs INTC

    Is Charles River Laboratories Inte or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRL trades at a -100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $0 vs. price $233), compared to INTC's -1270.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $7 vs. $90).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Charles River Laboratories Inte or Intel Corporation?

    CRL scores 38/100 (None moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Charles River Laboratories Inte in financial distress?

    CRL's Altman Z-Score of 1.1 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. INTC scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Charles River Laboratories Inte or Intel Corporation?

    CRL earns 8.4% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    CRL vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io