Compare Stocks › CRH vs CRM

CRH plc (CRH) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CRH is undervalued at $91, with a DCF intrinsic value of $152 and a margin of safety of 40%. CRM is overvalued at $229, with an intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -45%. Of the two, CRH has the wider margin of safety.

CRH
CRH plc
$90.81
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$229.17

Rewards

CRH
  • ★CRH plc scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 10% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
CRM
  • ★Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CRH
  • ⚠Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
CRM

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CRH
    CRM
    Valuation
    $2.28B
    Free Cash Flow
    $17.73B
    3.77%
    FCF Yield
    9.40%
    17.10
    Trailing P/E
    20.97
    14.93
    Forward P/E
    14.31
    Quality & Moat
    11.66%
    ROIC
    9.19%
    13.91%
    ROE
    19.38%
    36.23%
    Gross Margin
    77.28%
    1.74
    PEG Ratio
    0.82
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.62
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.81
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.12
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.40
    1.72%
    Dividend Yield
    0.77%
    CRH: 5Ties: 2CRM: 5
    CRHCRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CRH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CRH
    $8.03
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $6.70B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$53.81B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CRM
    $-3.08
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-45.24B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CRH
    42.8% Margin of Safety
    Price is 42.8% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $90.81
    Fair Value: $158.63
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CRM
    45.4% Overvalued
    Price is 45.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $229.17
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CRH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $91?

    +8.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +14.8%

    The market implies +8.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +14.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $229?

    +8.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.1%

    The market implies +8.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CRH
    74/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CRH
    -2.55
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CRH
    Insiders 0.1%Institutions 88.0%Retail & Other 11.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,606
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.2%Retail & Other 9.8%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,582
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CRH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $601,285
    TALBOT SIOBHAN
    Director
    $204,223
    @ $102.11 · 2026-03-12
    FEARON RICHARD H
    Director
    $397,062
    @ $104.49 · 2026-03-11
    O'RIORDAIN PADRAIG
    Officer
    $147,941
    @ $99.16 · 2025-05-13
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CRM
    1
    Buys (3M)
    5
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $27.52M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $999,451
    @ $239.33 · 2026-09-18
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CRH
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $155,832
    O'RIORDAIN PADRAIG
    Officer
    $155,832
    @ $104.45 · 2026-05-15
    LAKE RANDY
    Chief Operating Officer
    $4.44M
    @ $110.91 · 2025-08-12
    MINTERN DENIS JAMES
    Chief Executive Officer
    $421,693
    @ $102.93 · 2025-03-03
    CONNOLLY ALAN
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $102.93 · 2025-03-03
    MANIFOLD ALBERT JUDE
    Former
    $705,711
    @ $100.82 · 2025-02-28
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $33.71M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CRH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CRH
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    CRM
    ⚪Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View CRH Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CRH vs CRM

    Is CRH plc or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRH trades at a 40.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $152 vs. price $91), compared to CRM's -45.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $229).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, CRH plc or Salesforce, Inc.?▼

    CRH scores 74/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, CRH plc or Salesforce, Inc.?▼

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 9.4% free cash flow yield, compared to CRH plc's 3.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, CRH plc or Salesforce, Inc.?▼

    CRH earns 11.7% ROIC versus CRM's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, CRH plc's or Salesforce, Inc.'s?▼

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRH's 85/100 (Very Safe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

    CRH vs CRM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io