Compare StocksCPT vs V

Camden Property Trust (CPT) vs Visa Inc. (V)

CPT
Camden Property Trust
$99.68
VS
V
Visa Inc.
$299.71

Rewards

CPT
  • Gross margin of 61.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 28.2x is 27% below the historical average of 38.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 0.10 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
V
  • Visa Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 97.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Visa Inc. scores 99/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CPT
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.3x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.60 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
V
  • Insiders have sold $3.9M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CPT
V
Valuation
$767.72M
Free Cash Flow
$22.03B
7.24%
FCF Yield
3.81%
28.16
Trailing P/E
28.17
57.11
Forward P/E
20.62
Quality & Moat
2.97%
ROIC
37.25%
8.66%
ROE
51.73%
61.73%
Gross Margin
97.78%
0.10
PEG Ratio
1.62
Balance Sheet Safety
0.88
Debt / Equity
0.55
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.33
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.16
4.25%
Dividend Yield
0.89%
CPT: 3Ties: 2V: 7
CPTV

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CPT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

V

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CPT
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-395.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-206.6M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
V
$5.50
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$44.47B
Δ Market Cap
+$244.54B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CPT
55.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 55.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $99.68
Fair Value: $226.08
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
V
1.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 1.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $299.71
Fair Value: $303.16
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CPT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $100?

+16.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +6.9%

The market implies +16.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +6.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

V

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $300?

+12.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.5%

The market implies +12.8% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +11.5%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CPT
56/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
V
99/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CPT
-2.77
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
V
-2.50
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CPT
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 105.9%
No. of Institutional Holders839
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
V
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 90.8%Retail & Other 8.7%
No. of Institutional Holders5,907
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CPT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
V
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CPT
9
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.89M
GALLAGHER MICHAEL P
Officer
$18,325
@ $108.43 · 2026-02-18
BAKER LAURIE A.
Chief Operating Officer
$235,007
@ $108.40 · 2026-02-18
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$4.79M
@ $109.83 · 2026-01-06
BAKER LAURIE A.
Chief Operating Officer
$74,827
@ $109.88 · 2026-01-06
WESTBROOK KELVIN R
Director
$244,065
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
BENITO JAVIER
Director
$11,079
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
JESSETT ALEXANDER J
President
$617,237
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
BRUNNER HEATHER J
Director
$230,792
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN
Director
$16,814
@ $109.18 · 2026-01-02
WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN
Director
$142,512
@ $118.76 · 2025-05-16
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.51M
@ $119.52 · 2025-05-07
GALLAGHER MICHAEL P
Officer
$16,495
@ $122.19 · 2025-03-10
BAKER LAURIE A.
Chief Operating Officer
$273,221
@ $118.38 · 2025-02-19
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$5.36M
@ $119.07 · 2025-02-11
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$953,426
@ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
JESSETT ALEXANDER J
President
$1.70M
@ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
BRUNNER HEATHER J
Director
$241,233
@ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
V
2
Sells (3M)
24
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $101.23M
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$201,253
@ $309.62 · 2026-03-11
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.66M
@ $349.18 · 2026-01-02
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.57M
@ $340.07 · 2025-12-11
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$699,315
@ $345.00 · 2025-12-11
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$7.84M
@ $330.14 · 2025-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$2.50M
@ $331.45 · 2025-12-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$2.08M
@ $330.00 · 2025-11-21
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$707,917
@ $325.93 · 2025-11-21
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$302,832
@ $336.48 · 2025-11-04
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.58M
@ $341.00 · 2025-11-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.59M
@ $342.30 · 2025-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.65M
@ $348.57 · 2025-09-02
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$697,329
@ $344.02 · 2025-08-18
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.60M
@ $343.13 · 2025-08-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.05M
@ $353.82 · 2025-07-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$4.36M
@ $375.00 · 2025-06-11
TANEJA RAJAT
President
$18.44M
@ $368.87 · 2025-06-05
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$17.10M
@ $370.00 · 2025-06-05
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $362.77 · 2025-06-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$6.32M
@ $357.45 · 2025-05-12
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$5.26M
@ $355.04 · 2025-05-08
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.98M
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$889,868
@ $345.58 · 2025-05-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.02M
@ $350.44 · 2025-04-01
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$13.40M
@ $340.41 · 2025-03-19
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$12.88M
@ $327.20 · 2025-03-14
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$3.13M
@ $363.00 · 2025-03-03
ANDRESKI PETER M
Officer
$815,314
@ $349.62 · 2025-02-07
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$11.80M
@ $349.77 · 2025-02-07
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.93M
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$874,480
@ $340.00 · 2025-02-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.74M
@ $317.78 · 2025-01-02
TANEJA RAJAT
Officer
$11.15M
@ $315.55 · 2024-12-13
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.73M
@ $316.90 · 2024-12-02
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$668,603
@ $307.97 · 2024-11-22
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.49M
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$741,996
@ $288.49 · 2024-11-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.39M
@ $276.97 · 2024-10-01
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.38M
@ $276.37 · 2024-09-03
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.37M
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
ROTTENBERG JULIE B
General Counsel
$707,300
@ $275.00 · 2024-08-29
MAHON TULLIER KELLY
Officer
$10.12M
@ $267.64 · 2024-08-16
FABARA PAUL D
Officer
$7.01M
@ $277.15 · 2024-05-15
CARNEY LLOYD A
Director
$250,472
@ $275.55 · 2024-04-26
MCINERNEY RYAN
Chief Executive Officer
$2.30M
@ $280.36 · 2024-04-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CPT
FearGreed
😨Fear(35/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
V
FearGreed
😨Fear(36/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CPT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (35)
V
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
View CPT Full AnalysisView V Full Analysis