Compare StocksCPT vs INTC

Camden Property Trust (CPT) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

CPT
Camden Property Trust
$104.45
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

CPT
  • Gross margin of 61.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 29.2x is 24% below the historical average of 38.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
INTC

    Risks

    CPT
    • FCF yield of 6.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    • PEG ratio of 2.41 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.0x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CPT
    INTC
    Valuation
    $688.08M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    6.65%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    29.18
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    82.00
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    0.56%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    9.37%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    61.62%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    2.41
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.04
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    5.04
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    4.06%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    CPT: 4Ties: 1INTC: 5
    CPTINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CPT

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CPT
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-395.7M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-206.6M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CPT
    56.4% Margin of Safety
    Price is 56.4% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $104.45
    Fair Value: $239.35
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CPT

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $104?

    +16.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +8.5%

    The market implies +16.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +8.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CPT
    56/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CPT
    -2.77
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CPT
    Insiders 1.5%Institutions 109.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders822
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CPT
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CPT
    2
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $8.89M
    BAKER LAURIE A.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $235,007
    @ $108.40 · 2026-02-18
    GALLAGHER MICHAEL P
    Officer
    $18,325
    @ $108.43 · 2026-02-18
    BAKER LAURIE A.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $74,827
    @ $109.88 · 2026-01-06
    CAMPO RICHARD J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $4.79M
    @ $109.83 · 2026-01-06
    JESSETT ALEXANDER J
    President
    $617,237
    @ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
    BRUNNER HEATHER J
    Director
    $230,792
    @ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
    WESTBROOK KELVIN R
    Director
    $244,065
    @ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
    BENITO JAVIER
    Director
    $11,079
    @ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
    WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN
    Director
    $16,814
    @ $109.18 · 2026-01-02
    WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN
    Director
    $142,512
    @ $118.76 · 2025-05-16
    CAMPO RICHARD J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.51M
    @ $119.52 · 2025-05-07
    GALLAGHER MICHAEL P
    Officer
    $16,495
    @ $122.19 · 2025-03-10
    BAKER LAURIE A.
    Chief Operating Officer
    $273,221
    @ $118.38 · 2025-02-19
    CAMPO RICHARD J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.36M
    @ $119.07 · 2025-02-11
    JESSETT ALEXANDER J
    President
    $1.70M
    @ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
    BRUNNER HEATHER J
    Director
    $241,233
    @ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
    CAMPO RICHARD J
    Chief Executive Officer
    $953,426
    @ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CPT
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(50/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CPT
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View CPT Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
    CPT vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io