Compare StocksCPT vs GS

Camden Property Trust (CPT) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CPT is overvalued at $101, with a DCF intrinsic value of $32 and a margin of safety of -219%. GS is undervalued at $936, with an intrinsic value of $1956 and a margin of safety of 52%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

CPT
Camden Property Trust
$101.16
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$935.78

Rewards

CPT
  • Gross margin of 61.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
GS
  • Gross margin of 82.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CPT
  • PEG ratio of 9.17 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 5.4x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.60 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 16 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CPT
GS
Valuation
$386.22M
Free Cash Flow
N/A
3.30%
FCF Yield
N/A
33.39
Trailing P/E
14.46
92.81
Forward P/E
12.64
Quality & Moat
2.30%
ROIC
2.20%
7.89%
ROE
16.90%
61.62%
Gross Margin
82.08%
9.17
PEG Ratio
1.22
Balance Sheet Safety
1.24
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
5.40
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
4.19%
Dividend Yield
2.13%
CPT: 1Ties: 2GS: 6
CPTGS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CPT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CPT
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-395.7M
Δ Market Cap
$-206.6M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CPT
219.0% Overvalued
Price is 219.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $101.16
Fair Value: $31.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GS
52.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 52.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $935.78
Fair Value: $1956.24
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CPT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

+13.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.1%

The market implies +13.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CPT
56/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CPT
-2.77
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CPT
Insiders 1.5%Institutions 105.7%
No. of Institutional Holders823
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 23.6%
No. of Institutional Holders3,994
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CPT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CPT
0
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.61M
CAMPO RICHARD J
Officer and Director
$3.37M
@ $112.42 · 2026-06-05
BAKER LAURIE A.
Chief Operating Officer
$235,007
@ $108.40 · 2026-02-18
GALLAGHER MICHAEL P
Officer
$18,325
@ $108.43 · 2026-02-18
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$4.79M
@ $109.83 · 2026-01-06
BAKER LAURIE A.
Chief Operating Officer
$74,827
@ $109.88 · 2026-01-06
JESSETT ALEXANDER J
President
$617,237
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
BRUNNER HEATHER J
Director
$230,792
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
WESTBROOK KELVIN R
Director
$244,065
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
BENITO JAVIER
Director
$11,079
@ $109.69 · 2026-01-05
WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN
Director
$16,814
@ $109.18 · 2026-01-02
WEBSTER STEVEN ALAN
Director
$142,512
@ $118.76 · 2025-05-16
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.51M
@ $119.52 · 2025-05-07
GALLAGHER MICHAEL P
Officer
$16,495
@ $122.19 · 2025-03-10
BAKER LAURIE A.
Chief Operating Officer
$273,221
@ $118.38 · 2025-02-19
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$5.36M
@ $119.07 · 2025-02-11
CAMPO RICHARD J
Chief Executive Officer
$953,426
@ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
JESSETT ALEXANDER J
President
$1.70M
@ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
BRUNNER HEATHER J
Director
$241,233
@ $113.95 · 2025-01-08
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GS
3
Sells (3M)
16
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $65.54M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$620,280
@ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$184,445
@ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CPT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(43/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CPT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (43)
View CPT Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CPT vs GS

Is Camden Property Trust or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 52.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1956 vs. price $936), compared to CPT's -219.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $32 vs. $101).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Camden Property Trust or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?

GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat), while CPT scores 56/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CPT scores 1.6 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Camden Property Trust or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?

CPT earns 2.3% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Camden Property Trust's or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s?

GS's dividend earns a safety score of 79/100 (Safe), compared to CPT's 24/100 (Unsafe). GS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CPT vs GS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io