Compare StocksCPB vs PFE

The Campbell's Company (CPB) vs Pfizer Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CPB is undervalued at $21, with a DCF intrinsic value of $33 and a margin of safety of 35%. PFE is overvalued at $28, with an intrinsic value of $22 and a margin of safety of -23%. Of the two, CPB has the wider margin of safety.

CPB
The Campbell's Company
$21.41
VS
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
$27.66

Rewards

CPB
  • The Campbell's Company scores 78/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • FCF yield of 11.7% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
  • PEG ratio of 0.55 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Insiders have bought $3.0M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant skin in the game.

Risks

CPB
  • High leverage (1.62x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.2x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 9.1% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • FCF yield of 7.9% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 12.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CPB
PFE
Valuation
$747.37M
Free Cash Flow
$12.49B
11.71%
FCF Yield
7.92%
16.34
Trailing P/E
36.40
11.66
Forward P/E
9.55
Quality & Moat
7.05%
ROIC
9.42%
10.05%
ROE
5.01%
28.57%
Gross Margin
74.72%
0.55
PEG Ratio
12.68
Balance Sheet Safety
1.62
Net Debt / Equity
0.61
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.04
4.68%
Dividend Yield
6.26%
CPB: 4Ties: 1PFE: 7
CPBPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CPB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CPB
$-12.81
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$676.0M
Δ Market Cap
$-8.66B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-146.18B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CPB
34.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 34.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $21.41
Fair Value: $32.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
23.3% Overvalued
Price is 23.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $27.66
Fair Value: $22.43
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CPB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $21?

+6.0%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market above historical growth — verify catalysts.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $28?

+6.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.3%

The market implies +6.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +5.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CPB
78/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CPB
-2.70
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CPB
Insiders 37.5%Institutions 63.8%
No. of Institutional Holders817
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.1%Retail & Other 30.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,645
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CPB
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $6,435
DORRANCE BENNETT JR.
Director
$6,435
@ $21.45 · 2026-06-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
3
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.96M
BOURLA ALBERT
Chief Executive Officer
$1.00M
@ $26.34 · 2026-08-12
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$998,821
@ $25.46 · 2026-08-05
BUCKLEY MORTIMER J.
Director
$960,369
@ $25.52 · 2026-08-05
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CPB
0
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $396,653
SANZIO ANTHONY
Officer
$71,578
@ $26.51 · 2026-01-09
BRAWLEY CHARLES A. III
General Counsel
$325,075
@ $28.15 · 2025-12-30
BRAWLEY CHARLES A. III
General Counsel
$100,000
@ $40.03 · 2025-03-31
SANZIO ANTHONY
Officer
$83,805
@ $41.90 · 2025-01-03
SANZIO ANTHONY
Officer
$187,528
@ $46.88 · 2024-10-03
POLOMSKI STANLEY
Officer
$649,690
@ $48.34 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
2
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $134,661
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$83,261
@ $25.40 · 2026-08-05
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CPB
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CPB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View CPB Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CPB vs PFE

Is The Campbell's Company or Pfizer Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CPB trades at a 34.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $33 vs. price $21), compared to PFE's -23.3% margin of safety (intrinsic $22 vs. $28).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Campbell's Company or Pfizer Inc.?

CPB scores 78/100 (Wide moat), while PFE scores 35/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Campbell's Company in financial distress?

CPB's Altman Z-Score of 1.8 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PFE scores 2.1 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, The Campbell's Company or Pfizer Inc.?

The Campbell's Company (CPB) generates a 11.7% free cash flow yield, compared to Pfizer Inc.'s 7.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Campbell's Company or Pfizer Inc.?

PFE earns 9.4% ROIC versus CPB's 7.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

CPB vs PFE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io