Compare StocksCPAY vs GOOGL

Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CPAY is undervalued at $345, with a DCF intrinsic value of $487 and a margin of safety of 29%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, CPAY has the wider margin of safety.

CPAY
Corpay, Inc.
$345.28
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

CPAY
  • Gross margin of 79.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Corpay, Inc. scores 93/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 29.1% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CPAY
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has produced only $0.50 of earning power — shareholders may have been better served by dividends.
  • High leverage (2.05x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.50 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CPAY
GOOGL
Valuation
$2.10B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
9.28%
FCF Yield
1.63%
20.69
Trailing P/E
28.09
11.28
Forward P/E
25.39
Quality & Moat
10.91%
ROIC
20.98%
32.12%
ROE
38.88%
79.71%
Gross Margin
60.37%
0.87
PEG Ratio
1.47
Balance Sheet Safety
2.05
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
3.11
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
0.00%
Dividend Yield
0.24%
CPAY: 5Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
CPAYGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CPAY

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CPAY
$2.32
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.06B
Δ Market Cap
+$7.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CPAY
29.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 29.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $345.28
Fair Value: $487.07
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CPAY

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $345?

+10.3%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.4%

The market implies +10.3% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +3.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CPAY
93/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CPAY
-2.52
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CPAY
Insiders 3.9%Institutions 102.4%
No. of Institutional Holders1,012
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CPAY
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.52M
STULL STEVEN T
Director
$2.52M
@ $314.98 · 2025-12-12
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CPAY
2
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $9.58M
NETTO ARMANDO LINS
Officer
$1.60M
@ $351.60 · 2026-06-11
NETTO ARMANDO LINS
Officer
$6.13M
@ $356.18 · 2026-05-29
SLOAN JEFFREY STEVEN
Director
$1.24M
@ $343.62 · 2026-02-17
VICKERY ALISSA B
Officer
$610,067
@ $358.65 · 2026-02-10
MACCHIA RICHARD
Director
$910,683
@ $375.23 · 2025-02-10
KING ALAN
Officer
$8.13M
@ $381.97 · 2024-11-26
VICKERY ALISSA B
Officer
$2.96M
@ $370.04 · 2024-11-20
NETTO ARMANDO LINS
President
$25.50M
@ $363.42 · 2024-11-19
FARRELLY JOSEPH W.
Director
$1.12M
@ $375.18 · 2024-11-13
NETTO ARMANDO LINS
Officer
$19.70M
@ $307.33 · 2024-09-10
CLARKE RONALD F
Chief Executive Officer
$49.52M
@ $309.50 · 2024-09-03
FARRELLY JOSEPH W.
Director
$1.00M
@ $310.14 · 2024-08-29
VICKERY ALISSA B
Officer
$1.54M
@ $292.38 · 2024-08-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CPAY
FearGreed
😐Neutral(53/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CPAY
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View CPAY Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CPAY vs GOOGL

Is Corpay, Inc. or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CPAY trades at a 29.1% margin of safety (intrinsic value $487 vs. price $345), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Corpay, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

CPAY scores 93/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Corpay, Inc. in financial distress?

CPAY's Altman Z-Score of 1.5 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Corpay, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

Corpay, Inc. (CPAY) generates a 9.3% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Corpay, Inc. or Alphabet Inc.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus CPAY's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

CPAY vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io