Compare StocksCOO vs INTC

The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, COO is overvalued at $55, with a DCF intrinsic value of $21 and a margin of safety of -165%. INTC is overvalued at $101, with an intrinsic value of $6 and a margin of safety of -1509%. Of the two, COO has the wider margin of safety.

COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
$54.61
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$101.05

Rewards

COO
  • Gross margin of 65.9% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • 3 insider purchases totaling $1.3M with no sells in the past 3 months — insiders are putting their own money in.
  • Trailing P/E of 18.8x is 62% below the historical average of 49.1x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
INTC

    Risks

    COO
    • FCF yield of 5.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
    • Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
    • FCF yield of 0.9% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    COO
    INTC
    Valuation
    $542.65M
    Free Cash Flow
    $4.87B
    5.23%
    FCF Yield
    0.91%
    18.77
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    11.63
    Forward P/E
    49.00
    Quality & Moat
    6.26%
    ROIC
    3.57%
    6.84%
    ROE
    -10.71%
    65.93%
    Gross Margin
    38.87%
    0.51
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.32
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    2.84
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    1.24
    0.00%
    Dividend Yield
    0.00%
    COO: 6Ties: 1INTC: 4
    COOINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    COO

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    COO
    $-0.23
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $1.06B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-246.1M
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    COO
    164.7% Overvalued
    Price is 164.7% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $54.61
    Fair Value: $20.63
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $101.05
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    COO

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $55?

    +14.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +10.2%

    The market implies +14.7% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding +10.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    INTC

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $101?

    +31.8%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    COO
    61/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    COO
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.83
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    COO
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 111.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders988
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 14.0%Institutions 62.5%Retail & Other 23.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders4,436
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    COO
    3
    Buys (3M)
    9
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.77M
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $539,150
    @ $53.91 · 2026-09-14
    ROSEBROUGH WALTER M JR
    Director
    $541,640
    @ $54.16 · 2026-09-14
    KEEL PAUL A
    Director
    $250,000
    @ $53.18 · 2026-09-11
    LUCCHESE CYNTHIA L
    Director
    $149,963
    @ $84.06 · 2025-12-22
    RIVAS MARIA
    Director
    $82,130
    @ $82.13 · 2025-12-18
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $165,000
    @ $82.50 · 2025-12-17
    SHEFFIELD HOLLY R
    Officer
    $99,322
    @ $80.75 · 2025-12-16
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $808,000
    @ $80.80 · 2025-12-16
    KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
    Director
    $136,780
    @ $68.39 · 2025-09-29
    WARNER GERARD H, III
    Officer
    $100,384
    @ $69.23 · 2025-09-05
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $683,900
    @ $68.39 · 2025-09-05
    MCBRIDE DANIEL G
    Chief Operating Officer
    $195,120
    @ $65.04 · 2025-09-02
    ANDREWS BRIAN G
    Chief Financial Officer
    $100,162
    @ $65.68 · 2025-09-02
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $10.25M
    TAN LIP-BU
    Chief Executive Officer
    $10.00M
    @ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    COO
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    WHITE ALBERT G III
    Chief Executive Officer
    $12.71M
    @ $110.53 · 2024-09-19
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    3
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $7.47M
    CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.49M
    @ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $4.01M
    @ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    COO
    FearGreed
    🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

    "Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(49/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    COO
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
    View COO Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: COO vs INTC

    Is The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, COO trades at a -164.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $21 vs. price $55), compared to INTC's -1509.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $6 vs. $101).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    COO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?

    INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COO scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) generates a 5.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.9%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Intel Corporation?

    COO earns 6.3% ROIC versus INTC's 3.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    COO vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io