Compare StocksCOO vs INTC

The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
$62.36
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

COO
  • Gross margin of 65.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • 10 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • Trailing P/E of 31.0x is 37% below the historical average of 48.9x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
INTC

    Risks

    COO
      INTC
      • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

      Key Valuation Metrics

      Learn more →
      COO
      INTC
      Valuation
      $367.09M
      Free Cash Flow
      $-8.30B
      3.02%
      FCF Yield
      -1.66%
      31.02
      Trailing P/E
      N/A
      12.42
      Forward P/E
      66.78
      Quality & Moat
      6.12%
      ROIC
      1.72%
      4.48%
      ROE
      -0.21%
      65.44%
      Gross Margin
      37.20%
      1.15
      PEG Ratio
      1.36
      Balance Sheet Safety
      0.33
      Debt / Equity
      0.36
      N/A
      Interest Coverage
      N/A
      2.41
      Net Debt / EBITDA
      0.86
      N/A
      Dividend Yield
      N/A
      COO: 8Ties: 1INTC: 1
      COOINTC

      Historical Fundamentals

      Learn more →
      COO

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      INTC

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

      $1 Retained Earnings Test

      Learn more →
      COO
      $-0.23
      created per $1 retained over 3 years
      Market Cap Declined
      Σ Retained
      $1.06B
      Δ Market Cap
      $-246.1M
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
      INTC
      N/A
      Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
      Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
      Σ Retained
      $-22.02B
      Δ Market Cap
      +$74.94B
      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
      > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

      Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

      Learn more →
      COO
      106.7% Overvalued
      Price is 106.7% above estimated fair value
      Current Price: $62.36
      Fair Value: $30.17
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued
      INTC
      Insufficient Data
      Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
      Current Price: $99.61
      Fair Value: $0.00
      Strongly undervalued
      Undervalued
      Fairly valued
      Overvalued
      Strongly overvalued

      Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

      Learn more →
      COO

      What growth rate is the market pricing in at $62?

      +17.0%
      Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
      Standard FCF implies +17.3%

      The market implies +17.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

      Standard FCF implies a demanding +17.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

      INTC

      Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

      Economic Moat Score

      Learn more →
      COO
      61/100
      Narrow Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
      INTC
      17/100
      No Moat
      70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

      No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

      Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

      Forensic Accounting

      Learn more →
      COO
      -2.49
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
      INTC
      -2.59
      Unlikely Manipulator
      Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

      M-Score Trend

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

      Ownership Breakdown

      Learn more →
      COO
      Insiders 0.6%Institutions 105.9%
      No. of Institutional Holders963
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
      INTC
      Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
      No. of Institutional Holders3,201
      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

      Insider Buying Activity

      Learn more →
      COO
      0
      Buys (3M)
      10
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $2.52M
      LUCCHESE CYNTHIA L
      Director
      $149,963
      @ $84.06 · 2025-12-22
      RIVAS MARIA
      Director
      $82,130
      @ $82.13 · 2025-12-18
      KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
      Director
      $165,000
      @ $82.50 · 2025-12-17
      SHEFFIELD HOLLY R
      Officer
      $99,322
      @ $80.75 · 2025-12-16
      WHITE ALBERT G III
      Chief Executive Officer
      $808,000
      @ $80.80 · 2025-12-16
      KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
      Director
      $136,780
      @ $68.39 · 2025-09-29
      WARNER GERARD H, III
      Officer
      $100,384
      @ $69.23 · 2025-09-05
      WHITE ALBERT G III
      Chief Executive Officer
      $683,900
      @ $68.39 · 2025-09-05
      MCBRIDE DANIEL G
      Chief Operating Officer
      $195,120
      @ $65.04 · 2025-09-02
      ANDREWS BRIAN G
      Chief Financial Officer
      $100,162
      @ $65.68 · 2025-09-02
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
      INTC
      0
      Buys (3M)
      1
      Buys (12M)
      Total value (12M): $249,985
      ZINSNER DAVID A
      Chief Financial Officer
      $249,985
      @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,198
      @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
      GELSINGER PATRICK P
      Chief Executive Officer
      $251,946
      @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

      Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

      Insider Selling Activity

      Learn more →
      COO
      0
      Sells (3M)
      0
      Sells (12M)
      WHITE ALBERT G III
      Chief Executive Officer
      $12.71M
      @ $110.53 · 2024-09-19
      RICUPATI AGOSTINO
      Officer
      $172,955
      @ $108.03 · 2024-09-10
      ANDREWS BRIAN G
      Chief Financial Officer
      $2.63M
      @ $105.90 · 2024-09-05
      MCBRIDE DANIEL G
      Chief Operating Officer
      $12.13M
      @ $105.48 · 2024-09-04
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
      INTC
      0
      Sells (3M)
      1
      Sells (12M)
      Total value (12M): $981,000
      MILLER BOISE APRIL
      Officer
      $981,000
      @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
      HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
      General Counsel
      $650,000
      @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

      Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

      🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

      Learn more →
      COO
      FearGreed
      😨Fear(31/100)

      "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
      INTC
      FearGreed
      😏Greed(74/100)

      "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

      Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

      ⚖️ Buffett Signal

      Learn more →
      COO
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (31)
      INTC
      Awaiting DCF Data

      The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

      DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
      View COO Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis
      COO vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io