Compare StocksCOO vs CRM

The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, COO is overvalued at $66, with a DCF intrinsic value of $30 and a margin of safety of -116%. CRM is undervalued at $152, with an intrinsic value of $271 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

COO
The Cooper Companies, Inc.
$65.91
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$151.78

Rewards

COO
  • Gross margin of 65.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • 10 insider purchases over the past 12 months with a buy/sell ratio above 3:1 — a sustained pattern of insider confidence.
  • PEG ratio of 0.66 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
COO
CRM
Valuation
$424.28M
Free Cash Flow
$16.55B
3.30%
FCF Yield
13.32%
55.86
Trailing P/E
17.57
13.18
Forward P/E
9.80
Quality & Moat
-0.87%
ROIC
9.61%
2.85%
ROE
16.91%
65.55%
Gross Margin
77.64%
0.66
PEG Ratio
0.72
Balance Sheet Safety
0.31
Net Debt / Equity
0.90
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.92
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.38
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.16%
COO: 2Ties: 1CRM: 9
COOCRM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
COO

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
COO
$-0.23
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.06B
Δ Market Cap
$-246.1M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CRM
$-7.99
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-117.14B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
COO
116.2% Overvalued
Price is 116.2% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $65.91
Fair Value: $30.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CRM
43.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 43.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $151.78
Fair Value: $270.69
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
COO

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+17.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +15.9%

The market implies +17.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +15.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $152?

+3.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -2.8%

The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
COO
61/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
COO
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
COO
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 107.3%
No. of Institutional Holders987
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 94.3%Retail & Other 2.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,721
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
COO
0
Buys (3M)
10
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.52M
LUCCHESE CYNTHIA L
Director
$149,963
@ $84.06 · 2025-12-22
RIVAS MARIA
Director
$82,130
@ $82.13 · 2025-12-18
KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
Director
$165,000
@ $82.50 · 2025-12-17
SHEFFIELD HOLLY R
Officer
$99,322
@ $80.75 · 2025-12-16
WHITE ALBERT G III
Chief Executive Officer
$808,000
@ $80.80 · 2025-12-16
KURZIUS LAWRENCE ERIK
Director
$136,780
@ $68.39 · 2025-09-29
WARNER GERARD H, III
Officer
$100,384
@ $69.23 · 2025-09-05
WHITE ALBERT G III
Chief Executive Officer
$683,900
@ $68.39 · 2025-09-05
MCBRIDE DANIEL G
Chief Operating Officer
$195,120
@ $65.04 · 2025-09-02
ANDREWS BRIAN G
Chief Financial Officer
$100,162
@ $65.68 · 2025-09-02
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
5
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $27.38M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$865,827
@ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
COO
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
WHITE ALBERT G III
Chief Executive Officer
$12.71M
@ $110.53 · 2024-09-19
RICUPATI AGOSTINO
Officer
$172,955
@ $108.03 · 2024-09-10
ANDREWS BRIAN G
Chief Financial Officer
$2.63M
@ $105.90 · 2024-09-05
MCBRIDE DANIEL G
Chief Operating Officer
$12.13M
@ $105.48 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
COO
FearGreed
😐Neutral(45/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CRM
FearGreed
🥶Extreme Fear(18/100)

"Mr. Market is panicking — potential buying opportunity if fundamentals are strong"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
COO
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (45)
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Extreme Fear (18)
View COO Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: COO vs CRM

Is The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 43.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $271 vs. price $152), compared to COO's -116.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $30 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.?

COO scores 61/100 (Narrow moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. COO scores 3.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.?

Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 13.3% free cash flow yield, compared to The Cooper Companies, Inc.'s 3.3%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Cooper Companies, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc.?

CRM earns 9.6% ROIC versus COO's -0.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.