Compare StocksCOIN vs QCOM

Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, COIN is undervalued at $163, with a DCF intrinsic value of $373 and a margin of safety of 56%. QCOM is overvalued at $226, with an intrinsic value of $128 and a margin of safety of -76%. Of the two, COIN has the wider margin of safety.

COIN
Coinbase Global, Inc.
$163.26
VS
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$226.11

Rewards

COIN
  • Gross margin of 85.5% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $10.72 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • Trailing P/E of 59.8x is 64% below the historical average of 168.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.
QCOM
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • QUALCOMM Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 23.3% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

COIN
  • Coinbase Global, Inc. scores only 16/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • Share count has increased by 16% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • FCF yield of 5.6% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
QCOM
  • FCF yield of 5.4% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • 15 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
COIN
QCOM
Valuation
$2.41B
Free Cash Flow
$12.82B
5.60%
FCF Yield
5.38%
59.80
Trailing P/E
24.34
32.88
Forward P/E
21.20
Quality & Moat
-1.64%
ROIC
18.22%
6.69%
ROE
36.08%
85.47%
Gross Margin
54.80%
1.01
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
Net cash
Net Debt / Equity
0.20
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
-2.47
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.42
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.72%
COIN: 3Ties: 2QCOM: 7
COINQCOM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
COIN

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

QCOM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
COIN
$13.32
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.93B
Δ Market Cap
+$52.40B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
QCOM
$5.06
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$11.96B
Δ Market Cap
+$60.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
COIN
56.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 56.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $163.26
Fair Value: $372.73
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
QCOM
178.3% Overvalued
Price is 178.3% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $226.11
Fair Value: $81.25
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
COIN

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $163?

+14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +5.4%

The market implies +14.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +5.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

QCOM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $226?

+17.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +7.0%

The market implies +17.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +7.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
COIN
16/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable competitive advantage detected. The business shows limited evidence of pricing power, consistent returns, or capital efficiency.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
QCOM
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by reinvestment efficiency. Revenue Predictability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
COIN
-2.24
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
QCOM
-3.16
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
COIN
Insiders 1.3%Institutions 68.5%Retail & Other 30.2%
No. of Institutional Holders1,676
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
QCOM
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 84.8%Retail & Other 15.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,615
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
COIN
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
QCOM
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
COIN
5
Sells (3M)
34
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $184.56M
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$324,366
@ $158.15 · 2026-06-05
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$346,683
@ $176.88 · 2026-05-27
BROCK LAWRENCE J
Officer
$1.25M
@ $189.01 · 2026-05-22
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $205.64 · 2026-05-15
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $200.00 · 2026-04-16
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.01M
@ $201.60 · 2026-03-16
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.00M
@ $200.00 · 2026-03-04
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$230,021
@ $175.05 · 2026-02-27
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$170,122
@ $154.38 · 2026-02-24
BROCK LAWRENCE J
Officer
$744,327
@ $154.39 · 2026-02-24
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$56.50M
@ $154.95 · 2026-02-06
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$2.01M
@ $250.00 · 2026-01-15
ARMSTRONG BRIAN
Chief Executive Officer
$9.96M
@ $248.96 · 2026-01-05
WILSON FREDERICK R
Director
$2.34M
@ $234.37 · 2026-01-02
ARMSTRONG BRIAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.01M
@ $250.15 · 2025-12-22
ARMSTRONG BRIAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.95M
@ $273.86 · 2025-12-08
WILSON FREDERICK R
Director
$2.59M
@ $259.19 · 2025-12-01
ARMSTRONG BRIAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.29M
@ $257.31 · 2025-11-26
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$253,761
@ $260.00 · 2025-11-26
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$2.94M
@ $246.18 · 2025-11-25
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$436,904
@ $244.49 · 2025-11-24
BROCK LAWRENCE J
Officer
$1.48M
@ $250.58 · 2025-11-24
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$225,879
@ $259.93 · 2025-11-20
ARMSTRONG BRIAN
Chief Executive Officer
$10.87M
@ $271.87 · 2025-11-17
CHOI EMILIE MONICA
President
$31.09M
@ $310.88 · 2025-11-11
WILSON FREDERICK R
Director
$3.01M
@ $301.46 · 2025-11-06
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$3.46M
@ $345.88 · 2025-10-01
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$3.05M
@ $304.52 · 2025-09-02
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$4.80M
@ $310.80 · 2025-08-25
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$527,713
@ $300.52 · 2025-08-22
BROCK LAWRENCE J
Officer
$1.84M
@ $311.37 · 2025-08-22
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$264,819
@ $304.74 · 2025-08-20
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$3.49M
@ $348.64 · 2025-07-02
HAAS ALESIA J
Chief Financial Officer
$1.08M
@ $360.20 · 2025-06-25
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$546,608
@ $280.02 · 2025-06-18
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$2.45M
@ $245.36 · 2025-06-02
GREWAL PAUL
Officer
$3.46M
@ $267.29 · 2025-05-27
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$457,840
@ $266.96 · 2025-05-22
BROCK LAWRENCE J
Officer
$1.59M
@ $268.66 · 2025-05-22
JONES JENNIFER N
Officer
$229,885
@ $264.54 · 2025-05-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
QCOM
3
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $12.65M
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,380
@ $197.35 · 2026-06-11
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$529,741
@ $211.90 · 2026-05-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$325,854
@ $130.34 · 2026-04-13
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$330,815
@ $132.33 · 2026-03-12
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$458,799
@ $137.65 · 2026-02-06
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$577,620
@ $173.30 · 2026-01-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$2.20M
@ $175.29 · 2025-12-19
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$2.83M
@ $178.01 · 2025-12-16
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.28M
@ $178.03 · 2025-12-16
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$567,702
@ $170.33 · 2025-11-07
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$1.38M
@ $166.06 · 2025-10-20
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$522,808
@ $156.86 · 2025-09-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$122,463
@ $154.82 · 2025-08-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$493,610
@ $148.10 · 2025-08-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$537,560
@ $161.28 · 2025-07-02
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$486,965
@ $146.10 · 2025-06-02
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$120,808
@ $153.70 · 2025-05-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$465,846
@ $139.77 · 2025-05-05
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$91,442
@ $141.11 · 2025-04-09
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$119,900
@ $132.63 · 2025-04-08
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$235,262
@ $132.10 · 2025-04-04
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$523,292
@ $156.82 · 2025-03-03
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$130,074
@ $174.83 · 2025-02-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$509,397
@ $169.80 · 2025-02-12
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$3.28M
@ $169.83 · 2025-02-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$463,851
@ $154.62 · 2025-01-02
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$409,056
@ $158.12 · 2024-12-16
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$1.67M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$1.24M
@ $160.59 · 2024-12-10
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$484,617
@ $161.54 · 2024-12-05
MARTIN NEIL A
Officer
$202,120
@ $155.00 · 2024-11-21
PALKHIWALA AKASH J
Chief Operating Officer
$491,349
@ $163.78 · 2024-11-14
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.38M
@ $172.09 · 2024-11-08
CHAPLIN ANN C
General Counsel
$313,779
@ $165.06 · 2024-11-04
ROGERS ALEXANDER H
Officer
$539,157
@ $166.15 · 2024-10-02
THOMPSON JAMES H.
Chief Technology Officer
$1.36M
@ $169.80 · 2024-10-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
COIN
FearGreed
😨Fear(23/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
QCOM
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
COIN
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
QCOM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View COIN Full AnalysisView QCOM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: COIN vs QCOM

Is Coinbase Global, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, COIN trades at a 56.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $373 vs. price $163), compared to QCOM's -76.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $128 vs. $226).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Coinbase Global, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM scores 73/100 (Wide moat), while COIN scores 16/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Coinbase Global, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) generates a 5.6% free cash flow yield, compared to QUALCOMM Incorporated's 5.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Coinbase Global, Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated?

QCOM earns 18.2% ROIC versus COIN's -1.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.