Compare StocksCNP vs GOOGL

CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

CNP
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
$43.35
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$385.69

Rewards

CNP
    GOOGL
    • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
    • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
    • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

    Risks

    CNP
    • Trailing P/E of 26.6x is 27% above the historical average of 20.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
    • PEG ratio of 3.97 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
    • High leverage (2.16x debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
    GOOGL
    • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CNP
    GOOGL
    Valuation
    $-4.95B
    Free Cash Flow
    $73.27B
    -17.44%
    FCF Yield
    1.57%
    26.60
    Trailing P/E
    29.42
    20.82
    Forward P/E
    27.06
    Quality & Moat
    4.52%
    ROIC
    20.98%
    9.19%
    ROE
    27.61%
    45.92%
    Gross Margin
    60.37%
    3.97
    PEG Ratio
    0.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    2.16
    Debt / Equity
    0.20
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    6.41
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    -0.19
    2.12%
    Dividend Yield
    0.22%
    CNP: 3Ties: 1GOOGL: 8
    CNPGOOGL

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CNP

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    GOOGL

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CNP
    $4.53
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.36B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$6.15B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    GOOGL
    $9.18
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $288.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$2.65T
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CNP
    2822.1% Overvalued
    Price is 2822.1% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $43.35
    Fair Value: $1.48
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    GOOGL
    241.8% Overvalued
    Price is 241.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $385.69
    Fair Value: $112.84
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CNP

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    GOOGL

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $386?

    +23.5%
    Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

    Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CNP
    36/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    GOOGL
    89/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CNP
    -2.57
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    GOOGL
    -2.92
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CNP
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 101.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,091
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    GOOGL
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders7,168
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CNP
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $100,772
    FITCH LAURIE LEE
    Director
    $100,772
    @ $37.32 · 2025-05-12
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    GOOGL
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CNP
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $240,746
    SMITH PHILLIP R
    Director
    $240,746
    @ $38.83 · 2025-11-06
    POUND THEODORE F III
    Director
    $210,554
    @ $34.50 · 2025-03-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    GOOGL
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    No open market insider sales found.
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CNP
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(62/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    GOOGL
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(73/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CNP
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
    GOOGL
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (73)
    View CNP Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis
    CNP vs GOOGL: Which Is the Better Buy? | SafetyMargin.io