Compare StocksCMS vs PFE

CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) vs Pfizer, Inc. (PFE): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CMS is overvalued at $72, with a DCF intrinsic value of $11 and a margin of safety of -547%. PFE is undervalued at $25, with an intrinsic value of $127985960274 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, PFE has the wider margin of safety.

CMS
CMS Energy Corporation
$71.99
VS
PFE
Pfizer, Inc.
$25.01

Rewards

CMS
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.38 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
PFE
  • Gross margin of 74.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Trailing P/E of 19.1x is 37% below the historical average of 30.4x — potentially undervalued relative to its own history.

Risks

CMS
  • CMS Energy Corporation scores only 25/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • PEG ratio of 2.78 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • High leverage (1.83x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
PFE
  • ROIC has declined by 15.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • PEG ratio of 2.94 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 1.38 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CMS
PFE
Valuation
$-2.20B
Free Cash Flow
$12.38B
-9.74%
FCF Yield
N/A
21.62
Trailing P/E
19.09
17.31
Forward P/E
8.85
Quality & Moat
4.02%
ROIC
10.19%
9.16%
ROE
8.31%
40.31%
Gross Margin
74.80%
2.78
PEG Ratio
2.94
Balance Sheet Safety
1.83
Net Debt / Equity
0.57
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
6.32
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.03
3.17%
Dividend Yield
6.88%
CMS: 2Ties: 1PFE: 8
CMSPFE

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CMS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

PFE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CMS
$2.73
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.09B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.98B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
PFE
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-10.61B
Δ Market Cap
$-26.34
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CMS
547.0% Overvalued
Price is 547.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $71.99
Fair Value: $11.13
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
PFE
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $25.01
Fair Value: $127985960274.09
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CMS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

PFE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $25?

-14.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -15.0%

The market implies -14.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding -15.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CMS
25/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though margin stability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
PFE
35/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CMS
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
PFE
-2.53
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CMS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 100.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,136
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
PFE
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 69.5%Retail & Other 30.4%
No. of Institutional Holders3,661
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CMS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $153,398
LEOPOLD DIANE
Director
$153,398
@ $76.70 · 2026-02-25
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
PFE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
BLAYLOCK RONALD E
Director
$499,072
@ $25.65 · 2025-02-13
GOTTLIEB SCOTT
Director
$28,240
@ $28.24 · 2024-10-30
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CMS
1
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.40M
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$222,930
@ $74.31 · 2026-05-26
MCINTOSH SCOTT B.
Officer
$136,859
@ $78.21 · 2026-03-02
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$312,940
@ $78.23 · 2026-02-27
RUSSELL JOHN G.
Director
$1.13M
@ $75.75 · 2026-02-20
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$289,882
@ $72.47 · 2025-11-03
SNYDER LAUREN Y
Officer
$158,199
@ $71.26 · 2025-09-05
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$147,246
@ $73.62 · 2025-08-08
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$161,790
@ $73.61 · 2025-05-06
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$147,540
@ $73.77 · 2025-03-03
WRIGHT LAURA H
Director
$174,609
@ $69.84 · 2025-02-19
MCINTOSH SCOTT B.
Officer
$467,392
@ $69.76 · 2025-02-13
RUSSELL JOHN G.
Director
$1.89M
@ $65.85 · 2024-12-19
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$134,443
@ $67.22 · 2024-12-13
MCINTOSH SCOTT B.
Officer
$64,116
@ $68.50 · 2024-11-21
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$136,345
@ $68.17 · 2024-11-18
HOFMEISTER BRANDON J
Officer
$137,709
@ $68.85 · 2024-09-04
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
PFE
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51,400
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$51,400
@ $25.70 · 2026-06-09
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$64,825
@ $25.93 · 2025-03-04
DAMICO JENNIFER B.
Officer
$147,714
@ $28.66 · 2024-08-13
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CMS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
PFE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CMS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
PFE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
View CMS Full AnalysisView PFE Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CMS vs PFE

Is CMS Energy Corporation or Pfizer, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, PFE trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $127985960274 vs. price $25), compared to CMS's -547.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $11 vs. $72).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, CMS Energy Corporation or Pfizer, Inc.?

PFE scores 35/100 (None moat), while CMS scores 25/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is CMS Energy Corporation in financial distress?

CMS's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. PFE scores 1.4 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, CMS Energy Corporation or Pfizer, Inc.?

PFE earns 10.2% ROIC versus CMS's 4.0%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, CMS Energy Corporation's or Pfizer, Inc.'s?

CMS's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to PFE's 24/100 (Unsafe). CMS has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.