Compare StocksCMI vs INTU

Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CMI is undervalued at $527, with a DCF intrinsic value of $698 and a margin of safety of 25%. INTU is undervalued at $321, with an intrinsic value of $565 and a margin of safety of 43%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

CMI
Cummins Inc.
$526.97
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$320.98

Rewards

CMI
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $1.68 of earning power — management is creating shareholder value.
  • Altman Z-Score of 4.61 indicates very low bankruptcy risk — the company is firmly in the safe zone.
INTU
  • Intuit Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 81.0% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CMI
  • 19 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
INTU

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CMI
    INTU
    Valuation
    $2.23B
    Free Cash Flow
    $8.62B
    3.07%
    FCF Yield
    10.05%
    26.93
    Trailing P/E
    19.51
    15.27
    Forward P/E
    11.74
    Quality & Moat
    14.70%
    ROIC
    10.90%
    21.11%
    ROE
    23.60%
    25.77%
    Gross Margin
    80.98%
    1.06
    PEG Ratio
    1.08
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.31
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.06
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    0.87
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.18
    1.67%
    Dividend Yield
    1.74%
    CMI: 1Ties: 3INTU: 8
    CMIINTU

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CMI

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    INTU

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CMI
    $7.92
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $4.58B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$36.28B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTU
    $-11.39
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $7.83B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-89.13B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CMI
    24.5% Margin of Safety
    Price is 24.5% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $526.97
    Fair Value: $698.13
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTU
    43.2% Margin of Safety
    Price is 43.2% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $320.98
    Fair Value: $565.45
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CMI

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $527?

    +11.8%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +15.1%

    The market implies +11.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +15.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTU

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $321?

    +5.3%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.7%

    The market implies +5.3% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CMI
    55/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTU
    94/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CMI
    -2.51
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTU
    -2.98
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CMI
    Insiders 0.2%Institutions 87.8%Retail & Other 12.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,696
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTU
    Insiders 2.4%Institutions 93.5%Retail & Other 4.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,541
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CMI
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    STONE JOHN H
    Director
    $332,080
    @ $332.08 · 2025-05-16
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTU
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $541,665
    PRABHU VASANT M.
    Director
    $541,665
    @ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CMI
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.19M
    NEWSOME EARL JR.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $399,410
    @ $572.22 · 2026-08-24
    JACKSON DONALD G
    Officer
    $518,975
    @ $710.92 · 2026-05-14
    BUSH JENNIFER MARY
    Officer
    $3.48M
    @ $696.21 · 2026-05-12
    STONER NATHAN R
    Officer
    $421,294
    @ $694.06 · 2026-05-11
    FETCH BONNIE J
    Officer
    $456,524
    @ $700.19 · 2026-05-11
    MERRITT BRETT MICHAEL
    Officer
    $483,153
    @ $689.23 · 2026-05-11
    LAMB-HALE NICOLE
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $685.34 · 2026-05-08
    BOAKYE MARVIN
    Officer
    $2.37M
    @ $679.90 · 2026-05-08
    DAVIS AMY ROCHELLE
    Officer
    $2.28M
    @ $561.34 · 2026-03-03
    JACKSON DONALD G
    Officer
    $2.32M
    @ $465.64 · 2026-02-24
    DAVIS AMY ROCHELLE
    Officer
    $1.09M
    @ $586.64 · 2026-02-23
    NEWSOME EARL JR.
    Chief Technology Officer
    $758,776
    @ $583.67 · 2026-02-23
    MILLER WILLIAM I
    Director
    $10.81M
    @ $597.10 · 2026-02-11
    BUSH JENNIFER MARY
    Officer
    $2.50M
    @ $584.93 · 2026-02-10
    MERRITT BRETT MICHAEL
    Officer
    $709,514
    @ $489.32 · 2025-11-25
    RUMSEY JENNIFER W.
    Chief Executive Officer
    $2.17M
    @ $473.89 · 2025-11-11
    SMITH MARK ANDREW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $6.17M
    @ $470.66 · 2025-11-06
    SMITH MARK ANDREW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $89,819
    @ $449.10 · 2025-10-30
    SMITH MARK ANDREW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.51M
    @ $439.30 · 2025-10-06
    SMITH MARK ANDREW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $3.77M
    @ $415.73 · 2025-09-17
    ENRIGHT ROBERT J
    Officer
    $748,210
    @ $402.26 · 2025-08-22
    DAVIS AMY ROCHELLE
    Officer
    $2.02M
    @ $402.88 · 2025-08-14
    SMITH MARK ANDREW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $400.20 · 2025-08-13
    BUSH JENNIFER MARY
    Officer
    $201,826
    @ $388.13 · 2025-08-08
    PETERS LUTHER EARL
    Officer
    $1.89M
    @ $389.19 · 2025-08-08
    SMITH MARK ANDREW
    Chief Financial Officer
    $4.28M
    @ $374.57 · 2025-02-10
    BARNER SHARON R.
    Officer
    $798,403
    @ $369.12 · 2024-11-21
    BARNER SHARON R.
    Officer
    $784,071
    @ $362.49 · 2024-11-13
    DI LEO ALLEN BRUNO VITO
    Director
    $1.77M
    @ $358.56 · 2024-11-12
    JACKSON DONALD G
    Officer
    $1.78M
    @ $356.21 · 2024-11-12
    BARNER SHARON R.
    Officer
    $775,052
    @ $358.32 · 2024-11-11
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTU
    3
    Sells (3M)
    11
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $4.34M
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $92,728
    @ $325.36 · 2026-09-08
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $314,288
    @ $346.90 · 2026-08-27
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $74,499
    @ $262.32 · 2026-06-23
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $80,145
    @ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $289,448
    @ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $457,046
    @ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $840,097
    @ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $741,172
    @ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $219,763
    @ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $435,354
    @ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $792,160
    @ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $665,951
    @ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $27,930
    @ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $255,887
    @ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
    DALZELL RICHARD L
    Director
    $521,891
    @ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $689,400
    @ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $2.03M
    @ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $887,583
    @ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $1.36M
    @ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
    BALAZS ALEX G
    Chief Technology Officer
    $1.12M
    @ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $26.12M
    @ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $19.29M
    @ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $30.46M
    @ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $11.66M
    @ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
    NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
    Officer
    $340,143
    @ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
    MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
    General Counsel
    $12.18M
    @ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $5.00M
    @ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
    TESSEL MARIANNA
    Officer
    $4.43M
    @ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
    BURTON EVE B
    Director
    $1.02M
    @ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
    HOTZ LAUREN DALE
    Officer
    $667,838
    @ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $814,350
    @ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
    FENNELL LAURA A
    Officer
    $2.94M
    @ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
    AUJLA SANDEEP S
    Chief Financial Officer
    $68,506
    @ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CMI
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(39/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTU
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(33/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CMI
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
    INTU
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (33)
    View CMI Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CMI vs INTU

    Is Cummins Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 43.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $565 vs. price $321), compared to CMI's 24.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $698 vs. $527).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, Cummins Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

    INTU scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while CMI scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Which company has better free cash flow, Cummins Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

    Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 10.0% free cash flow yield, compared to Cummins Inc.'s 3.1%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Cummins Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

    CMI earns 14.7% ROIC versus INTU's 10.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, Cummins Inc.'s or Intuit Inc.'s?

    INTU's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CMI's 94/100 (Very Safe). INTU has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.