Compare StocksCMI vs GOOGL

Cummins Inc. (CMI) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)

CMI
Cummins Inc.
$540.24
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$307.13

Rewards

CMI
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $7.92 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • PEG ratio of 0.64 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

CMI
  • 6 insider sales totaling $19.8M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CMI
GOOGL
Valuation
$2.39B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
3.20%
FCF Yield
1.97%
26.38
Trailing P/E
28.41
17.17
Forward P/E
22.88
Quality & Moat
13.49%
ROIC
20.83%
21.20%
ROE
31.83%
25.76%
Gross Margin
59.65%
0.64
PEG Ratio
0.91
Balance Sheet Safety
0.61
Debt / Equity
0.16
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.87
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.40
1.45%
Dividend Yield
0.27%
CMI: 5Ties: 1GOOGL: 6
CMIGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CMI

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CMI
$7.92
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.58B
Δ Market Cap
+$36.28B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CMI
35.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 35.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $540.24
Fair Value: $842.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
20.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 20.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $307.13
Fair Value: $384.04
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CMI

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $540?

+12.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +14.6%

The market implies +12.2% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +14.6%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $307?

+12.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +20.2%

The market implies +12.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +20.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CMI
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving revenue predictability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CMI
-2.51
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CMI
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 87.4%Retail & Other 12.3%
No. of Institutional Holders2,375
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.6%
No. of Institutional Holders7,206
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CMI
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $332,080
STONE JOHN H
Director
$332,080
@ $332.08 · 2025-05-16
WILTROUT JEFFREY T
Officer
$80,401
@ $285.11 · 2024-05-24
BOAKYE MARVIN
Officer
$499,133
@ $286.04 · 2024-05-20
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CMI
6
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $46.04M
DAVIS AMY ROCHELLE
Officer
$2.28M
@ $561.34 · 2026-03-03
JACKSON DONALD G
Officer
$2.32M
@ $465.64 · 2026-02-24
DAVIS AMY ROCHELLE
Officer
$1.09M
@ $586.64 · 2026-02-23
NEWSOME EARL JR.
Chief Technology Officer
$758,776
@ $583.67 · 2026-02-23
MILLER WILLIAM I
Director
$10.81M
@ $597.10 · 2026-02-11
BUSH JENNIFER MARY
Officer
$2.50M
@ $584.93 · 2026-02-10
MERRITT BRETT MICHAEL
Officer
$709,514
@ $489.32 · 2025-11-25
RUMSEY JENNIFER W.
Chief Executive Officer
$2.17M
@ $473.89 · 2025-11-11
SMITH MARK ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$6.17M
@ $470.66 · 2025-11-06
SMITH MARK ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$89,819
@ $449.10 · 2025-10-30
SMITH MARK ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$3.51M
@ $439.30 · 2025-10-06
SMITH MARK ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$3.77M
@ $415.73 · 2025-09-17
ENRIGHT ROBERT J
Officer
$748,210
@ $402.26 · 2025-08-22
DAVIS AMY ROCHELLE
Officer
$2.02M
@ $402.88 · 2025-08-14
SMITH MARK ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$5.00M
@ $400.20 · 2025-08-13
PETERS LUTHER EARL
Officer
$1.89M
@ $389.19 · 2025-08-08
BUSH JENNIFER MARY
Officer
$201,826
@ $388.13 · 2025-08-08
SMITH MARK ANDREW
Chief Financial Officer
$4.28M
@ $374.57 · 2025-02-10
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$798,403
@ $369.12 · 2024-11-21
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$784,071
@ $362.49 · 2024-11-13
DI LEO ALLEN BRUNO VITO
Director
$1.77M
@ $358.56 · 2024-11-12
JACKSON DONALD G
Officer
$1.78M
@ $356.21 · 2024-11-12
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$775,052
@ $358.32 · 2024-11-11
SATTERTHWAITE LIVINGSTON LORD
Officer
$7.47M
@ $308.24 · 2024-08-23
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$1.98M
@ $304.77 · 2024-08-21
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $300.35 · 2024-08-15
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$708,110
@ $296.28 · 2024-05-10
BARNER SHARON R.
Officer
$1.11M
@ $286.86 · 2024-05-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CMI
FearGreed
😐Neutral(52/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(60/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CMI
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (52)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (60)
View CMI Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis