Compare StocksCMG vs MS

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CMG is fairly valued at $37, with a DCF intrinsic value of $46 and a margin of safety of 19%. MS is undervalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
$37.22
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42

Rewards

CMG
  • Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. scores 85/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 19.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CMG
  • FCF yield of 2.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • High leverage (2.16x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CMG
MS
Valuation
$1.12B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
2.37%
FCF Yield
N/A
34.46
Trailing P/E
17.01
27.23
Forward P/E
15.45
Quality & Moat
20.75%
ROIC
3.68%
49.56%
ROE
14.08%
39.36%
Gross Margin
87.64%
2.00
PEG Ratio
1.99
Balance Sheet Safety
2.16
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.08
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.19%
CMG: 2Ties: 2MS: 5
CMGMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CMG

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CMG
$2.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$4.30B
Δ Market Cap
+$9.93B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CMG
18.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 18.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $37.22
Fair Value: $45.89
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CMG

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $37?

+14.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +19.2%

The market implies +14.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +19.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CMG
85/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CMG
-2.95
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CMG
Insiders 0.7%Institutions 93.3%Retail & Other 6.0%
No. of Institutional Holders1,725
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CMG
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GUTIERREZ MAURICIO
Director
$498,200
@ $53.00 · 2025-03-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CMG
0
Sells (3M)
5
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $8.30M
FILI-KRUSHEL PATRICIA D
Director
$122,543
@ $36.58 · 2026-02-24
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
President
$2.44M
@ $40.01 · 2026-02-06
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
President
$2.44M
@ $36.05 · 2025-12-12
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
President
$2.15M
@ $34.67 · 2025-12-01
ESKENAZI ILENE
Officer
$1.15M
@ $43.15 · 2025-08-25
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Officer
$887,108
@ $56.32 · 2025-07-07
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
President
$3.47M
@ $55.14 · 2025-06-25
FILI-KRUSHEL PATRICIA D
Director
$106,147
@ $51.13 · 2025-06-12
HICKENLOOPER ROBIN S.
Director
$115,229
@ $51.21 · 2025-06-12
BOATWRIGHT HENRY SCOTT
Chief Executive Officer
$997,133
@ $52.48 · 2025-06-06
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Officer
$1.21M
@ $52.14 · 2025-06-04
THEODOREDIS ROGER E.
General Counsel
$5.66M
@ $49.70 · 2025-06-02
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$1.18M
@ $50.84 · 2025-05-21
MCCONNELL JAMIE
Officer
$161,829
@ $52.42 · 2025-05-14
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Officer
$1.03M
@ $49.77 · 2025-03-13
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$1.10M
@ $52.36 · 2025-02-25
MCCONNELL JAMIE
Officer
$664,426
@ $58.70 · 2025-02-10
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$902,563
@ $57.31 · 2025-02-07
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$917,261
@ $58.24 · 2025-01-07
SCHALOW LAURIE
Officer
$1.38M
@ $65.13 · 2024-12-11
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$1.01M
@ $64.37 · 2024-12-09
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$2.91M
@ $65.25 · 2024-12-06
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$920,675
@ $58.46 · 2024-11-07
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$898,567
@ $57.05 · 2024-10-07
HICKENLOOPER ROBIN S.
Director
$100,924
@ $56.38 · 2024-09-12
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$866,554
@ $55.02 · 2024-09-11
GARNER CURTIS EVANDER III
Chief Technology Officer
$951,161
@ $54.68 · 2024-08-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CMG
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CMG
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View CMG Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CMG vs MS

Is Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic value $269 vs. price $210), compared to CMG's 18.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $46 vs. $37).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

CMG scores 85/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CMG scores 6.9 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

CMG earns 20.8% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

CMG vs MS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io