Compare StocksCLX vs CRM

The Clorox Company (CLX) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CLX is overvalued at $84, with a DCF intrinsic value of $69 and a margin of safety of -22%. CRM is overvalued at $245, with an intrinsic value of $158 and a margin of safety of -55%. Of the two, CLX has the wider margin of safety.

CLX
The Clorox Company
$83.98
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$244.88

Rewards

CLX
  • The Clorox Company has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • The Clorox Company scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CLX
  • High leverage (21.65x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Net debt/EBITDA of 4.8x indicates heavy leverage — it would take over 4 years of EBITDA to pay off net debt.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 24.2% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
CRM

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CLX
    CRM
    Valuation
    $405.00M
    Free Cash Flow
    $17.73B
    3.99%
    FCF Yield
    8.80%
    17.46
    Trailing P/E
    22.43
    13.41
    Forward P/E
    15.29
    Quality & Moat
    11.69%
    ROIC
    9.19%
    163.76%
    ROE
    19.38%
    42.32%
    Gross Margin
    77.28%
    1.06
    PEG Ratio
    0.87
    Balance Sheet Safety
    21.65
    Net Debt / Equity
    0.81
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    4.79
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    2.40
    5.89%
    Dividend Yield
    0.70%
    CLX: 5Ties: 1CRM: 6
    CLXCRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CLX

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CLX
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-122.0M
    Δ Market Cap
    $-7.50B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CRM
    $-2.09
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-30.64B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CLX
    22.2% Overvalued
    Price is 22.2% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $83.98
    Fair Value: $68.72
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CRM
    55.4% Overvalued
    Price is 55.4% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $244.88
    Fair Value: $157.57
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CLX

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $84?

    +10.7%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +16.6%

    The market implies +10.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +16.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $245?

    +9.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +1.9%

    The market implies +9.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +1.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CLX
    75/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CLX
    -2.52
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CLX
    Insiders 0.7%Institutions 88.3%Retail & Other 11.0%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,421
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CRM
    Insiders 3.0%Institutions 87.5%Retail & Other 9.5%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,512
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CLX
    0
    Buys (3M)
    2
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $845,640
    BREBER PIERRE R.
    Director
    $429,124
    @ $85.82 · 2026-05-05
    BREBER PIERRE R.
    Director
    $416,516
    @ $104.13 · 2025-11-21
    BREBER PIERRE R.
    Director
    $546,285
    @ $136.57 · 2025-05-07
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    4
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.52M
    ALBER LAURA
    Director
    $500,266
    @ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,178
    @ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CLX
    0
    Sells (3M)
    0
    Sells (12M)
    REYNOLDS ERIC H
    Chief Operating Officer
    $1.86M
    @ $123.78 · 2025-09-04
    MARRINER KIRSTEN
    Officer
    $1.25M
    @ $151.48 · 2025-03-11
    HILT ANGELA CHRISTINE
    Officer
    $206,622
    @ $165.56 · 2024-12-16
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    14
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $40.38M
    CONWAY CRAIG
    Director
    $1.17M
    @ $260.61 · 2026-09-04
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CLX
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(23/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(55/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CLX
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (23)
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
    View CLX Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions: CLX vs CRM

    Is The Clorox Company or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

    Based on our discounted cash flow model, CLX trades at a -22.2% margin of safety (intrinsic value $69 vs. price $84), compared to CRM's -55.4% margin of safety (intrinsic $158 vs. $245).

    Which stock has a wider economic moat, The Clorox Company or Salesforce, Inc.?

    CLX scores 75/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

    Is The Clorox Company in financial distress?

    CLX's Altman Z-Score of 2.0 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CRM scores 3.4 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

    Which company has better free cash flow, The Clorox Company or Salesforce, Inc.?

    Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) generates a 8.8% free cash flow yield, compared to The Clorox Company's 4.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

    Which stock has higher return on invested capital, The Clorox Company or Salesforce, Inc.?

    CLX earns 11.7% ROIC versus CRM's 9.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

    Which dividend is safer, The Clorox Company's or Salesforce, Inc.'s?

    CRM's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to CLX's 24/100 (Unsafe). CRM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.