Compare StocksCL vs MCD

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs McDonald's Corporation (MCD): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CL is overvalued at $89, with a DCF intrinsic value of $45 and a margin of safety of -98%. MCD is overvalued at $279, with an intrinsic value of $212 and a margin of safety of -32%. Of the two, MCD has the wider margin of safety.

CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$89.48
VS
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
$278.61

Rewards

CL
  • Colgate-Palmolive Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Colgate-Palmolive Company scores 98/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
MCD
  • McDonald's Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • McDonald's Corporation scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.47 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CL
  • High leverage (13.49x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 10 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
MCD
  • PEG ratio of 2.64 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • 6 insider sales totaling $3.4M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CL
MCD
Valuation
$3.32B
Free Cash Flow
$5.95B
4.64%
FCF Yield
3.01%
34.68
Trailing P/E
22.99
22.13
Forward P/E
19.59
Quality & Moat
40.64%
ROIC
17.48%
363.58%
ROE
N/A
60.06%
Gross Margin
57.35%
1.62
PEG Ratio
2.64
Balance Sheet Safety
13.49
Net Debt / Equity
N/A
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.33
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.61
2.30%
Dividend Yield
2.56%
CL: 4Ties: 2MCD: 4
CLMCD

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MCD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CL
$-1.07
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MCD
$2.28
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$10.74B
Δ Market Cap
+$24.46B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CL
98.0% Overvalued
Price is 98.0% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $89.48
Fair Value: $45.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MCD
31.7% Overvalued
Price is 31.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $278.61
Fair Value: $211.57
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $89?

+15.5%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.9%

The market implies +15.5% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

MCD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $279?

+12.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +17.9%

The market implies +12.9% Owner Earnings growth, roughly in line with history — reasonably priced.

Standard FCF implies +17.9%, reflecting ongoing growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CL
98/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MCD
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CL
-3.00
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MCD
-2.62
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 88.1%Retail & Other 11.8%
No. of Institutional Holders2,617
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MCD
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 77.2%Retail & Other 22.6%
No. of Institutional Holders4,476
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MCD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CL
2
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.11M
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$203,412
@ $88.44 · 2026-05-15
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$751,633
@ $87.41 · 2026-05-07
TSOURAPAS PANAGIOTIS
Officer
$4.78M
@ $95.57 · 2026-02-12
HAZLIN JOHN
Officer
$1.98M
@ $94.25 · 2026-02-10
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$1.21M
@ $94.91 · 2026-02-06
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$1.51M
@ $95.03 · 2026-02-05
WALLACE NOEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$4.28M
@ $93.91 · 2026-02-04
DANIELS JENNIFER M.
Officer
$2.08M
@ $94.34 · 2026-02-04
SUTULA STANLEY J III
Chief Financial Officer
$9.22M
@ $94.27 · 2026-02-04
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$100,061
@ $80.89 · 2025-11-21
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$200,183
@ $88.97 · 2025-05-15
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$736,152
@ $92.02 · 2025-02-25
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$101,121
@ $95.94 · 2024-11-26
WALLACE NOEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $95.00 · 2024-11-22
SUTULA STANLEY J III
Chief Financial Officer
$4.27M
@ $94.11 · 2024-11-05
SUTULA STANLEY J III
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $93.53 · 2024-11-01
HUND-MEJEAN MARTINA
Director
$240,228
@ $103.86 · 2024-08-23
DANIELS JENNIFER M.
Officer
$2.26M
@ $102.76 · 2024-08-08
TSOURAPAS PANAGIOTIS
Officer
$1.52M
@ $102.94 · 2024-08-08
KOOYMAN JOHN W
Officer
$2.55M
@ $102.88 · 2024-08-06
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$1.64M
@ $103.28 · 2024-08-06
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$1.09M
@ $103.10 · 2024-08-06
TSOURAPAS PANAGIOTIS
Officer
$3.98M
@ $99.47 · 2024-07-31
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MCD
6
Sells (3M)
28
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $44.56M
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$1.49M
@ $284.32 · 2026-06-10
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$769,109
@ $278.36 · 2026-05-28
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$93,277
@ $280.11 · 2026-05-26
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$100,806
@ $302.72 · 2026-04-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$806,182
@ $307.00 · 2026-04-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$104,386
@ $313.47 · 2026-03-23
BARONI DARIO
Officer
$194,262
@ $323.77 · 2026-03-18
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$862,221
@ $328.34 · 2026-03-10
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$2.07M
@ $333.32 · 2026-02-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$110,033
@ $330.43 · 2026-02-23
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$17.47M
@ $332.44 · 2026-02-13
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$1.55M
@ $331.00 · 2026-02-12
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$854,106
@ $325.25 · 2026-02-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$805,079
@ $306.58 · 2026-01-12
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$795,520
@ $320.00 · 2025-12-16
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$207,270
@ $315.00 · 2025-12-12
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$2.01M
@ $305.50 · 2025-12-01
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$5.31M
@ $310.00 · 2025-11-21
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$977,095
@ $305.82 · 2025-11-14
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$3.95M
@ $300.42 · 2025-11-05
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$315,000
@ $315.00 · 2025-09-02
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$1.49M
@ $315.00 · 2025-08-20
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$310,000
@ $310.00 · 2025-08-19
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$770,970
@ $310.00 · 2025-08-06
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$296,216
@ $303.50 · 2025-08-01
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$281,221
@ $299.49 · 2025-07-23
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$300,000
@ $300.00 · 2025-07-10
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$270,920
@ $288.52 · 2025-06-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
President
$295,851
@ $315.07 · 2025-05-23
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$1.92M
@ $319.66 · 2025-05-20
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$299,072
@ $318.50 · 2025-04-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$287,616
@ $306.30 · 2025-03-24
BOYD TIFFANIE L
Officer
$309,270
@ $309.27 · 2025-02-27
STEIJAERT MANUEL JM
Officer
$3.23M
@ $308.71 · 2025-02-24
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$286,395
@ $305.00 · 2025-02-24
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$334,871
@ $304.71 · 2025-02-21
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$456,495
@ $304.33 · 2025-02-21
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$962,432
@ $300.76 · 2025-02-19
BANNER JONATHAN
Officer
$2.83M
@ $307.41 · 2025-02-13
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$3.26M
@ $310.05 · 2025-02-11
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$84,225
@ $280.75 · 2025-01-23
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$436,134
@ $290.95 · 2025-01-02
RALLS-MORRISON DESIREE ANN
Officer
$1.98M
@ $289.89 · 2024-12-31
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$319,919
@ $291.10 · 2024-12-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$321,458
@ $292.50 · 2024-11-25
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$441,470
@ $294.51 · 2024-11-01
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$321,326
@ $292.38 · 2024-10-23
FLATLEY EDITH MORGAN
Officer
$727,260
@ $310.00 · 2024-10-14
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$2.83M
@ $305.00 · 2024-09-27
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$5.51M
@ $300.02 · 2024-09-24
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$1.78M
@ $300.04 · 2024-09-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$328,128
@ $298.57 · 2024-09-23
BORDEN IAN FREDERICK
Chief Financial Officer
$397,500
@ $300.00 · 2024-09-16
KEMPCZINSKI CHRISTOPHER J
Chief Executive Officer
$1.18M
@ $300.00 · 2024-09-16
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$428,967
@ $286.36 · 2024-09-03
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$316,993
@ $288.70 · 2024-08-23
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$285,740
@ $260.00 · 2024-07-23
GROSS MARION K
Officer
$371,893
@ $248.26 · 2024-07-03
ERLINGER JOSEPH M
Officer
$285,480
@ $260.00 · 2024-06-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(55/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MCD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(47/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (55)
MCD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (47)
View CL Full AnalysisView MCD Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CL vs MCD

Is Colgate-Palmolive Company or McDonald's Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MCD trades at a -31.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $212 vs. price $279), compared to CL's -98.0% margin of safety (intrinsic $45 vs. $89).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Colgate-Palmolive Company or McDonald's Corporation?

CL scores 98/100 (Wide moat), while MCD scores 91/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Colgate-Palmolive Company or McDonald's Corporation?

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) generates a 4.6% free cash flow yield, compared to McDonald's Corporation's 3.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Colgate-Palmolive Company or McDonald's Corporation?

CL earns 40.6% ROIC versus MCD's 17.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Colgate-Palmolive Company's or McDonald's Corporation's?

MCD's dividend earns a safety score of 69/100 (Safe), compared to CL's 64/100 (Safe). MCD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CL vs MCD: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io