Compare StocksCAT vs CL

Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) vs Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-09-17, CAT is overvalued at $799, with a DCF intrinsic value of $715 and a margin of safety of -12%. CL is overvalued at $88, with an intrinsic value of $45 and a margin of safety of -93%. Of the two, CAT has the wider margin of safety.

CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
$798.57
VS
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$87.73

Rewards

CAT
  • Caterpillar Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Caterpillar Inc. scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
CL
  • Colgate-Palmolive Company has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Colgate-Palmolive Company scores 98/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CAT
  • FCF yield of 2.0% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 34.3x is 71% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • High leverage (2.02x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
CL
  • High leverage (11.31x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • Insiders have sold $30.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CAT
CL
Valuation
$7.45B
Free Cash Flow
$3.46B
2.03%
FCF Yield
4.95%
34.35
Trailing P/E
34.54
24.66
Forward P/E
21.36
Quality & Moat
20.29%
ROIC
41.39%
56.97%
ROE
267.37%
29.71%
Gross Margin
60.43%
1.37
PEG Ratio
1.59
Balance Sheet Safety
2.02
Net Debt / Equity
11.31
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.41
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.29
0.83%
Dividend Yield
2.44%
CAT: 3Ties: 2CL: 7
CATCL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CAT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CAT
$6.48
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$142.85B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CL
$-1.07
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$1.96B
Δ Market Cap
$-2.10B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CAT
11.7% Overvalued
Price is 11.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $798.57
Fair Value: $714.77
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CL
92.9% Overvalued
Price is 92.9% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $87.73
Fair Value: $45.47
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CAT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $799?

+19.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +21.4%

The market implies +19.0% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +21.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

CL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $88?

+15.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.1%

The market implies +15.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CAT
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CL
98/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CAT
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CL
-3.00
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CAT
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 73.5%Retail & Other 26.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,935
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CL
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 86.4%Retail & Other 13.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,693
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CAT
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $389,868
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$219,210
@ $876.84 · 2026-05-04
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$170,658
@ $568.86 · 2025-11-06
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$120,262
@ $320.70 · 2025-05-07
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$31,848
@ $318.48 · 2025-05-02
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$36,557
@ $365.57 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$39,857
@ $398.57 · 2024-12-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CAT
1
Sells (3M)
31
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $261.04M
CREED JOSEPH E
Chief Executive Officer
$26.21M
@ $808.98 · 2026-08-28
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$11.44M
@ $907.91 · 2026-05-14
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$5.64M
@ $909.79 · 2026-05-13
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$326,160
@ $906.00 · 2026-05-13
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$14.93M
@ $916.80 · 2026-05-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$8.48M
@ $926.25 · 2026-05-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$22.35M
@ $922.92 · 2026-05-06
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Officer
$14.40M
@ $918.71 · 2026-05-06
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$5.09M
@ $903.18 · 2026-05-05
KAISER JASON
Officer
$4.98M
@ $883.03 · 2026-05-04
CREED JOSEPH E
Chief Executive Officer
$1.80M
@ $718.93 · 2026-03-05
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.73M
@ $759.61 · 2026-02-23
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.35M
@ $763.39 · 2026-02-17
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$742,802
@ $764.20 · 2026-02-17
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$6.13M
@ $776.90 · 2026-02-13
KAISER JASON
Officer
$1.31M
@ $776.70 · 2026-02-12
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$9.59M
@ $767.08 · 2026-02-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.36M
@ $722.15 · 2026-02-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$16.31M
@ $720.11 · 2026-02-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$11.33M
@ $704.97 · 2026-02-04
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$26.66M
@ $681.08 · 2026-02-02
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$7.26M
@ $680.45 · 2026-02-02
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$10.91M
@ $682.99 · 2026-02-02
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.75M
@ $575.06 · 2025-12-31
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.71M
@ $571.44 · 2025-12-01
KAISER JASON
Officer
$6.03M
@ $563.60 · 2025-11-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.67M
@ $570.18 · 2025-11-10
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$686,664
@ $572.22 · 2025-11-05
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$8.23M
@ $562.36 · 2025-11-05
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$8.67M
@ $505.29 · 2025-10-10
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$7.94M
@ $462.65 · 2025-09-22
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer and Director
$7.09M
@ $412.87 · 2025-09-02
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$952,840
@ $410.00 · 2025-08-15
KAISER JASON
Officer
$902,650
@ $417.70 · 2025-08-11
KAISER JASON
Officer
$860,148
@ $354.70 · 2025-02-18
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $380.09 · 2025-01-16
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.57M
@ $408.59 · 2024-11-29
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.05M
@ $405.36 · 2024-11-25
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$766.00
@ $383.00 · 2024-11-15
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$5.19M
@ $410.25 · 2024-11-07
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.26M
@ $409.84 · 2024-11-06
DICKINSON DANIEL M
Director
$543,400
@ $418.00 · 2024-11-06
JOHNSON CHERYL H
Officer
$1.01M
@ $378.84 · 2024-11-04
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$368,789
@ $380.98 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CL
2
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $56.19M
CAHILL JOHN T
Director
$389,358
@ $93.37 · 2026-08-06
WALLACE NOEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$29.70M
@ $92.22 · 2026-08-05
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$203,412
@ $88.44 · 2026-05-15
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$751,633
@ $87.41 · 2026-05-07
TSOURAPAS PANAGIOTIS
Officer
$4.78M
@ $95.57 · 2026-02-12
HAZLIN JOHN
Officer
$1.98M
@ $94.25 · 2026-02-10
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$1.21M
@ $94.91 · 2026-02-06
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$1.51M
@ $95.03 · 2026-02-05
SUTULA STANLEY J III
Chief Financial Officer
$9.22M
@ $94.27 · 2026-02-04
DANIELS JENNIFER M.
Officer
$2.08M
@ $94.34 · 2026-02-04
WALLACE NOEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$4.28M
@ $93.91 · 2026-02-04
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$100,061
@ $80.89 · 2025-11-21
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$200,183
@ $88.97 · 2025-05-15
MASSEY SALLY
Officer
$736,152
@ $92.02 · 2025-02-25
MALCOLM GREGORY
Officer
$101,121
@ $95.94 · 2024-11-26
WALLACE NOEL R
Chief Executive Officer
$3.17M
@ $95.00 · 2024-11-22
SUTULA STANLEY J III
Chief Financial Officer
$4.27M
@ $94.11 · 2024-11-05
SUTULA STANLEY J III
Chief Financial Officer
$4.68M
@ $93.53 · 2024-11-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CAT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(51/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CAT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
CL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (51)
View CAT Full AnalysisView CL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CAT vs CL

Is Caterpillar Inc. or Colgate-Palmolive Company more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CAT trades at a -11.7% margin of safety (intrinsic value $715 vs. price $799), compared to CL's -92.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $45 vs. $88).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Caterpillar Inc. or Colgate-Palmolive Company?

CL scores 98/100 (Wide moat), while CAT scores 75/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, Caterpillar Inc. or Colgate-Palmolive Company?

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Caterpillar Inc.'s 2.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Caterpillar Inc. or Colgate-Palmolive Company?

CL earns 41.4% ROIC versus CAT's 20.3%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Caterpillar Inc.'s or Colgate-Palmolive Company's?

CAT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CL's 64/100 (Safe). CAT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.