Compare StocksCI vs CRM

The Cigna Group (CI) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM)

CI
The Cigna Group
$264.57
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$194.99

Rewards

CI
  • Share count has been reduced by 12% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Dividend yield of 2.36% with a consistent or growing payout over the past 4 years.
  • FCF yield of 13.8% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.7% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Management has timed buybacks well — 3 out of 4 years showed value-accretive repurchases.

Risks

CI
  • Gross margin of 9.3% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
CRM

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CI
    CRM
    Valuation
    $9.77B
    Free Cash Flow
    $16.37B
    13.82%
    FCF Yield
    8.96%
    11.93
    Trailing P/E
    25.00
    7.90
    Forward P/E
    13.08
    Quality & Moat
    10.45%
    ROIC
    8.21%
    14.23%
    ROE
    12.61%
    9.30%
    Gross Margin
    77.68%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    1.40
    Balance Sheet Safety
    0.75
    Debt / Equity
    0.30
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.89
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.65
    2.36%
    Dividend Yield
    0.90%
    CI: 6Ties: 1CRM: 4
    CICRM

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CI

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    CRM

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CI
    $-2.66
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $9.93B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-26.45B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    CRM
    $-5.25
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Market Cap Declined
    Σ Retained
    $14.67B
    Δ Market Cap
    $-76.99B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CI
    44.1% Margin of Safety
    Price is 44.1% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $264.57
    Fair Value: $473.23
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    CRM
    13.0% Margin of Safety
    Price is 13.0% below estimated fair value
    Current Price: $194.99
    Fair Value: $224.03
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CI

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $265?

    +4.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -2.5%

    The market implies +4.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

    Standard FCF implies a demanding -2.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

    CRM

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    +11.1%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies +0.3%

    The market implies +11.1% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CI
    34/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though reinvestment efficiency shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    CRM
    58/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CI
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    CRM
    -2.73
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CI
    Insiders 1.4%Institutions 91.6%Retail & Other 6.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders2,182
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    CRM
    Insiders 2.7%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 12.3%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,962
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CI
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $999,916
    CORDANI DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $999,916
    @ $241.88 · 2025-11-03
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    CRM
    0
    Buys (3M)
    3
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $26.38M
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $500,722
    @ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
    MORFIT G MASON
    Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
    $25.02M
    @ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
    KIRK DAVID BLAIR
    Director
    $865,827
    @ $254.66 · 2025-09-09
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CI
    2
    Sells (3M)
    4
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $11.33M
    NEVILLE EVERETT
    Officer
    $496,636
    @ $288.91 · 2026-03-02
    JONES NICOLE S.
    Officer
    $666,515
    @ $288.91 · 2026-03-02
    EVANKO BRIAN C
    President
    $1.61M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-10-03
    JONES NICOLE S.
    General Counsel
    $8.56M
    @ $300.00 · 2025-08-15
    GRANGER ELDER
    Director
    $737,392
    @ $310.35 · 2025-03-14
    EDER NOELLE K
    Officer
    $3.18M
    @ $320.00 · 2025-03-07
    CORDANI DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $8.17M
    @ $308.12 · 2025-03-03
    JONES NICOLE S.
    Officer
    $1.51M
    @ $308.12 · 2025-03-03
    DELANEY WILLIAM J.
    Director
    $922,152
    @ $342.68 · 2024-08-19
    JONES NICOLE S.
    General Counsel
    $7.29M
    @ $330.96 · 2024-08-12
    TRIPLETT MICHAEL W
    Officer
    $2.25M
    @ $329.94 · 2024-08-12
    EVANKO BRIAN C
    Officer
    $1.65M
    @ $345.01 · 2024-06-24
    GRANGER ELDER
    Director
    $181,265
    @ $331.38 · 2024-06-17
    GRANGER ELDER
    Director
    $338,080
    @ $338.08 · 2024-06-12
    EDER NOELLE K
    Officer
    $3.73M
    @ $348.47 · 2024-05-14
    AGOGLIA HOELTZEL MARY T
    Officer
    $2.07M
    @ $348.71 · 2024-05-14
    CORDANI DAVID M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $14.15M
    @ $355.15 · 2024-03-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    CRM
    1
    Sells (3M)
    19
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $42.55M
    KROES NEELIE
    Director
    $929,276
    @ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
    HARRIS G PARKER
    Officer and Director
    $31.61M
    @ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $575,140
    @ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $590,102
    @ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $567,631
    @ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $550,430
    @ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $558,810
    @ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $536,322
    @ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $548,796
    @ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $1.10M
    @ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $547,344
    @ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $539,533
    @ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $555,001
    @ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $552,798
    @ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $545,384
    @ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $543,378
    @ $241.50 · 2025-09-04
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $572,842
    @ $254.60 · 2025-09-03
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $571,202
    @ $253.87 · 2025-08-28
    BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
    Chief Executive Officer
    $557,034
    @ $247.57 · 2025-08-25
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CI
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    CRM
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(37/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CI
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    CRM
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (37)
    View CI Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis
    The Cigna Group (CI) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) Stock Comparison | SafetyMargin.io