Compare StocksCHD vs MS

Church & Dwight Company, Inc. (CHD) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CHD is undervalued at $99, with a DCF intrinsic value of $15508168337 and a margin of safety of 100%. MS is undervalued at $210, with an intrinsic value of $269 and a margin of safety of 22%. Of the two, CHD has the wider margin of safety.

CHD
Church & Dwight Company, Inc.
$98.81
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$210.42

Rewards

CHD
  • Church & Dwight Company, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Church & Dwight Company, Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 15.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
MS
  • Gross margin of 87.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CHD
  • PEG ratio of 3.03 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Insiders have sold $3.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
MS
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $5.4M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CHD
MS
Valuation
$939.26M
Free Cash Flow
N/A
N/A
FCF Yield
N/A
31.67
Trailing P/E
17.01
24.48
Forward P/E
15.45
Quality & Moat
13.12%
ROIC
3.68%
17.04%
ROE
14.08%
45.56%
Gross Margin
87.64%
3.03
PEG Ratio
1.99
Balance Sheet Safety
0.50
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.60
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.24%
Dividend Yield
2.19%
CHD: 2Ties: 1MS: 6
CHDMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CHD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CHD
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.25B
Δ Market Cap
+$3.24
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CHD
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $98.81
Fair Value: $15508168337.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
21.9% Margin of Safety
Price is 21.9% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $210.42
Fair Value: $269.50
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CHD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $99?

-24.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -25.7%

The market implies -24.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -25.7%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CHD
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CHD
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CHD
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 94.1%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders1,475
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.1%Retail & Other 12.5%
No. of Institutional Holders3,329
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CHD
0
Buys (3M)
3
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $1.18M
DIERKER RICHARD A
Chief Executive Officer
$500,888
@ $91.57 · 2025-08-12
MCCHESNEY LEE B
Chief Financial Officer
$494,247
@ $91.37 · 2025-08-08
READ MICHAEL
Officer
$182,540
@ $91.27 · 2025-08-05
DIERKER RICHARD A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $93.91 · 2025-05-14
READ MICHAEL
Officer
$276,221
@ $92.07 · 2025-05-09
READ MICHAEL
Officer
$202,963
@ $106.82 · 2024-12-16
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $5,630
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CHD
4
Sells (3M)
6
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $5.42M
LINARES CARLOS G
Officer
$997,067
@ $99.71 · 2026-06-16
SHEARER ROBERT K
Director
$842,543
@ $97.97 · 2026-06-11
BUCHERT BRIAN D
Officer
$997,153
@ $98.14 · 2026-06-10
PRICE PENRY W
Director
$565,345
@ $94.86 · 2026-05-13
PRICE PENRY W
Director
$704,074
@ $100.58 · 2026-03-12
VERGIS JANET S
Director
$1.31M
@ $101.00 · 2026-02-04
HOOKER CARLEN G
Officer
$627,161
@ $98.30 · 2025-06-16
HOOKER CARLEN G
Officer
$1.17M
@ $98.75 · 2025-05-30
HOOKER CARLEN G
Officer
$294,158
@ $98.05 · 2025-05-29
PRICE PENRY W
Director
$1.37M
@ $93.13 · 2025-05-08
HEMSEY RENE
Officer
$1.22M
@ $109.98 · 2025-03-12
DE MAYNADIER PATRICK D
General Counsel
$6.32M
@ $115.98 · 2025-03-10
IRWIN BRADLEY C
Director
$265.00
@ $132.50 · 2024-12-10
SPANN RICK
Officer
$4.43M
@ $112.00 · 2024-12-02
LONGO JOSEPH JAMES
Officer
$874,789
@ $112.44 · 2024-11-22
DE MAYNADIER PATRICK D
General Counsel
$5.06M
@ $112.19 · 2024-11-21
IRWIN BRADLEY C
Director
$1.42M
@ $107.44 · 2024-11-12
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
2
Sells (3M)
14
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $64.71M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CHD
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(57/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CHD
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
MS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (57)
View CHD Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CHD vs MS

Is Church & Dwight Company, Inc. or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CHD trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $15508168337 vs. price $99), compared to MS's 21.9% margin of safety (intrinsic $269 vs. $210).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Church & Dwight Company, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

CHD scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CHD scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Church & Dwight Company, Inc. or Morgan Stanley?

CHD earns 13.1% ROIC versus MS's 3.7%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Church & Dwight Company, Inc.'s or Morgan Stanley's?

CHD's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). CHD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.