Compare Stocks › CHD vs GS

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CHD is overvalued at $107, with a DCF intrinsic value of $68 and a margin of safety of -58%. GS is undervalued at $895, with an intrinsic value of $1584 and a margin of safety of 44%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
$107.23
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$894.55

Rewards

CHD
  • ★Church & Dwight Co., Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • ★Church & Dwight Co., Inc. scores 94/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 15.7% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
GS
  • ★Gross margin of 81.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CHD
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 3.01 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $5.5M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
GS
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠5 insider sales totaling $12.2M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CHD
GS
Valuation
$1.09B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
4.32%
FCF Yield
N/A
32.89
Trailing P/E
12.86
26.58
Forward P/E
12.07
Quality & Moat
13.70%
ROIC
2.23%
17.80%
ROE
17.75%
45.97%
Gross Margin
81.29%
3.01
PEG Ratio
1.12
Balance Sheet Safety
0.39
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.26
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.15%
Dividend Yield
2.24%
CHD: 1Ties: 2GS: 6
CHDGS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CHD

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CHD
$0.14
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$1.25B
Δ Market Cap
+$174.6M
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CHD
58.1% Overvalued
Price is 58.1% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $107.23
Fair Value: $67.81
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GS
43.5% Margin of Safety
Price is 43.5% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $894.55
Fair Value: $1584.20
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CHD

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $107?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +10.6%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +10.6%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CHD
94/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CHD
-2.69
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CHD
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 97.5%Retail & Other 2.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,475
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GS
Insiders 0.6%Institutions 75.7%Retail & Other 23.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,978
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CHD
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
DIERKER RICHARD A
Chief Executive Officer
$500,888
@ $91.57 · 2025-08-12
MCCHESNEY LEE B
Chief Financial Officer
$494,247
@ $91.37 · 2025-08-08
READ MICHAEL
Officer
$182,540
@ $91.27 · 2025-08-05
DIERKER RICHARD A
Chief Executive Officer
$1.25M
@ $93.91 · 2025-05-14
READ MICHAEL
Officer
$276,221
@ $92.07 · 2025-05-09
READ MICHAEL
Officer
$202,963
@ $106.82 · 2024-12-16
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CHD
5
Sells (3M)
11
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.88M
LINARES CARLOS G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.58M
@ $103.00 · 2026-08-26
HEMSEY RENE
Officer
$511,275
@ $102.25 · 2026-08-25
LINARES CARLOS G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.57M
@ $102.00 · 2026-08-24
IRWIN BRADLEY C
Director
$441,575
@ $102.69 · 2026-08-11
WINKLEBLACK ARTHUR B
Director
$1.36M
@ $102.83 · 2026-08-05
LINARES CARLOS G
Officer
$997,067
@ $99.71 · 2026-06-16
SHEARER ROBERT K
Director
$842,543
@ $97.97 · 2026-06-11
BUCHERT BRIAN D
Officer
$997,153
@ $98.14 · 2026-06-10
PRICE PENRY W
Director
$565,345
@ $94.86 · 2026-05-13
PRICE PENRY W
Director
$704,074
@ $100.58 · 2026-03-12
VERGIS JANET S
Director
$1.31M
@ $101.00 · 2026-02-04
HOOKER CARLEN G
Officer
$627,161
@ $98.30 · 2025-06-16
HOOKER CARLEN G
Officer
$1.17M
@ $98.75 · 2025-05-30
HOOKER CARLEN G
Officer
$294,158
@ $98.05 · 2025-05-29
PRICE PENRY W
Director
$1.37M
@ $93.13 · 2025-05-08
HEMSEY RENE
Officer
$1.22M
@ $109.98 · 2025-03-12
DE MAYNADIER PATRICK D
General Counsel
$6.32M
@ $115.98 · 2025-03-10
IRWIN BRADLEY C
Director
$265.00
@ $132.50 · 2024-12-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GS
5
Sells (3M)
19
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $76.92M
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$229,305
@ $917.22 · 2026-10-28
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$10.93M
@ $910.72 · 2026-10-27
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$222,562
@ $890.25 · 2026-10-22
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$620,280
@ $1033.80 · 2026-08-28
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$184,445
@ $1053.97 · 2026-08-04
LESLIE ERICKA T
Officer
$287,951
@ $1151.80 · 2026-07-15
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CHD
FearGreed
😏Greed(67/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(48/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CHD
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (67)
GS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
View CHD Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CHD vs GS

Is Church & Dwight Co., Inc. or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 43.5% margin of safety (intrinsic value $1584 vs. price $895), compared to CHD's -58.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $68 vs. $107).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?▼

CHD scores 94/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?▼

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CHD scores 4.6 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?▼

CHD earns 13.7% ROIC versus GS's 2.2%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Church & Dwight Co., Inc.'s or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s?▼

CHD's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). CHD has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CHD vs GS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io