Compare StocksCDNS vs UNH

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CDNS is overvalued at $387, with a DCF intrinsic value of $164 and a margin of safety of -137%. UNH is fairly valued at $401, with an intrinsic value of $376 and a margin of safety of -7%. Of the two, UNH has the wider margin of safety.

CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
$387.39
VS
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
$400.96

Rewards

CDNS
  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Gross margin of 86.1% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc. scores 91/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
UNH
  • UnitedHealth Group Incorporated scores 73/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CDNS
  • FCF yield of 1.4% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
  • Trailing P/E of 89.9x is 30% above the historical average of 68.9x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • PEG ratio of 3.68 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
UNH
  • ROIC has declined by 6.9 percentage points over the past 4 years, which may signal competitive erosion.
  • Gross margin of 18.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 11.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CDNS
UNH
Valuation
$1.50B
Free Cash Flow
$17.69B
1.40%
FCF Yield
4.86%
89.88
Trailing P/E
30.17
41.28
Forward P/E
19.18
Quality & Moat
13.45%
ROIC
15.60%
20.66%
ROE
12.18%
86.08%
Gross Margin
18.80%
3.68
PEG Ratio
1.41
Balance Sheet Safety
0.23
Net Debt / Equity
0.44
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
0.76
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.18
0.00%
Dividend Yield
2.21%
CDNS: 4Ties: 1UNH: 7
CDNSUNH

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CDNS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

UNH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CDNS
$12.84
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.21B
Δ Market Cap
+$41.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
UNH
$-7.37
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$26.63B
Δ Market Cap
$-196.16B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CDNS
136.5% Overvalued
Price is 136.5% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $387.39
Fair Value: $163.79
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
UNH
6.6% Overvalued
Price is 6.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $400.96
Fair Value: $376.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CDNS

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $387?

+28.4%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +25.3%

The market implies +28.4% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +25.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

UNH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $401?

+14.1%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +9.8%

The market implies +14.1% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +9.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CDNS
91/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Revenue Predictability is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
UNH
73/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CDNS
-2.52
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
UNH
-2.45
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CDNS
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.1%Retail & Other 8.6%
No. of Institutional Holders2,087
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
UNH
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 85.9%Retail & Other 13.8%
No. of Institutional Holders4,020
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CDNS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
GAVRIELOV MOSHE NACHUM
Director
$13,875
@ $256.94 · 2025-03-28
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
UNH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HEMSLEY STEPHEN J
Chief Executive Officer
$25.02M
@ $288.57 · 2025-05-16
REX JOHN F
President
$5.00M
@ $291.12 · 2025-05-16
GIL KRISTEN
Director
$1.00M
@ $271.17 · 2025-05-15
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$491,786
@ $320.80 · 2025-05-14
NOSEWORTHY JOHN H
Director
$93,647
@ $312.16 · 2025-05-14
FLYNN TIMOTHY PATRICK
Director
$511,575
@ $511.57 · 2025-01-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CDNS
12
Sells (3M)
35
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $104.64M
BRENNAN ITA M
Director
$69,740
@ $387.44 · 2026-06-10
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$30.85M
@ $401.51 · 2026-06-02
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$2.79M
@ $393.91 · 2026-06-01
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$1.66M
@ $369.35 · 2026-05-22
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$19.20M
@ $370.00 · 2026-05-22
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$369,559
@ $345.06 · 2026-05-18
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$369,559
@ $345.06 · 2026-05-18
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.74M
@ $348.71 · 2026-05-05
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$337,490
@ $337.49 · 2026-05-01
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$3.56M
@ $339.00 · 2026-05-01
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$6.65M
@ $309.45 · 2026-04-16
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$280,190
@ $280.19 · 2026-04-01
BRENNAN ITA M
Director
$53,105
@ $295.03 · 2026-03-17
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$297,780
@ $297.78 · 2026-03-02
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$295,090
@ $295.09 · 2026-02-02
GAVRIELOV MOSHE NACHUM
Director
$7,898
@ $315.92 · 2026-01-21
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.01M
@ $317.96 · 2026-01-08
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$315,700
@ $315.70 · 2026-01-02
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$8.86M
@ $318.57 · 2025-12-16
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$1.86M
@ $339.43 · 2025-12-10
BRENNAN ITA M
Director
$60,747
@ $337.48 · 2025-12-10
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.02M
@ $337.99 · 2025-12-08
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$6.80M
@ $340.00 · 2025-12-05
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$312,640
@ $312.64 · 2025-12-01
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$1.88M
@ $324.94 · 2025-11-06
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$1.82M
@ $327.80 · 2025-11-05
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$340,260
@ $340.26 · 2025-11-03
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$348,270
@ $348.27 · 2025-10-01
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$2.62M
@ $349.16 · 2025-09-30
BRENNAN ITA M
Director
$60,213
@ $334.52 · 2025-09-10
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$343,950
@ $343.95 · 2025-09-02
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.94M
@ $350.10 · 2025-08-18
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$358,720
@ $358.72 · 2025-08-01
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.84M
@ $312.69 · 2025-07-17
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$306,350
@ $306.35 · 2025-07-01
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.68M
@ $300.92 · 2025-06-17
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$302,000
@ $302.00 · 2025-06-13
BRENNAN ITA M
Director
$54,720
@ $304.00 · 2025-06-10
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$185,880
@ $285.97 · 2025-06-02
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$3.33M
@ $310.00 · 2025-05-02
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$196,950
@ $303.00 · 2025-05-01
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$1.41M
@ $300.00 · 2025-04-29
BRENNAN ITA M
Director
$49,500
@ $275.00 · 2025-04-24
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$164,216
@ $252.64 · 2025-04-01
NISEWANER KARNA
General Counsel
$455,562
@ $246.25 · 2025-03-17
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$164,274
@ $252.73 · 2025-03-03
NISEWANER KARNA
General Counsel
$169,073
@ $296.10 · 2025-02-18
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$3.88M
@ $303.94 · 2025-02-10
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$190,008
@ $292.32 · 2025-02-03
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$28.88M
@ $310.00 · 2025-01-06
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$3.75M
@ $299.85 · 2025-01-03
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$198,146
@ $304.84 · 2025-01-02
DEVGAN ANIRUDH
Chief Executive Officer
$1.80M
@ $304.04 · 2025-01-02
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$1.31M
@ $309.03 · 2024-12-18
SCANNELL PAUL
Officer
$969,628
@ $305.78 · 2024-12-13
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$199,024
@ $306.19 · 2024-12-02
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$1.79M
@ $310.17 · 2024-11-22
SANGIOVANNI VINCENTELLI ALBERTO
Director
$447,675
@ $298.45 · 2024-11-15
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.96M
@ $295.60 · 2024-11-15
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$179,400
@ $276.00 · 2024-11-01
SANGIOVANNI VINCENTELLI ALBERTO
Director
$425,490
@ $283.66 · 2024-10-15
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$6,589
@ $263.56 · 2024-10-08
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$177,736
@ $273.44 · 2024-10-01
NISEWANER KARNA
General Counsel
$181,871
@ $275.98 · 2024-09-17
SANGIOVANNI VINCENTELLI ALBERTO
Director
$413,970
@ $275.98 · 2024-09-17
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$173,478
@ $266.89 · 2024-09-03
WALL JOHN M
Chief Financial Officer
$2.66M
@ $265.91 · 2024-08-28
NISEWANER KARNA
General Counsel
$339,021
@ $279.49 · 2024-08-16
SANGIOVANNI VINCENTELLI ALBERTO
Director
$414,360
@ $276.24 · 2024-08-15
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$2.76M
@ $276.36 · 2024-08-15
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$173,056
@ $266.24 · 2024-08-01
SANGIOVANNI VINCENTELLI ALBERTO
Director
$471,855
@ $314.57 · 2024-07-15
NISEWANER KARNA
General Counsel
$184,650
@ $307.75 · 2024-07-01
CUNNINGHAM PAUL ALEXANDER
Officer
$200,038
@ $307.75 · 2024-07-01
TENG CHIN-CHI
Officer
$3.06M
@ $305.84 · 2024-07-01
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
UNH
1
Sells (3M)
1
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $284,000
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Officer
$284,000
@ $355.00 · 2026-04-23
CONWAY PATRICK HUGH M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
$179,645
@ $305.00 · 2025-06-10
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CDNS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
UNH
FearGreed
😏Greed(68/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CDNS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
UNH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (68)
View CDNS Full AnalysisView UNH Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CDNS vs UNH

Is Cadence Design Systems, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, UNH trades at a -6.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $376 vs. price $401), compared to CDNS's -136.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $164 vs. $387).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

CDNS scores 91/100 (Wide moat), while UNH scores 73/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is UnitedHealth Group Incorporated in financial distress?

UNH's Altman Z-Score of 2.9 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CDNS scores 13.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) generates a 4.9% free cash flow yield, compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s 1.4%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. or UnitedHealth Group Incorporated?

UNH earns 15.6% ROIC versus CDNS's 13.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.