Compare StocksCBRE vs INTU

CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) vs Intuit Inc. (INTU): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-21, CBRE is fairly valued at $132, with a DCF intrinsic value of $145 and a margin of safety of 9%. INTU is undervalued at $267, with an intrinsic value of $534 and a margin of safety of 50%. Of the two, INTU has the wider margin of safety.

CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
$131.55
VS
INTU
Intuit Inc.
$267.00

Rewards

CBRE
  • PEG ratio of 0.70 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to its growth rate — paying less than 1x for each unit of earnings growth.
INTU
  • Gross margin of 80.8% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Intuit Inc. scores 79/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 18.5% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.

Risks

CBRE
  • Gross margin of 18.5% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
  • FCF yield of 2.8% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.
INTU
  • FCF yield of 7.2% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CBRE
INTU
Valuation
$1.09B
Free Cash Flow
$5.23B
2.84%
FCF Yield
7.16%
30.03
Trailing P/E
16.29
14.84
Forward P/E
9.77
Quality & Moat
4.44%
ROIC
28.21%
15.60%
ROE
22.50%
18.50%
Gross Margin
80.79%
0.70
PEG Ratio
0.69
Balance Sheet Safety
0.96
Net Debt / Equity
0.01
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
4.05
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.02
0.00%
Dividend Yield
1.80%
CBRE: 0Ties: 2INTU: 10
CBREINTU

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CBRE

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTU

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CBRE
$7.59
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$3.11B
Δ Market Cap
+$23.62B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTU
$12.31
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$6.10B
Δ Market Cap
+$75.17B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CBRE
9.1% Margin of Safety
Price is 9.1% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $131.55
Fair Value: $144.76
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTU
50.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 50.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $267.00
Fair Value: $533.98
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CBRE

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $132?

+13.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +18.2%

The market implies +13.8% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +18.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

INTU

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $267?

+4.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CBRE
55/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
INTU
79/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. ROIC Consistency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CBRE
-2.49
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTU
-2.65
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CBRE
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 100.1%
No. of Institutional Holders1,537
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTU
Insiders 2.4%Institutions 92.6%Retail & Other 5.1%
No. of Institutional Holders2,817
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CBRE
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
MUNOZ OSCAR X
Director
$242,109
@ $115.29 · 2024-08-29
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTU
1
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $541,665
PRABHU VASANT M.
Director
$541,665
@ $309.52 · 2026-05-26
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CBRE
2
Sells (3M)
7
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $2.38M
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$294,165
@ $130.74 · 2026-05-15
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$15,017
@ $140.35 · 2026-05-05
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$77,970
@ $132.83 · 2026-03-12
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$1.37M
@ $148.61 · 2026-02-26
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$152,410
@ $152.41 · 2025-11-10
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$315,200
@ $157.60 · 2025-08-13
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$154,900
@ $154.90 · 2025-08-11
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$254,585
@ $129.10 · 2025-05-19
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$79,015
@ $126.02 · 2025-05-05
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$251,380
@ $125.69 · 2025-03-17
DOELLINGER CHAD J
Officer
$115,603
@ $126.62 · 2025-03-12
QUEENAN DANIEL G
Officer
$1.40M
@ $140.12 · 2024-12-02
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$238,382
@ $131.34 · 2024-11-15
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$142,024
@ $135.39 · 2024-11-13
JENNY CHRISTOPHER T
Director
$1.14M
@ $135.53 · 2024-11-12
QUEENAN DANIEL G
Officer
$1.15M
@ $114.67 · 2024-09-03
JENNY CHRISTOPHER T
Director
$1.21M
@ $112.00 · 2024-08-20
GIAMARTINO EMMA E
Chief Financial Officer
$360,535
@ $108.89 · 2024-08-12
KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
Chief Operating Officer
$116,948
@ $108.89 · 2024-08-12
CAPLAN LINDSEY S
Officer
$219,746
@ $109.87 · 2024-07-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTU
2
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $11.55M
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$80,145
@ $282.20 · 2026-06-16
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$289,448
@ $288.29 · 2026-06-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$457,046
@ $457.50 · 2026-03-12
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$840,097
@ $629.76 · 2026-01-05
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$741,172
@ $675.02 · 2025-12-19
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$219,763
@ $659.95 · 2025-12-11
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$435,354
@ $653.68 · 2025-12-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$792,160
@ $677.06 · 2025-10-03
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$665,951
@ $666.62 · 2025-09-11
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$27,930
@ $665.00 · 2025-08-25
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$255,887
@ $768.43 · 2025-07-10
DALZELL RICHARD L
Director
$521,891
@ $783.62 · 2025-07-09
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$689,400
@ $782.52 · 2025-07-08
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$2.03M
@ $782.22 · 2025-07-03
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$1.25M
@ $773.90 · 2025-07-02
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$887,583
@ $774.51 · 2025-07-02
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$1.36M
@ $784.24 · 2025-06-27
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$1.12M
@ $771.24 · 2025-06-05
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$26.12M
@ $760.84 · 2025-06-03
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$19.29M
@ $752.25 · 2025-05-29
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$30.46M
@ $738.61 · 2025-05-28
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$11.66M
@ $726.15 · 2025-05-27
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$340,143
@ $725.25 · 2025-05-27
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$12.18M
@ $729.16 · 2025-05-27
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.00M
@ $612.45 · 2025-03-24
TESSEL MARIANNA
Officer
$4.43M
@ $600.13 · 2025-03-21
BURTON EVE B
Director
$1.02M
@ $600.00 · 2025-03-20
HOTZ LAUREN DALE
Officer
$667,838
@ $619.52 · 2025-01-10
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$814,350
@ $626.42 · 2025-01-08
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$2.94M
@ $613.70 · 2025-01-07
AUJLA SANDEEP S
Chief Financial Officer
$68,506
@ $628.50 · 2025-01-03
NOTARAINNI MARK PHILLIP
Officer
$228,121
@ $630.17 · 2025-01-03
BALAZS ALEX G
Chief Technology Officer
$15.86M
@ $665.98 · 2024-12-12
FENNELL LAURA A
Officer
$5.06M
@ $657.64 · 2024-12-10
MCLEAN KERRY JEAN
General Counsel
$11.16M
@ $650.78 · 2024-12-09
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CBRE
FearGreed
😐Neutral(46/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTU
FearGreed
😨Fear(25/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CBRE
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (46)
INTU
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (25)
View CBRE Full AnalysisView INTU Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CBRE vs INTU

Is CBRE Group, Inc. or Intuit Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, INTU trades at a 50.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $534 vs. price $267), compared to CBRE's 9.1% margin of safety (intrinsic $145 vs. $132).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, CBRE Group, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

INTU scores 79/100 (Wide moat), while CBRE scores 55/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Which company has better free cash flow, CBRE Group, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

Intuit Inc. (INTU) generates a 7.2% free cash flow yield, compared to CBRE Group, Inc.'s 2.8%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, CBRE Group, Inc. or Intuit Inc.?

INTU earns 28.2% ROIC versus CBRE's 4.4%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.