Compare StocksCBRE vs INTC

CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
$133.21
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$46.18

Rewards

CBRE
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $7.59 of market value — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
INTC

    Risks

    CBRE
    • Gross margin of 18.7% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Buybacks have been poorly timed — 3 out of 4 years involved repurchases at relatively expensive valuations.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    INTC
    Valuation
    $-84.25M
    Free Cash Flow
    $-4.50B
    -0.21%
    FCF Yield
    -1.95%
    34.60
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    15.31
    Forward P/E
    46.59
    Quality & Moat
    0.19%
    ROIC
    1.24%
    12.02%
    ROE
    -0.21%
    18.66%
    Gross Margin
    36.56%
    N/A
    PEG Ratio
    N/A
    Balance Sheet Safety
    1.06
    Debt / Equity
    0.37
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    3.76
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.77
    N/A
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    CBRE: 4Ties: 1INTC: 4
    CBREINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CBRE

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    $7.59
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $3.11B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$23.62B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    26.6% Overvalued
    Price is 26.6% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $133.21
    Fair Value: $105.20
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $46.18
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CBRE

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    55/100
    Narrow Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    -2.49
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    Insiders 0.6%Institutions 99.1%Retail & Other 0.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,547
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 4.4%Institutions 62.0%Retail & Other 33.6%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,156
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    MUNOZ OSCAR X
    Director
    $242,109
    @ $115.29 · 2024-08-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    1
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $124,173
    @ $30.29 · 2024-05-01
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $125,674
    @ $31.42 · 2024-04-29
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    2
    Sells (3M)
    7
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $2.40M
    DOELLINGER CHAD J
    Officer
    $77,970
    @ $132.83 · 2026-03-12
    GIAMARTINO EMMA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $1.37M
    @ $148.61 · 2026-02-26
    KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $152,410
    @ $152.41 · 2025-11-10
    GIAMARTINO EMMA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $315,200
    @ $157.60 · 2025-08-13
    KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $154,900
    @ $154.90 · 2025-08-11
    GIAMARTINO EMMA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $254,585
    @ $129.10 · 2025-05-19
    DOELLINGER CHAD J
    Officer
    $79,015
    @ $126.02 · 2025-05-05
    GIAMARTINO EMMA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $251,380
    @ $125.69 · 2025-03-17
    DOELLINGER CHAD J
    Officer
    $115,603
    @ $126.62 · 2025-03-12
    QUEENAN DANIEL G
    Officer
    $1.40M
    @ $140.12 · 2024-12-02
    GIAMARTINO EMMA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $238,382
    @ $131.34 · 2024-11-15
    KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $142,024
    @ $135.39 · 2024-11-13
    JENNY CHRISTOPHER T
    Director
    $1.14M
    @ $135.53 · 2024-11-12
    QUEENAN DANIEL G
    Officer
    $1.15M
    @ $114.67 · 2024-09-03
    JENNY CHRISTOPHER T
    Director
    $1.21M
    @ $112.00 · 2024-08-20
    GIAMARTINO EMMA E
    Chief Financial Officer
    $360,535
    @ $108.89 · 2024-08-12
    KOHLI VIKRAMADITYA
    Chief Operating Officer
    $116,948
    @ $108.89 · 2024-08-12
    CAPLAN LINDSEY S
    Officer
    $219,746
    @ $109.87 · 2024-07-26
    QUEENAN DANIEL G
    Officer
    $886,400
    @ $88.64 · 2024-06-03
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    1
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    FearGreed
    😨Fear(36/100)

    "Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(53/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CBRE
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (36)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (53)
    View CBRE Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis