Compare Stocks › CB vs MS

Chubb Limited (CB) vs Morgan Stanley (MS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CB is fairly valued at $364, with a DCF intrinsic value of $366 and a margin of safety of 1%. MS is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $314 and a margin of safety of 41%. Of the two, MS has the wider margin of safety.

CB
Chubb Limited
$364.12
VS
MS
Morgan Stanley
$184.30

Rewards

CB
  • ★Chubb Limited scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.32 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • ★FCF yield of 8.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
MS
  • ★Gross margin of 87.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • ★Morgan Stanley scores 80/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Each dollar of retained earnings has created $3.56 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CB
  • ⚠PEG ratio of 2.74 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.96 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠Insiders have sold $6.7M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
MS
  • ⚠Altman Z-Score of 0.29 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • ⚠13 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CB
MS
Valuation
$11.23B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
8.08%
FCF Yield
N/A
12.76
Trailing P/E
14.62
12.36
Forward P/E
13.50
Quality & Moat
9.62%
ROIC
3.47%
14.25%
ROE
13.84%
29.80%
Gross Margin
87.31%
2.74
PEG Ratio
1.61
Balance Sheet Safety
0.23
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.27
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
1.12%
Dividend Yield
2.50%
CB: 3Ties: 2MS: 4
CBMS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

MS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CB
$1.26
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$24.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$30.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
MS
$6.65
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$20.84B
Δ Market Cap
+$138.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CB
0.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 0.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $364.12
Fair Value: $366.48
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
MS
41.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 41.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.30
Fair Value: $313.71
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $364?

+4.0%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.8%

The market implies +4.0% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.8%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

MS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CB
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
MS
80/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CB
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
MS
-2.09
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CB
Insiders 9.5%Institutions 85.0%Retail & Other 5.5%
No. of Institutional Holders2,790
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
MS
Insiders 24.4%Institutions 63.5%Retail & Other 12.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,458
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CORBAT MICHAEL L
Director
$114,665
@ $269.80 · 2025-07-25
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$2.87M
@ $293.01 · 2025-06-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
MS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
PETERSON DOUGLAS L
Director
$5,630
@ $156.39 · 2025-10-17
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CB
2
Sells (3M)
18
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51.70M
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Chief Investment Officer
$4.85M
@ $356.77 · 2026-10-26
CONNORS MICHAEL P
Director
$1.90M
@ $345.00 · 2026-08-21
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$3.10M
@ $364.54 · 2026-07-28
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.25M
@ $322.08 · 2026-06-08
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$7.39M
@ $321.51 · 2026-05-27
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$190,468
@ $329.53 · 2026-05-21
STEIMER OLIVIER
Director
$658,600
@ $329.30 · 2026-03-19
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$250,408
@ $325.21 · 2026-03-06
JOHNS BRYCE L
Officer
$504,925
@ $336.62 · 2026-03-04
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$2.57M
@ $336.44 · 2026-03-03
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$1.67M
@ $325.43 · 2026-02-13
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$5.00M
@ $335.09 · 2026-02-12
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Chief Investment Officer
$9.23M
@ $331.98 · 2026-02-06
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$4.99M
@ $331.47 · 2026-02-05
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.29M
@ $295.04 · 2025-12-02
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$253,666
@ $293.59 · 2025-12-02
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$4.85M
@ $296.45 · 2025-11-14
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.73M
@ $297.08 · 2025-11-13
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$6.66M
@ $281.00 · 2025-10-27
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$1.60M
@ $290.06 · 2025-07-01
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$154,707
@ $287.56 · 2025-06-16
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.54M
@ $293.16 · 2025-06-04
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$24.69M
@ $290.24 · 2025-05-21
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.90M
@ $292.13 · 2025-05-20
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$3.61M
@ $294.82 · 2025-03-20
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Officer
$4.37M
@ $296.12 · 2025-03-18
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$221,583
@ $290.41 · 2025-03-14
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$2.87M
@ $286.96 · 2025-03-04
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$269,503
@ $267.63 · 2025-02-11
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
MS
0
Sells (3M)
13
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $48.28M
SCHAPIRO MARY L
Director
$212,055
@ $212.06 · 2026-07-28
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$5.21M
@ $215.55 · 2026-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$2.12M
@ $190.75 · 2026-04-20
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$2.78M
@ $189.24 · 2026-04-17
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$3.04M
@ $188.22 · 2026-04-16
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$9.74M
@ $188.59 · 2026-04-16
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$6.02M
@ $182.61 · 2026-01-30
YESHAYA SHARON
Chief Financial Officer
$2.94M
@ $185.77 · 2026-01-20
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$1.55M
@ $182.08 · 2026-01-20
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$3.97M
@ $184.00 · 2026-01-20
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.44M
@ $183.45 · 2026-01-20
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$3.69M
@ $184.55 · 2026-01-20
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$5.57M
@ $183.62 · 2026-01-20
PICK EDWARD N.
Chief Executive Officer
$16.43M
@ $164.34 · 2025-10-31
SMITH CHARLES AUBREY III
Officer
$2.81M
@ $140.30 · 2025-07-17
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.69M
@ $141.12 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$4.09M
@ $141.13 · 2025-07-17
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.53M
@ $140.62 · 2025-07-17
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$3.70M
@ $127.37 · 2025-05-12
HERZ ROBERT H
Director
$95,459
@ $119.32 · 2025-05-02
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.80M
@ $120.00 · 2025-05-02
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.12M
@ $111.65 · 2025-04-15
CRAWLEY MANDELL L.
Officer
$1.15M
@ $138.06 · 2025-01-22
GROSSMAN ERIC F
Officer
$1.78M
@ $136.20 · 2025-01-21
SIMKOWITZ DANIEL A
President
$5.00M
@ $136.61 · 2025-01-21
AKRAM RAJA
Chief Financial Officer
$2.38M
@ $136.01 · 2025-01-21
PIZZI MICHAEL A
Officer
$2.52M
@ $136.92 · 2025-01-21
SAPERSTEIN ANDREW MICHAEL
President
$4.20M
@ $136.43 · 2025-01-21
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CB
FearGreed
😏Greed(72/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
MS
FearGreed
😐Neutral(49/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CB
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (72)
MS
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (49)
View CB Full AnalysisView MS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CB vs MS

Is Chubb Limited or Morgan Stanley more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, MS trades at a 41.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $314 vs. price $184), compared to CB's 0.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $366 vs. $364).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chubb Limited or Morgan Stanley?▼

CB scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while MS scores 80/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Morgan Stanley in financial distress?▼

MS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CB scores 1.0 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chubb Limited or Morgan Stanley?▼

CB earns 9.6% ROIC versus MS's 3.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Chubb Limited's or Morgan Stanley's?▼

CB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to MS's 79/100 (Safe). CB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

CB vs MS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io