Compare StocksCB vs GOOGL

Chubb Limited (CB) vs Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CB is undervalued at $323, with a DCF intrinsic value of $533 and a margin of safety of 39%. GOOGL is overvalued at $368, with an intrinsic value of $94 and a margin of safety of -290%. Of the two, CB has the wider margin of safety.

CB
Chubb Limited
$323.40
VS
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
$368.03

Rewards

CB
  • Chubb Limited scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.32 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • FCF yield of 10.1% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.
GOOGL
  • Alphabet Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Gross margin of 60.4% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Alphabet Inc. scores 89/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.

Risks

CB
  • PEG ratio of 2.89 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.96 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • Insiders have sold $8.8M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
GOOGL
  • FCF yield of 1.6% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CB
GOOGL
Valuation
$12.62B
Free Cash Flow
$73.27B
10.06%
FCF Yield
1.63%
11.44
Trailing P/E
28.09
11.06
Forward P/E
25.39
Quality & Moat
9.47%
ROIC
20.98%
15.43%
ROE
38.88%
31.00%
Gross Margin
60.37%
2.89
PEG Ratio
1.47
Balance Sheet Safety
0.22
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.22
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.19
1.24%
Dividend Yield
0.24%
CB: 4Ties: 1GOOGL: 7
CBGOOGL

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GOOGL

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CB
$1.26
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$24.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$30.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GOOGL
$9.18
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$288.67B
Δ Market Cap
+$2.65T
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CB
39.4% Margin of Safety
Price is 39.4% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $323.40
Fair Value: $533.31
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GOOGL
289.6% Overvalued
Price is 289.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $368.03
Fair Value: $94.46
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $323?

+2.7%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -0.1%

The market implies +2.7% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -0.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

GOOGL

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $368?

+22.9%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CB
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GOOGL
89/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by roic consistency. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CB
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GOOGL
-2.92
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CB
Insiders 9.4%Institutions 84.9%Retail & Other 5.7%
No. of Institutional Holders2,726
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GOOGL
Insiders 1.2%Institutions 80.8%Retail & Other 18.1%
No. of Institutional Holders7,263
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CB
0
Buys (3M)
1
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $114,665
CORBAT MICHAEL L
Director
$114,665
@ $269.80 · 2025-07-25
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$2.87M
@ $293.01 · 2025-06-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GOOGL
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CB
3
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $50.11M
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.25M
@ $322.08 · 2026-06-08
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$7.39M
@ $321.51 · 2026-05-27
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$190,468
@ $329.53 · 2026-05-21
STEIMER OLIVIER
Director
$658,600
@ $329.30 · 2026-03-19
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$250,408
@ $325.21 · 2026-03-06
JOHNS BRYCE L
Officer
$504,925
@ $336.62 · 2026-03-04
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$2.57M
@ $336.44 · 2026-03-03
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$1.67M
@ $325.43 · 2026-02-13
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$5.00M
@ $335.09 · 2026-02-12
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Chief Investment Officer
$9.23M
@ $331.98 · 2026-02-06
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$4.99M
@ $331.47 · 2026-02-05
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.29M
@ $295.04 · 2025-12-02
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$253,666
@ $293.59 · 2025-12-02
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$4.85M
@ $296.45 · 2025-11-14
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.73M
@ $297.08 · 2025-11-13
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$6.66M
@ $281.00 · 2025-10-27
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$1.60M
@ $290.06 · 2025-07-01
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$154,707
@ $287.56 · 2025-06-16
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.54M
@ $293.16 · 2025-06-04
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$24.69M
@ $290.24 · 2025-05-21
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.90M
@ $292.13 · 2025-05-20
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$3.61M
@ $294.82 · 2025-03-20
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Officer
$4.37M
@ $296.12 · 2025-03-18
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$221,583
@ $290.41 · 2025-03-14
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$2.87M
@ $286.96 · 2025-03-04
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$269,503
@ $267.63 · 2025-02-11
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.55M
@ $288.42 · 2024-09-09
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.89M
@ $287.07 · 2024-09-05
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$75,035
@ $287.49 · 2024-09-03
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$4.28M
@ $285.49 · 2024-09-03
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.07M
@ $273.06 · 2024-08-20
ENNS PETER C
Chief Financial Officer
$2.18M
@ $266.06 · 2024-06-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GOOGL
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
No open market insider sales found.
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CB
FearGreed
😏Greed(65/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GOOGL
FearGreed
😐Neutral(58/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (65)
GOOGL
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (58)
View CB Full AnalysisView GOOGL Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CB vs GOOGL

Is Chubb Limited or Alphabet Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CB trades at a 39.4% margin of safety (intrinsic value $533 vs. price $323), compared to GOOGL's -289.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $94 vs. $368).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chubb Limited or Alphabet Inc.?

CB scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while GOOGL scores 89/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Chubb Limited in financial distress?

CB's Altman Z-Score of 1.0 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. GOOGL scores 2.4 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Chubb Limited or Alphabet Inc.?

Chubb Limited (CB) generates a 10.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Alphabet Inc.'s 1.6%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chubb Limited or Alphabet Inc.?

GOOGL earns 21.0% ROIC versus CB's 9.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Chubb Limited's or Alphabet Inc.'s?

CB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to GOOGL's 88/100 (Very Safe). CB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.