Compare StocksCB vs CRM

Chubb Limited (CB) vs Salesforce, Inc. (CRM): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CB is undervalued at $351, with a DCF intrinsic value of $453 and a margin of safety of 23%. CRM is undervalued at $184, with an intrinsic value of $222981480055 and a margin of safety of 100%. Of the two, CRM has the wider margin of safety.

CB
Chubb Limited
$350.68
VS
CRM
Salesforce, Inc.
$184.02

Rewards

CB
  • Chubb Limited scores 100/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.32 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
CRM
  • Gross margin of 77.6% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 31.6% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $5.53 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CB
  • FCF yield of 7.8% suggests reasonable valuation assuming continued moderate growth.
  • PEG ratio of 2.77 indicates the stock is expensive relative to its expected growth — the market may be pricing in more growth than analysts project.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.96 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
CRM
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.81 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CB
CRM
Valuation
$10.49B
Free Cash Flow
$16.55B
7.75%
FCF Yield
N/A
12.42
Trailing P/E
21.32
12.03
Forward P/E
11.86
Quality & Moat
10.87%
ROIC
9.61%
14.82%
ROE
16.91%
31.13%
Gross Margin
77.64%
2.77
PEG Ratio
0.76
Balance Sheet Safety
0.21
Net Debt / Equity
0.90
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.15
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.38
1.16%
Dividend Yield
0.96%
CB: 5Ties: 2CRM: 4
CBCRM

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CB

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

CRM

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CB
$1.26
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$24.27B
Δ Market Cap
+$30.61B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
CRM
$-0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$14.67B
Δ Market Cap
$-79.12
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CB
22.6% Margin of Safety
Price is 22.6% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $350.68
Fair Value: $453.06
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
CRM
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $184.02
Fair Value: $222981480055.14
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CB

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $351?

+3.6%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +3.3%

The market implies +3.6% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +3.3%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

CRM

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $184?

-21.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -30.0%

The market implies -21.2% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -30.0%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CB
100/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Reinvestment Efficiency is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
CRM
58/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with revenue predictability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CB
-2.47
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
CRM
-2.73
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CB
Insiders 9.5%Institutions 85.1%Retail & Other 5.4%
No. of Institutional Holders2,718
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
CRM
Insiders 3.0%Institutions 93.8%Retail & Other 3.2%
No. of Institutional Holders3,568
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CB
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
CORBAT MICHAEL L
Director
$114,665
@ $269.80 · 2025-07-25
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$2.87M
@ $293.01 · 2025-06-06
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
CRM
0
Buys (3M)
4
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $26.52M
ALBER LAURA
Director
$500,266
@ $194.58 · 2026-03-19
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,178
@ $194.62 · 2026-03-18
KIRK DAVID BLAIR
Director
$500,722
@ $258.64 · 2025-12-17
MORFIT G MASON
Director and Beneficial Owner of more than 10% of a Class of Security
$25.02M
@ $260.58 · 2025-12-05
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CB
4
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $51.61M
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$3.10M
@ $364.54 · 2026-07-28
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.25M
@ $322.08 · 2026-06-08
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$7.39M
@ $321.51 · 2026-05-27
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$190,468
@ $329.53 · 2026-05-21
STEIMER OLIVIER
Director
$658,600
@ $329.30 · 2026-03-19
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$250,408
@ $325.21 · 2026-03-06
JOHNS BRYCE L
Officer
$504,925
@ $336.62 · 2026-03-04
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$2.57M
@ $336.44 · 2026-03-03
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$1.67M
@ $325.43 · 2026-02-13
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$5.00M
@ $335.09 · 2026-02-12
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Chief Investment Officer
$9.23M
@ $331.98 · 2026-02-06
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$4.99M
@ $331.47 · 2026-02-05
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.29M
@ $295.04 · 2025-12-02
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$253,666
@ $293.59 · 2025-12-02
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$4.85M
@ $296.45 · 2025-11-14
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.73M
@ $297.08 · 2025-11-13
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$6.66M
@ $281.00 · 2025-10-27
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$1.60M
@ $290.06 · 2025-07-01
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$154,707
@ $287.56 · 2025-06-16
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.54M
@ $293.16 · 2025-06-04
KEOGH JOHN W
President
$24.69M
@ $290.24 · 2025-05-21
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.90M
@ $292.13 · 2025-05-20
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$3.61M
@ $294.82 · 2025-03-20
BOROUGHS TIMOTHY ALAN
Officer
$4.37M
@ $296.12 · 2025-03-18
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$221,583
@ $290.41 · 2025-03-14
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$2.87M
@ $286.96 · 2025-03-04
OHSIEK GEORGE F
Officer
$269,503
@ $267.63 · 2025-02-11
GREENBERG EVAN G
Chief Executive Officer
$17.55M
@ $288.42 · 2024-09-09
WAYLAND JOSEPH F
General Counsel
$1.89M
@ $287.07 · 2024-09-05
ATIEH MICHAEL G
Director
$75,035
@ $287.49 · 2024-09-03
LUPICA JOHN J
Officer
$4.28M
@ $285.49 · 2024-09-03
ORTEGA JUAN LUIS
Officer
$1.07M
@ $273.06 · 2024-08-20
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
CRM
0
Sells (3M)
15
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $40.30M
KROES NEELIE
Director
$929,276
@ $238.70 · 2026-01-14
HARRIS G PARKER
Officer and Director
$31.61M
@ $234.70 · 2025-12-02
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$575,140
@ $255.62 · 2025-10-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$590,102
@ $262.27 · 2025-10-21
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$567,631
@ $252.28 · 2025-10-20
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$550,430
@ $244.64 · 2025-10-17
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$558,810
@ $248.36 · 2025-10-16
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$536,322
@ $238.37 · 2025-10-15
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$548,796
@ $243.91 · 2025-10-14
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$1.10M
@ $244.75 · 2025-10-13
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$547,344
@ $243.26 · 2025-10-09
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$539,533
@ $239.79 · 2025-10-08
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$555,001
@ $246.67 · 2025-09-23
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$552,798
@ $245.69 · 2025-09-19
BENIOFF MARC RUSSELL
Chief Executive Officer
$545,384
@ $242.39 · 2025-09-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CB
FearGreed
😏Greed(62/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
CRM
FearGreed
😨Fear(39/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CB
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (62)
CRM
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (39)
View CB Full AnalysisView CRM Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CB vs CRM

Is Chubb Limited or Salesforce, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CRM trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $222981480055 vs. price $184), compared to CB's 22.6% margin of safety (intrinsic $453 vs. $351).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Chubb Limited or Salesforce, Inc.?

CB scores 100/100 (Wide moat), while CRM scores 58/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Salesforce, Inc. in financial distress?

CRM's Altman Z-Score of 0.8 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CB scores 1.0 (Distress zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Chubb Limited or Salesforce, Inc.?

CB earns 10.9% ROIC versus CRM's 9.6%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Chubb Limited's or Salesforce, Inc.'s?

CB's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to CRM's 88/100 (Very Safe). CB has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.