Compare StocksCAT vs T

Caterpillar, Inc. (CAT) vs AT&T Inc. (T): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CAT is undervalued at $815, with a DCF intrinsic value of $423110766782 and a margin of safety of 100%. T is undervalued at $23, with an intrinsic value of $56 and a margin of safety of 58%. Of the two, CAT has the wider margin of safety.

CAT
Caterpillar, Inc.
$814.81
VS
T
AT&T Inc.
$23.25

Rewards

CAT
  • Caterpillar, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Caterpillar, Inc. scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
T
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 16.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $14.89 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.
  • FCF yield of 12.2% is historically attractive — the business generates significant cash relative to its price.

Risks

CAT
  • Trailing P/E of 40.7x is 103% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • High leverage (2.13x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $77.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
T
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.89 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CAT
T
Valuation
$7.45B
Free Cash Flow
$19.44B
0.00%
FCF Yield
12.20%
40.66
Trailing P/E
7.67
26.76
Forward P/E
9.07
Quality & Moat
16.46%
ROIC
8.47%
51.33%
ROE
18.34%
28.60%
Gross Margin
59.72%
1.91
PEG Ratio
1.55
Balance Sheet Safety
2.13
Net Debt / Equity
1.15
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.30
0.80%
Dividend Yield
4.77%
CAT: 3Ties: 1T: 8
CATT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CAT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

T

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CAT
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$22.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$333.31
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
T
$1.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Creator
Σ Retained
$22.78B
Δ Market Cap
+$43.59B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CAT
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $814.81
Fair Value: $423110766781.62
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
T
58.2% Margin of Safety
Price is 58.2% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $23.25
Fair Value: $55.59
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CAT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $815?

-13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -11.1%

The market implies -13.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -11.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

T

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $23?

+2.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +4.5%

The market implies +2.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +4.5%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CAT
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
T
57/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with margin stability as the key competitive advantage. Improving roic consistency would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CAT
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
T
-2.78
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CAT
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 72.8%Retail & Other 27.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,729
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
T
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 70.2%Retail & Other 29.7%
No. of Institutional Holders3,514
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CAT
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $389,868
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$219,210
@ $876.84 · 2026-05-04
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$170,658
@ $568.86 · 2025-11-06
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$120,262
@ $320.70 · 2025-05-07
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$31,848
@ $318.48 · 2025-05-02
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$36,557
@ $365.57 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$39,857
@ $398.57 · 2024-12-04
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$33,859
@ $338.59 · 2024-09-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
T
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CAT
7
Sells (3M)
33
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $243.77M
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$11.44M
@ $907.91 · 2026-05-14
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$5.64M
@ $909.79 · 2026-05-13
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$326,160
@ $906.00 · 2026-05-13
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$14.93M
@ $916.80 · 2026-05-11
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$22.35M
@ $922.92 · 2026-05-06
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$8.48M
@ $926.25 · 2026-05-06
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Officer
$14.40M
@ $918.71 · 2026-05-06
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$5.09M
@ $903.18 · 2026-05-05
KAISER JASON
Officer
$4.98M
@ $883.03 · 2026-05-04
CREED JOSEPH E
Chief Executive Officer
$1.80M
@ $718.93 · 2026-03-05
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.73M
@ $759.61 · 2026-02-23
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.35M
@ $763.39 · 2026-02-17
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$742,802
@ $764.20 · 2026-02-17
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$6.13M
@ $776.90 · 2026-02-13
KAISER JASON
Officer
$1.31M
@ $776.70 · 2026-02-12
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$9.59M
@ $767.08 · 2026-02-11
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$16.31M
@ $720.11 · 2026-02-06
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.36M
@ $722.15 · 2026-02-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$11.33M
@ $704.97 · 2026-02-04
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$10.91M
@ $682.99 · 2026-02-02
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$26.66M
@ $681.08 · 2026-02-02
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$7.26M
@ $680.45 · 2026-02-02
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.75M
@ $575.06 · 2025-12-31
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.71M
@ $571.44 · 2025-12-01
KAISER JASON
Officer
$6.03M
@ $563.60 · 2025-11-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.67M
@ $570.18 · 2025-11-10
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$8.23M
@ $562.36 · 2025-11-05
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$686,664
@ $572.22 · 2025-11-05
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$8.67M
@ $505.29 · 2025-10-10
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$7.94M
@ $462.65 · 2025-09-22
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer and Director
$7.09M
@ $412.87 · 2025-09-02
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$952,840
@ $410.00 · 2025-08-15
KAISER JASON
Officer
$902,650
@ $417.70 · 2025-08-11
KAISER JASON
Officer
$860,148
@ $354.70 · 2025-02-18
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $380.09 · 2025-01-16
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.57M
@ $408.59 · 2024-11-29
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.05M
@ $405.36 · 2024-11-25
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$766.00
@ $383.00 · 2024-11-15
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$5.19M
@ $410.25 · 2024-11-07
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.26M
@ $409.84 · 2024-11-06
DICKINSON DANIEL M
Director
$543,400
@ $418.00 · 2024-11-06
JOHNSON CHERYL H
Officer
$1.01M
@ $378.84 · 2024-11-04
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$368,789
@ $380.98 · 2024-11-01
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$1.12M
@ $351.36 · 2024-08-30
JOHNSON CHERYL H
Officer
$1.02M
@ $342.48 · 2024-08-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
T
0
Sells (3M)
0
Sells (12M)
SABRINA SANDERS S
Officer
$41,348
@ $27.57 · 2025-05-28
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CAT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
T
FearGreed
😐Neutral(50/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CAT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
T
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (50)
View CAT Full AnalysisView T Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CAT vs T

Is Caterpillar, Inc. or AT&T Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CAT trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $423110766782 vs. price $815), compared to T's 58.2% margin of safety (intrinsic $56 vs. $23).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Caterpillar, Inc. or AT&T Inc.?

CAT scores 75/100 (Wide moat), while T scores 57/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is AT&T Inc. in financial distress?

T's Altman Z-Score of 0.9 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CAT scores 2.2 (Grey zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Caterpillar, Inc. or AT&T Inc.?

AT&T Inc. (T) generates a 12.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Caterpillar, Inc.'s 0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Caterpillar, Inc. or AT&T Inc.?

CAT earns 16.5% ROIC versus T's 8.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Caterpillar, Inc.'s or AT&T Inc.'s?

CAT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to T's 91/100 (Very Safe). CAT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.