Compare StocksCAT vs LMT

Caterpillar, Inc. (CAT) vs Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-08-03, CAT is undervalued at $815, with a DCF intrinsic value of $423110766782 and a margin of safety of 100%. LMT is overvalued at $583, with an intrinsic value of $389 and a margin of safety of -50%. Of the two, CAT has the wider margin of safety.

CAT
Caterpillar, Inc.
$814.81
VS
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
$582.74

Rewards

CAT
  • Caterpillar, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 10% for 4 consecutive years, suggesting solid business economics.
  • Caterpillar, Inc. scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Free cash flow has grown at a 13.0% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
LMT
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation scores 74/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with revenue predictability as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Return on equity has consistently exceeded 20% over 4 years, indicating efficient use of shareholder capital.

Risks

CAT
  • Trailing P/E of 40.7x is 103% above the historical average of 20.0x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • High leverage (2.13x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $77.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
LMT
  • Gross margin of 11.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • High leverage (1.91x net debt/equity) combined with thin interest coverage (-1.0x) poses financial risk.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CAT
LMT
Valuation
$7.45B
Free Cash Flow
$5.56B
0.00%
FCF Yield
4.14%
40.66
Trailing P/E
21.50
26.76
Forward P/E
17.81
Quality & Moat
16.46%
ROIC
24.82%
51.33%
ROE
89.17%
28.60%
Gross Margin
11.80%
1.91
PEG Ratio
1.21
Balance Sheet Safety
2.13
Net Debt / Equity
1.91
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
2.73
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.73
0.80%
Dividend Yield
2.37%
CAT: 2Ties: 1LMT: 9
CATLMT

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CAT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

LMT

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CAT
$0.00
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Value Destroyer
Σ Retained
$22.05B
Δ Market Cap
+$333.31
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
LMT
$-1.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Market Cap Declined
Σ Retained
$8.03B
Δ Market Cap
$-12.81B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CAT
100.0% Margin of Safety
Price is 100.0% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $814.81
Fair Value: $423110766781.62
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
LMT
49.8% Overvalued
Price is 49.8% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $582.74
Fair Value: $388.94
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CAT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $815?

-13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies -11.1%

The market implies -13.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding -11.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

LMT

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $583?

+13.2%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +11.9%

The market implies +13.2% Owner Earnings growth, above historical trends.

Standard FCF implies a demanding +11.9%, reflecting heavy growth investment.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CAT
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
LMT
74/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat driven primarily by revenue predictability. Margin Stability is the area most vulnerable to competitive pressure.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CAT
-2.43
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
LMT
-2.23
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CAT
Insiders 0.2%Institutions 72.8%Retail & Other 27.0%
No. of Institutional Holders4,729
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
LMT
Insiders 0.1%Institutions 75.8%Retail & Other 24.1%
No. of Institutional Holders3,330
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CAT
0
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $389,868
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$219,210
@ $876.84 · 2026-05-04
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$170,658
@ $568.86 · 2025-11-06
MACLENNAN DAVID W
Director
$120,262
@ $320.70 · 2025-05-07
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$31,848
@ $318.48 · 2025-05-02
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$36,557
@ $365.57 · 2025-02-04
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$39,857
@ $398.57 · 2024-12-04
JOHNSON GERALD
Director
$33,859
@ $338.59 · 2024-09-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
LMT
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CAT
7
Sells (3M)
33
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $243.77M
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$11.44M
@ $907.91 · 2026-05-14
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$5.64M
@ $909.79 · 2026-05-13
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$326,160
@ $906.00 · 2026-05-13
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$14.93M
@ $916.80 · 2026-05-11
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$22.35M
@ $922.92 · 2026-05-06
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$8.48M
@ $926.25 · 2026-05-06
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Officer
$14.40M
@ $918.71 · 2026-05-06
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$5.09M
@ $903.18 · 2026-05-05
KAISER JASON
Officer
$4.98M
@ $883.03 · 2026-05-04
CREED JOSEPH E
Chief Executive Officer
$1.80M
@ $718.93 · 2026-03-05
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.73M
@ $759.61 · 2026-02-23
SHURMAN RODNEY MICHAEL
Officer
$1.35M
@ $763.39 · 2026-02-17
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$742,802
@ $764.20 · 2026-02-17
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$6.13M
@ $776.90 · 2026-02-13
KAISER JASON
Officer
$1.31M
@ $776.70 · 2026-02-12
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$9.59M
@ $767.08 · 2026-02-11
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$16.31M
@ $720.11 · 2026-02-06
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.36M
@ $722.15 · 2026-02-06
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$11.33M
@ $704.97 · 2026-02-04
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$10.91M
@ $682.99 · 2026-02-02
JOHNSON DENISE C.
Officer
$26.66M
@ $681.08 · 2026-02-02
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$7.26M
@ $680.45 · 2026-02-02
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.75M
@ $575.06 · 2025-12-31
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$5.71M
@ $571.44 · 2025-12-01
KAISER JASON
Officer
$6.03M
@ $563.60 · 2025-11-11
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$4.67M
@ $570.18 · 2025-11-10
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$8.23M
@ $562.36 · 2025-11-05
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$686,664
@ $572.22 · 2025-11-05
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$8.67M
@ $505.29 · 2025-10-10
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer
$7.94M
@ $462.65 · 2025-09-22
UMPLEBY DONALD JAMES III
Officer and Director
$7.09M
@ $412.87 · 2025-09-02
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$952,840
@ $410.00 · 2025-08-15
KAISER JASON
Officer
$902,650
@ $417.70 · 2025-08-11
KAISER JASON
Officer
$860,148
@ $354.70 · 2025-02-18
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$3.80M
@ $380.09 · 2025-01-16
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.57M
@ $408.59 · 2024-11-29
BONFIELD ANDREW ROBERT JOHN
Chief Financial Officer
$4.05M
@ $405.36 · 2024-11-25
SCHWAB SUSAN C
Director
$766.00
@ $383.00 · 2024-11-15
DE LANGE BOB
Officer
$5.19M
@ $410.25 · 2024-11-07
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
President
$2.26M
@ $409.84 · 2024-11-06
DICKINSON DANIEL M
Director
$543,400
@ $418.00 · 2024-11-06
JOHNSON CHERYL H
Officer
$1.01M
@ $378.84 · 2024-11-04
SCHAUPP WILLIAM E
Officer
$368,789
@ $380.98 · 2024-11-01
FASSINO ANTHONY D.
Officer
$1.12M
@ $351.36 · 2024-08-30
JOHNSON CHERYL H
Officer
$1.02M
@ $342.48 · 2024-08-22
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
LMT
0
Sells (3M)
4
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.29M
CAHILL TIMOTHY S
Officer
$3.00M
@ $649.47 · 2026-03-11
ULMER GREGORY M
Officer
$1.87M
@ $658.08 · 2026-02-27
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$1.59M
@ $660.64 · 2026-02-24
ST JOHN FRANK A
Chief Operating Officer
$3.83M
@ $491.04 · 2025-10-23
LIGHTFOOT ROBERT M JR
Officer
$1.42M
@ $442.42 · 2025-02-26
PAUL HARRY EDWARD III
Officer
$312,923
@ $442.61 · 2025-02-26
HILL STEPHANIE C
Officer
$2.12M
@ $442.51 · 2025-02-26
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CAT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(41/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
LMT
FearGreed
😐Neutral(59/100)

"Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CAT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (41)
LMT
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (59)
View CAT Full AnalysisView LMT Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CAT vs LMT

Is Caterpillar, Inc. or Lockheed Martin Corporation more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CAT trades at a 100.0% margin of safety (intrinsic value $423110766782 vs. price $815), compared to LMT's -49.8% margin of safety (intrinsic $389 vs. $583).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Caterpillar, Inc. or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

CAT scores 75/100 (Wide moat), while LMT scores 74/100 (Wide moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Caterpillar, Inc. in financial distress?

CAT's Altman Z-Score of 2.2 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. LMT scores 3.3 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Caterpillar, Inc. or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) generates a 4.1% free cash flow yield, compared to Caterpillar, Inc.'s 0.0%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Caterpillar, Inc. or Lockheed Martin Corporation?

LMT earns 24.8% ROIC versus CAT's 16.5%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Caterpillar, Inc.'s or Lockheed Martin Corporation's?

CAT's dividend earns a safety score of 94/100 (Very Safe), compared to LMT's 84/100 (Very Safe). CAT has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.