Compare Stocks › CAH vs INTC

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs Intel Corporation (INTC): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-11-01, CAH is overvalued at $250, with a DCF intrinsic value of $217 and a margin of safety of -16%. INTC is overvalued at $66, with an intrinsic value of $8 and a margin of safety of -697%. Of the two, CAH has the wider margin of safety.

CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
$250.48
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$65.76

Rewards

CAH
  • ★Cardinal Health, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • ★Cardinal Health, Inc. scores 75/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with reinvestment efficiency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • ★Free cash flow has grown at a 24.2% CAGR over the past 4 years, demonstrating strong earnings power growth.
INTC
  • ★Net debt/EBITDA of -0.2x means the company holds more cash than debt — a net cash position.

Risks

CAH
  • ⚠Gross margin of 3.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • ⚠7 insider sales totaling $59.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.
INTC
  • ⚠Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.
  • ⚠Share count has increased by 21% over the past 4 years, diluting existing shareholders.
  • ⚠FCF yield of 0.2% is below 3%, meaning the market is pricing in substantial future growth to justify the current price.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CAH
INTC
Valuation
$4.75B
Free Cash Flow
$670.37M
8.19%
FCF Yield
0.19%
34.64
Trailing P/E
N/A
17.82
Forward P/E
35.50
Quality & Moat
26.72%
ROIC
4.06%
N/A
ROE
-9.62%
3.84%
Gross Margin
40.15%
1.25
PEG Ratio
1.36
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.21
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.20
0.82%
Dividend Yield
0.00%
CAH: 6Ties: 1INTC: 2
CAHINTC

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CAH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

INTC

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CAH
$12.51
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$2.64B
Δ Market Cap
+$33.06B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
INTC
N/A
Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
Σ Retained
$-22.02B
Δ Market Cap
+$74.94B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CAH
15.6% Overvalued
Price is 15.6% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $250.48
Fair Value: $216.70
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
INTC
Insufficient Data
Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
Current Price: $65.76
Fair Value: $0.00
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CAH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $250?

+13.8%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +2.1%

The market implies +13.8% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +2.1%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

INTC

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $66?

+54.7%
Market-Implied FCF Growth Rate

Market pricing in significantly higher growth than history — aggressive.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CAH
75/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. Reinvestment Efficiency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
INTC
17/100
No Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CAH
-2.72
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
INTC
-2.83
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone
Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CAH
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 91.5%Retail & Other 8.3%
No. of Institutional Holders1,992
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
INTC
Insiders 13.9%Institutions 62.8%Retail & Other 23.3%
No. of Institutional Holders4,439
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CAH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
INTC
1
Buys (3M)
2
Buys (12M)
Total value (12M): $10.25M
TAN LIP-BU
Chief Executive Officer
$10.00M
@ $95.00 · 2026-08-11
ZINSNER DAVID A
Chief Financial Officer
$249,985
@ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
GELSINGER PATRICK P
Chief Executive Officer
$251,198
@ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CAH
7
Sells (3M)
10
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $61.62M
SCHERER MARY C
Officer
$546,473
@ $237.39 · 2026-08-19
HOLLAR JASON M
Chief Executive Officer
$29.38M
@ $235.89 · 2026-08-19
MAYER JESSICA L.
Officer
$6.95M
@ $236.19 · 2026-08-18
MASON STEPHEN M
Officer
$8.27M
@ $236.40 · 2026-08-18
GREENE MICHELLE D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.75M
@ $235.72 · 2026-08-18
WEITZMAN DEBORAH
Officer
$1.73M
@ $235.45 · 2026-08-18
ALT AARON E.
Chief Financial Officer
$9.93M
@ $236.34 · 2026-08-18
GREENE MICHELLE D
Chief Technology Officer
$627,387
@ $228.47 · 2026-02-27
ALT AARON E.
Chief Financial Officer
$524,964
@ $225.50 · 2026-02-18
HALL PATRICIA HEMINGWAY
Director
$918,880
@ $229.72 · 2026-02-06
WEITZMAN DEBORAH
Officer
$3.22M
@ $150.53 · 2025-08-20
HOLLAR JASON M
Chief Executive Officer
$5.39M
@ $150.04 · 2025-08-20
MAYER JESSICA L.
Officer
$5.67M
@ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
MASON STEPHEN M
Officer
$6.19M
@ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
GREENE MICHELLE D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.01M
@ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
SCHERER MARY C
Officer
$1.01M
@ $149.25 · 2025-08-19
HOLLAR JASON M
Chief Executive Officer
$16.04M
@ $148.90 · 2025-08-19
ALT AARON E.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.18M
@ $148.78 · 2025-08-19
SNOW OLA M
Officer
$4.19M
@ $148.94 · 2025-08-19
SCHERER MARY C
Officer
$432,919
@ $123.55 · 2024-11-14
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
INTC
0
Sells (3M)
3
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $7.47M
CHANDRASEKARAN NAGASUBRAMANIYAN
Chief Technology Officer
$2.49M
@ $118.28 · 2026-05-29
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$4.01M
@ $99.53 · 2026-05-01
MILLER BOISE APRIL
Officer
$981,000
@ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
General Counsel
$650,000
@ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CAH
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
INTC
FearGreed
😨Fear(26/100)

"Market is pessimistic — investigate whether fears are temporary or structural"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CAH
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
INTC
⚪Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Fear (26)
View CAH Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CAH vs INTC

Is Cardinal Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation more undervalued in 2026?▼

Based on our discounted cash flow model, CAH trades at a -15.6% margin of safety (intrinsic value $217 vs. price $250), compared to INTC's -696.5% margin of safety (intrinsic $8 vs. $66).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Cardinal Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

CAH scores 75/100 (Wide moat), while INTC scores 17/100 (None moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is Intel Corporation in financial distress?▼

INTC's Altman Z-Score of 2.1 places it in the Grey zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CAH scores 5.1 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which company has better free cash flow, Cardinal Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) generates a 8.2% free cash flow yield, compared to Intel Corporation's 0.2%. A higher FCF yield means the business converts more of its market value into cash that can be returned to shareholders or reinvested.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Cardinal Health, Inc. or Intel Corporation?▼

CAH earns 26.7% ROIC versus INTC's 4.1%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

CAH vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? | SafetyMargin.io