Compare StocksCAH vs INTC

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs Intel Corporation (INTC)

CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
$195.24
VS
INTC
Intel Corporation
$99.61

Rewards

CAH
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
INTC

    Risks

    CAH
    • Gross margin of 3.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
    • Insiders have sold $2.1M worth of stock in the past 3 months — significant insider liquidation.
    • Free cash flow has declined at a 12.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
    INTC
    • Intel Corporation scores only 17/100 on the Economic Moat Score, suggesting limited durable competitive advantages.

    Key Valuation Metrics

    Learn more →
    CAH
    INTC
    Valuation
    $4.85B
    Free Cash Flow
    $-8.30B
    10.56%
    FCF Yield
    -1.66%
    29.85
    Trailing P/E
    N/A
    16.40
    Forward P/E
    66.78
    Quality & Moat
    31.39%
    ROIC
    1.72%
    N/A
    ROE
    -0.21%
    3.76%
    Gross Margin
    37.20%
    1.26
    PEG Ratio
    1.36
    Balance Sheet Safety
    N/A
    Debt / Equity
    0.36
    N/A
    Interest Coverage
    N/A
    1.25
    Net Debt / EBITDA
    0.86
    1.05%
    Dividend Yield
    N/A
    CAH: 5Ties: 1INTC: 2
    CAHINTC

    Historical Fundamentals

    Learn more →
    CAH

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    INTC

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation.

    $1 Retained Earnings Test

    Learn more →
    CAH
    $22.91
    created per $1 retained over 3 years
    Exceptional Value Creator
    Σ Retained
    $1.23B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$28.06B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
    INTC
    N/A
    Net losses over 3 years — test not applicable
    Company had negative cumulative retained earnings
    Σ Retained
    $-22.02B
    Δ Market Cap
    +$74.94B
    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
    > $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

    Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

    Learn more →
    CAH
    32.8% Overvalued
    Price is 32.8% above estimated fair value
    Current Price: $195.24
    Fair Value: $147.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued
    INTC
    Insufficient Data
    Enter initial FCF to calculate intrinsic value
    Current Price: $99.61
    Fair Value: $0.00
    Strongly undervalued
    Undervalued
    Fairly valued
    Overvalued
    Strongly overvalued

    Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

    Learn more →
    CAH

    What growth rate is the market pricing in at $195?

    +14.4%
    Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
    Standard FCF implies -1.2%

    The market implies +14.4% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

    Standard FCF implies a more demanding -1.2%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

    INTC

    Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

    Economic Moat Score

    Learn more →
    CAH
    84/100
    Wide Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
    INTC
    17/100
    No Moat
    70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

    No durable moat detected, though revenue predictability shows some competitive positioning. The business lacks consistent evidence of sustainable advantages.

    Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 5 years of fundamental data.

    Forensic Accounting

    Learn more →
    CAH
    -2.46
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
    INTC
    -2.59
    Unlikely Manipulator
    Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

    M-Score Trend

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

    Ownership Breakdown

    Learn more →
    CAH
    Insiders 0.3%Institutions 90.9%Retail & Other 8.9%
    No. of Institutional Holders1,887
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
    INTC
    Insiders 13.0%Institutions 61.8%Retail & Other 25.2%
    No. of Institutional Holders3,201
    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

    Insider Buying Activity

    Learn more →
    CAH
    0
    Buys (3M)
    0
    Buys (12M)
    No open market insider purchases found.
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
    INTC
    0
    Buys (3M)
    1
    Buys (12M)
    Total value (12M): $249,985
    ZINSNER DAVID A
    Chief Financial Officer
    $249,985
    @ $42.50 · 2026-01-26
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,198
    @ $22.53 · 2024-11-04
    GELSINGER PATRICK P
    Chief Executive Officer
    $251,946
    @ $20.16 · 2024-08-05
    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

    Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

    Insider Selling Activity

    Learn more →
    CAH
    3
    Sells (3M)
    12
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $52.95M
    GREENE MICHELLE D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $627,387
    @ $228.47 · 2026-02-27
    ALT AARON E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $524,964
    @ $225.50 · 2026-02-18
    HALL PATRICIA HEMINGWAY
    Director
    $918,880
    @ $229.72 · 2026-02-06
    WEITZMAN DEBORAH
    Officer
    $3.22M
    @ $150.53 · 2025-08-20
    HOLLAR JASON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $5.39M
    @ $150.04 · 2025-08-20
    SNOW OLA M
    Officer
    $4.19M
    @ $148.94 · 2025-08-19
    MAYER JESSICA L.
    Officer
    $5.67M
    @ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
    MASON STEPHEN M
    Officer
    $6.19M
    @ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
    GREENE MICHELLE D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $2.01M
    @ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
    SCHERER MARY C
    Officer
    $1.01M
    @ $149.25 · 2025-08-19
    HOLLAR JASON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $16.04M
    @ $148.90 · 2025-08-19
    ALT AARON E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $7.18M
    @ $148.78 · 2025-08-19
    SCHERER MARY C
    Officer
    $432,919
    @ $123.55 · 2024-11-14
    MAYER JESSICA L.
    Officer
    $1.81M
    @ $109.39 · 2024-08-21
    SNOW OLA M
    Officer
    $4.13M
    @ $108.91 · 2024-08-19
    MASON STEPHEN M
    Officer
    $5.13M
    @ $109.21 · 2024-08-19
    GREENE MICHELLE D
    Chief Technology Officer
    $435,400
    @ $108.85 · 2024-08-19
    HOLLAR JASON M
    Chief Executive Officer
    $7.97M
    @ $108.97 · 2024-08-19
    ALT AARON E.
    Chief Financial Officer
    $252,998
    @ $108.91 · 2024-08-19
    MAYER JESSICA L.
    Officer
    $1.91M
    @ $106.48 · 2024-08-15
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
    INTC
    0
    Sells (3M)
    1
    Sells (12M)
    Total value (12M): $981,000
    MILLER BOISE APRIL
    Officer
    $981,000
    @ $49.05 · 2026-02-02
    HOLTHAUS MICHELLE JOHNSTON
    General Counsel
    $650,000
    @ $26.00 · 2024-11-07
    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

    Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

    🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

    Learn more →
    CAH
    FearGreed
    😐Neutral(48/100)

    "Market is pricing this stock without strong emotion in either direction"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
    INTC
    FearGreed
    😏Greed(74/100)

    "Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

    Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

    ⚖️ Buffett Signal

    Learn more →
    CAH
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Neutral (48)
    INTC
    Awaiting DCF Data

    The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

    DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (74)
    View CAH Full AnalysisView INTC Full Analysis