Compare StocksCAH vs GS

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS): Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

As of 2026-06-19, CAH is overvalued at $222, with a DCF intrinsic value of $184 and a margin of safety of -21%. GS is undervalued at $1097, with an intrinsic value of $2507 and a margin of safety of 56%. Of the two, GS has the wider margin of safety.

CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
$221.77
VS
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$1096.56

Rewards

CAH
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. has maintained ROIC above 15% for 4 consecutive years, indicating a durable competitive advantage.
  • Cardinal Health, Inc. scores 84/100 on the Economic Moat Score (Wide Moat), with roic consistency as the strongest competitive dimension.
  • Share count has been reduced by 13% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
GS
  • Gross margin of 82.3% indicates strong pricing power — typical of businesses with significant intellectual property or brand strength.
  • Share count has been reduced by 11% over the past 4 years through buybacks, increasing each share's claim on earnings.
  • Each dollar of retained earnings has created $2.58 of earning power — management is an exceptional capital allocator.

Risks

CAH
  • Gross margin of 3.8% is low, suggesting a competitive or commodity-like market with limited pricing power.
  • 12 insider sales with no purchases over the past 12 months — a persistent pattern of insider selling.
  • Free cash flow has declined at a 12.8% CAGR over the past 4 years — a concerning trend.
GS
  • Trailing P/E of 20.0x is 36% above the historical average of 14.7x — the stock trades at a premium to its own history.
  • Altman Z-Score of 0.25 places the company in the distress zone — financial patterns resemble those of companies that experienced bankruptcy.
  • 7 insider sales totaling $35.6M with no purchases in the past 3 months — insiders are reducing their exposure.

Key Valuation Metrics

Learn more →
CAH
GS
Valuation
$4.85B
Free Cash Flow
N/A
9.34%
FCF Yield
N/A
33.91
Trailing P/E
20.03
18.49
Forward P/E
16.71
Quality & Moat
31.39%
ROIC
1.95%
N/A
ROE
14.55%
3.76%
Gross Margin
82.27%
1.41
PEG Ratio
1.68
Balance Sheet Safety
N/A
Net Debt / Equity
Net cash
N/A
Interest Coverage
N/A
1.25
Net Debt / EBITDA
N/A
0.90%
Dividend Yield
1.65%
CAH: 2Ties: 1GS: 4
CAHGS

Historical Fundamentals

Learn more →
CAH

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

GS

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

Price ÷ Earnings Per Share — how many years of current earnings you're paying for at today's price. Lower P/E may indicate undervaluation. The dashed forward point is the forward P/E — today's price ÷ analyst consensus EPS.

$1 Retained Earnings Test

Learn more →
CAH
$22.91
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$1.23B
Δ Market Cap
+$28.06B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer
GS
$5.60
created per $1 retained over 3 years
Exceptional Value Creator
Σ Retained
$26.00B
Δ Market Cap
+$145.60B
Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Buffett's "$1 Test": For every $1 of earnings retained, has management created at least $1 of market value?
> $1 created per $1 retained = Value Creator · < $1 created = Value Destroyer

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Learn more →
CAH
20.7% Overvalued
Price is 20.7% above estimated fair value
Current Price: $221.77
Fair Value: $183.78
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued
GS
56.3% Margin of Safety
Price is 56.3% below estimated fair value
Current Price: $1096.56
Fair Value: $2506.96
Strongly undervalued
Undervalued
Fairly valued
Overvalued
Strongly overvalued

Reverse DCF — Market-Implied Growth

Learn more →
CAH

What growth rate is the market pricing in at $222?

+13.9%
Market-Implied Owner Earnings Growth
Standard FCF implies +0.4%

The market implies +13.9% Owner Earnings growth, below historical trends — potential opportunity.

Standard FCF implies a more demanding +0.4%, reflecting heavy growth investment expected to generate future returns.

GS

Requires positive FCF to compute implied growth rate.

Economic Moat Score

Learn more →
CAH
84/100
Wide Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Wide moat with strength across all dimensions. ROIC Consistency is the standout factor.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.
GS
65/100
Narrow Moat
70+ Wide · 40-69 Narrow · <40 None

Narrow moat with reinvestment efficiency as the key competitive advantage. Improving margin stability would strengthen the moat.

Composite score measuring competitive advantage durability across four dimensions: returns above cost of capital, pricing power stability, revenue predictability, and capital efficiency. Based on 4 years of fundamental data.

Forensic Accounting

Learn more →
CAH
-2.46
Unlikely Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.
GS
-2.00
Possible Manipulator
Above -1.78 = likely manipulator · -2.22 to -1.78 = grey zone

M-Score Trend

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Beneish's 8-variable model estimates the probability of earnings manipulation. An M-Score above -1.78 signals elevated risk — companies in this range have historically been 3-5× more likely to be manipulating earnings. Scores between -2.22 and -1.78 fall in a grey zone warranting further investigation.

Ownership Breakdown

Learn more →
CAH
Insiders 0.3%Institutions 89.9%Retail & Other 9.8%
No. of Institutional Holders1,921
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.
GS
Insiders 0.5%Institutions 74.6%Retail & Other 24.8%
No. of Institutional Holders3,780
High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders — a key signal in Buffett-style analysis. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

High insider ownership aligns management incentives with shareholders. Institutional concentration can indicate smart-money conviction but also crowding risk.

Insider Buying Activity

Learn more →
CAH
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
No open market insider purchases found.
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises
GS
0
Buys (3M)
0
Buys (12M)
HESS JOHN B JR.
Director
$2.00M
@ $511.68 · 2025-04-15
JOHNSON KEVIN RONALD
Director
$1.49M
@ $619.02 · 2025-01-17
FLAHERTY MARK A
Director
$29,545
@ $360.30 · 2024-09-27
Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises

Open market purchases · includes direct & indirect ownership · excludes option exercises.

Insider Selling Activity

Learn more →
CAH
0
Sells (3M)
12
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $52.95M
GREENE MICHELLE D
Chief Technology Officer
$627,387
@ $228.47 · 2026-02-27
ALT AARON E.
Chief Financial Officer
$524,964
@ $225.50 · 2026-02-18
HALL PATRICIA HEMINGWAY
Director
$918,880
@ $229.72 · 2026-02-06
WEITZMAN DEBORAH
Officer
$3.22M
@ $150.53 · 2025-08-20
HOLLAR JASON M
Chief Executive Officer
$5.39M
@ $150.04 · 2025-08-20
SNOW OLA M
Officer
$4.19M
@ $148.94 · 2025-08-19
MAYER JESSICA L.
Officer
$5.67M
@ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
MASON STEPHEN M
Officer
$6.19M
@ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
GREENE MICHELLE D
Chief Technology Officer
$2.01M
@ $148.82 · 2025-08-19
SCHERER MARY C
Officer
$1.01M
@ $149.25 · 2025-08-19
HOLLAR JASON M
Chief Executive Officer
$16.04M
@ $148.90 · 2025-08-19
ALT AARON E.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.18M
@ $148.78 · 2025-08-19
SCHERER MARY C
Officer
$432,919
@ $123.55 · 2024-11-14
MAYER JESSICA L.
Officer
$1.81M
@ $109.39 · 2024-08-21
MASON STEPHEN M
Officer
$5.13M
@ $109.21 · 2024-08-19
GREENE MICHELLE D
Chief Technology Officer
$435,400
@ $108.85 · 2024-08-19
HOLLAR JASON M
Chief Executive Officer
$7.97M
@ $108.97 · 2024-08-19
ALT AARON E.
Chief Financial Officer
$252,998
@ $108.91 · 2024-08-19
SNOW OLA M
Officer
$4.13M
@ $108.91 · 2024-08-19
MAYER JESSICA L.
Officer
$1.91M
@ $106.48 · 2024-08-15
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives
GS
7
Sells (3M)
17
Sells (12M)
Total value (12M): $92.56M
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$6.68M
@ $973.55 · 2026-05-14
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$13.42M
@ $939.07 · 2026-05-06
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$9.57M
@ $929.17 · 2026-05-01
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$634,927
@ $929.61 · 2026-05-01
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.23M
@ $930.70 · 2026-05-01
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.04M
@ $936.18 · 2026-04-23
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$1.02M
@ $919.19 · 2026-04-17
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$10.94M
@ $941.57 · 2026-02-09
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$255,387
@ $938.92 · 2026-01-29
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$2.64M
@ $927.17 · 2026-01-27
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$4.49M
@ $923.75 · 2026-01-23
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$8.89M
@ $927.51 · 2026-01-23
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$1.62M
@ $920.62 · 2026-01-23
WALDRON JOHN E.
President
$13.69M
@ $750.30 · 2025-08-28
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$5.41M
@ $724.40 · 2025-07-25
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.71M
@ $712.31 · 2025-07-23
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$4.31M
@ $717.39 · 2025-07-23
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.04M
@ $607.17 · 2025-05-14
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$1.50M
@ $622.15 · 2025-02-26
GOLTEN ALEXANDER SIMON
Officer
$3.31M
@ $636.25 · 2025-01-28
HALIO CAREY
Officer and Treasurer
$2.32M
@ $636.74 · 2025-01-24
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.28M
@ $627.01 · 2025-01-21
RUEMMLER KATHRYN H
General Counsel
$4.76M
@ $634.69 · 2025-01-21
HALIO CAREY
Officer
$965,120
@ $624.67 · 2025-01-21
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$3.06M
@ $612.08 · 2024-11-29
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$4.00M
@ $610.91 · 2024-11-29
FREDMAN SHEARA J.
Officer
$1.77M
@ $594.51 · 2024-11-06
COLEMAN DENIS P.
Chief Financial Officer
$7.67M
@ $593.03 · 2024-11-06
ROGERS JOHN F W
Officer
$3.83M
@ $596.36 · 2024-11-06
SOLOMON DAVID M
Chief Executive Officer
$3.00M
@ $500.29 · 2024-08-15
VINIAR DAVID A
Director
$2.51M
@ $502.43 · 2024-07-16
Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives

Direct ownership only · excludes indirect, option exercises, planned (10b5-1) sales & derivatives.

🎭 Mr. Market's Mood

Learn more →
CAH
FearGreed
😏Greed(69/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.
GS
FearGreed
😏Greed(66/100)

"Market is optimistic — be cautious and ensure you have a margin of safety"

Composite sentiment score based on 6 market signals. Inspired by Buffett's "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

Composite sentiment score based on market signals. Inspired by Buffett’s "Mr. Market" allegory — fear = potential opportunity, greed = potential risk. Must be used alongside fundamental analysis, not in isolation.

⚖️ Buffett Signal

Learn more →
CAH
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (69)
GS
Awaiting DCF Data

The Buffett Signal cross-references market sentiment with DCF valuation. Configure the DCF Analysis above to generate a signal.

DCF Margin of Safety: N/AMr. Market's Mood: Greed (66)
View CAH Full AnalysisView GS Full Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions: CAH vs GS

Is Cardinal Health, Inc. or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. more undervalued in 2026?

Based on our discounted cash flow model, GS trades at a 56.3% margin of safety (intrinsic value $2507 vs. price $1097), compared to CAH's -20.7% margin of safety (intrinsic $184 vs. $222).

Which stock has a wider economic moat, Cardinal Health, Inc. or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?

CAH scores 84/100 (Wide moat), while GS scores 65/100 (Narrow moat). The moat score measures competitive advantage durability across ROIC consistency, margin stability, revenue predictability, and reinvestment efficiency.

Is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. in financial distress?

GS's Altman Z-Score of 0.3 places it in the Distress zone, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk. CAH scores 4.8 (Safe zone). The Altman Z-Score is a five-factor model that predicts insolvency within two years; scores below 1.81 indicate significant distress.

Which stock has higher return on invested capital, Cardinal Health, Inc. or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.?

CAH earns 31.4% ROIC versus GS's 1.9%. A higher ROIC means the company generates more profit per dollar of capital employed, a hallmark of durable competitive advantage in Buffett-style analysis.

Which dividend is safer, Cardinal Health, Inc.'s or The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s?

CAH's dividend earns a safety score of 88/100 (Very Safe), compared to GS's 79/100 (Safe). CAH has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.